Thread: Evidence STILL severely lacking for Flight 93 mostly buried claim

Originally Posted by suede

Just wanted to reiterate to everyone, if someone posts prove that most of Flight 93 had buried, I'll cease to ever post here again. Now that should be a win-win situation for a lot of you!

Why on earth would anyone want that? You're very entertaining, and a perfect example of the modern 'truther'.

Originally Posted by suede

Just wanted to reiterate to everyone, if someone posts prove that most of Flight 93 had buried, I'll cease to ever post here again. Now that should be a win-win situation for a lot of you!

Can't be done. Period.

Originally Posted by suede

Wrong thread. (Surprised you didn't know that)

Wow, talk about running from a question.

Originally Posted by suede

Well that's where most of the evidence was, right? In the ground?

Not necessarily. The wreckage sure. The evidence is in the form of:

Eyewitnesses who saw the plane.
Air Traffic Controllers who tracked the plane.
The phone calls from the plane who reported it being hijacked.
The CVR from the flight that reinforces what happened on the flight.
The DNA found at the crash site.

That is evidence; your question is about trivia and is quite trivial.

Again, why is it you dismiss all of the evidence above?

[quote=suede;4798046]

Okay, I'll play along. I've answered SEVERAL of your questions out of turn so hopefully you will honor your word and answer mine.

Here's your evidence.

http://www.youtube.com/user/RKOwens4#p/u/9/xkivdEGph9A

Now, you said . . .

Originally Posted by suede

Digging up dirt and rocks doesn't count. Nor does digging a hole, placing an engine scrap in it along with a few small non-UA colored pieces.

You also said . . .

Originally Posted by suede

Why would the FBI lie about most of the plane burying then?

I'm assuming you would not say that if you didn't know it to be true. Do you have any evidence or proof that that's what happened or are you just making it up?

Why would the FBI lie about most of the plane burying then?

The FBI never made such a claim.

Originally Posted by Patriot911

Flight 1771 was mostly buried ... just like Flight 93.

Source, please?

Originally Posted by Hannibal

a perfect example of the modern 'truther'.

How do you mean?

Originally Posted by RtWngaFraud

Can't be done. Period.

Agreed, or the skeptics would have by now.

Originally Posted by candycorn

Wow, talk about running from a question.

Look who's talking!!!

The wreckage sure.

That's what I meant. So can you prove it? That's all I ask. Not only will I never post here again if you can, but before I leave I will publicly concede that Flight 93 was mostly buried in that field.

Again, why is it you dismiss all of the evidence above?

It's not the topic of this thread. Feel free to start your own thread about em.

Originally Posted by DDave

Okay, I'll play along. I've answered SEVERAL of your questions out of turn so hopefully you will honor your word and answer mine.

Here's your evidence.

http://www.youtube.com/user/RKOwens4#p/u/9/xkivdEGph9A

I didn't see where that proved most of the 757 buried. The deal was prove that, or concede it didn't, then I'll post my evidence.

If that video did and I missed it, please post the timestamp of where in the video it did.