Skeptics claim that when Flight 93 supposedly crashed in that field in Shanksville, this is what supposedly happened to most of the plane:
You would think if a massive Boeing 757 mostly buried in the ground, it would be super easy for that to be proved.CLAIM: "The people on the scene confirmed for me that the plane was mostly buried."
"I believe the people on the scene, and they say the majority of UA93 was buried at the scene of the crash."
"The links address the fact that most of the plane was recovered on that site, largely from within the earth."
Me: "Flight 93 recovered underground?" Skeptic: "Most of it, yes."
HOWEVER, we truthers have asked and asked and asked and asked for the skeptics to prove this extraordinary claim that most of the 757 buried, but to no avail.
How can most of a 757 bury in the ground and that not be easily proven by the skeptics?!?
Some skeptics give an extraordinary claim that they have "proof" that most of Flight 93 was buried, but for some odd reason, they keep refusing to to produce this evidence to prove their extraordinary claim, even when I offered to never post here again if they do!
There is only two logical reasons why skeptics can't prove most of Flight 93 buried and why they won't post the evidence of their claimed proof that it was:
1) they have no evidence because
2) nothing was buried.
If nothing was buried, this proves an inside job.