Thread: Prove that United 93 was planted

Originally Posted by diligent

I stopped believing in fairy tales or hairy monsters, a long, long time ago. This belongs in the same world of fantasy.

I agree, but some in this forum firmly believe in this theory. I'm giving them the opportunity to present their evidence, however, the response has been rather underwhelming.

Originally Posted by NAB

Let this be the repository for all Killtown disciples to deposit their proof that United 93 was planted in Shanksville, and didn't actually crash there.

Go.

no plane....

go!

Originally Posted by Fangbeer

That's not surprising. Truthers tend to take the word of people they meet in bars, folks with Youtube accounts, out of work professionals and guys that hide behind internet pseudonyms rather then people who know what they are talking about.

"Joe Blow said" is what you guys use as proof that 93 was buried. Why the change of the standards when it applies to you? "Joe Blow said" is good enough for you all...why not me?

"Joe Blow said" is what you guys use as proof that 93 was buried.

I haven't seen a single one of "us guys" use that term. We gave you names. We gave you contact information. We gave you our sources. Why don't you call those people and tell them they are lying?

Let me know who the random guy in a bar is and I'll tell him he's off his rocker.

Originally Posted by RtWngaFraud

"Joe Blow said" is what you guys use as proof that 93 was buried. Why the change of the standards when it applies to you? "Joe Blow said" is good enough for you all...why not me?

yep all (*)(*)(*)(*)in hearsay!

and when you look at the reports they only have "office of xyz" with no signature of any officer to avoid a tort for stepping outside their lawful authority.


yeh yeh we know the gubafia drill

Yet you silly truthers STILL run away from addressing Wally Miller. Just a common man put in a God awful situation. He was there. He saw everything. He put his name to it. All your whining doesn't alter these facts. Until you can prove Wally Miller is lying, you're all just talking out of your collective asses. Frankly, the entire truther bowel movement doesn't have enough credibility amongy you to even come close to the credibility of Wally Miller, so you're going to have to come up with something good.

Good luck!

Not that you'll be able to come up with anything reasonable. My bet is on brainwashing.

Originally Posted by Patriot911

Yet you silly truthers STILL run away from addressing Wally Miller. Just a common man put in a God awful situation. He was there. He saw everything. He put his name to it. All your whining doesn't alter these facts. Until you can prove Wally Miller is lying, you're all just talking out of your collective asses. Frankly, the entire truther bowel movement doesn't have enough credibility amongy you to even come close to the credibility of Wally Miller, so you're going to have to come up with something good.

What would Mr Miller attest to?

That he over saw the collection of human remains?

And when the GOVERNMENT gave him the official results from the DNA testing, he signed his name to death certificates?

What did he do?

Why would his words be more important than anyone else who was there?

Originally Posted by 10aces

What would Mr Miller attest to?

That he over saw the collection of human remains?

And when the GOVERNMENT gave him the official results from the DNA testing, he signed his name to death certificates?

What did he do?

Why would his words be more important than anyone else who was there?

Wrong again. Where does it say that the government gave him the results, and that he didn't do those tests himself?
As a coroner, he's trained in making those kind of IDs himself.

Originally Posted by 10aces

What would Mr Miller attest to?

That he over saw the collection of human remains?

And when the GOVERNMENT gave him the official results from the DNA testing, he signed his name to death certificates?

What did he do?

Why would his words be more important than anyone else who was there?

Wally Miller was THERE at the crash site. He was responsible for the retrieval of the remains. He was present for every aspect of the recovery. Now, if you want to try and pretend that the 600 pounds of human remains recovered were from different people planted there, please be my guest in explaining how and why they would do such a ridiculous thing.

In the mean time, Wally Miller is still an extremely credible witness that saw the plane parts, the buried pieces, the human remains, and all the evidence.

Not only does he believe a plane was there, so does EVERY SINGLE OTHER WORKER there as evidenced by the fact NOT ONE of them has ever even QUESTIONED the fact Flight 93 crashed there. 1100 people and not one doubts Flight 93 crashed there. Yet you want us to believe a bunch of loser truthers when they pretend they know better because their feeble minds can't comprehend the truth? Ironic and sad.

Originally Posted by Hannibal

Wrong again. Where does it say that the government gave him the results, and that he didn't do those tests himself?
As a coroner, he's trained in making those kind of IDs himself.

He is not a doctor

The gov did it.

The military DNA lab did the testing