Page 25 of 25 FirstFirst ... 152122232425
Results 241 to 248 of 248

Thread: A standard of evidense

  1. #241

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by RtWngaFraud View Post
    Disinformation plants??? Interesting angle. You know, I think we should just have a real investigation into all this controversial stuff and settle it once and for all, then move on.
    If ANYONE actually thought truthers would move on once they were proven wrong I bet people would be more for wasting more money on what everyone but truthers already knows to be true. But since we (and by we I mean truthers as well) know truthers will NOT accept ANY report that doesn't tell them what their paranoid delusions have already convinced them is the truth, what is the point?

    Quote Originally Posted by RtWngaFraud
    One day of honest live TV Congressional questions and answers, with all the key players on both sides ought to suffice.
    Suffice to what? Prove it was Al Qaeda and dash the dreams of every truther out there?

    Quote Originally Posted by RtWngaFraud
    It could even be over by lunch, considering the truther's case is so thin and all. Maybe even an hour?
    It would take less than five minutes to prove every single truther wrong. Put KSM on live TV and let him tell the world who was behind 9/11. Of course that still wouldn't prove anything to truthers. Delusions are such powerful things to the weak minded.


  2. Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Patriot911 View Post
    If ANYONE actually thought truthers would move on once they were proven wrong I bet people would be more for wasting more money on what everyone but truthers already knows to be true. But since we (and by we I mean truthers as well) know truthers will NOT accept ANY report that doesn't tell them what their paranoid delusions have already convinced them is the truth, what is the point?


    Suffice to what? Prove it was Al Qaeda and dash the dreams of every truther out there?


    It would take less than five minutes to prove every single truther wrong. Put KSM on live TV and let him tell the world who was behind 9/11. Of course that still wouldn't prove anything to truthers. Delusions are such powerful things to the weak minded.


    Truthers will accept the truth I'm confident. So far though, we haven't been shown much besides PERHAPS the date. Put up or shut up I would say is appropriate here. Open forum, and present the supposed evidence, allow interaction and the problem would go away if there weren't any such issues.



    Dash our dreams......PLEASE. Prove how ridiculous our allegations are...Oh...they WON'T. That's right.


    5 minutes? Well! If that's all it would take, then I don't understand the problem doing that. 5 minutes in exchange for the goobment to gain some credibility? You'd think they'd jump at the chance.
    EVERYBODY call in sick tomorrow, then watch real change begin. Hit the corporate fat cats directly in the pocketbook.

  3. #243

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by RtWngaFraud View Post
    I saw it in your link Sir..
    That was my link. You can't even keep straight who gives you the information.

    And if it is there, then surely you can tell us at what minute and second it is visible. I have looked repeatedly and seen nothing like that at all.

  4. #244

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by RtWngaFraud View Post
    Truthers will accept the truth I'm confident.
    Really? All they've done so far is run from the truth. Why won't they look at the evidence that is there now? Any investigation is going to contain that evidence because there is nothing to refute that evidence. All truthers come up with is "just because" and hope that is good enough. It isn't.

    Quote Originally Posted by RtWngaFraud
    So far though, we haven't been shown much besides PERHAPS the date. Put up or shut up I would say is appropriate here. Open forum, and present the supposed evidence, allow interaction and the problem would go away if there weren't any such issues.
    What evidence would you accept? Evidence presented in a court of law?

    Quote Originally Posted by RtWngaFraud
    Dash our dreams......PLEASE. Prove how ridiculous our allegations are...Oh...they WON'T. That's right.
    I already have. The lack of ability for you to see that isn't my problem. The very fact truthers can't defend their theories, have no evidence to back up their theories, and can't even state what really happened on 9/11 from start to finish does a far better job of proving how ridiculous truther allegations are than anything else. It is like the flat Earth society. They act just like truthers. No matter what evidence they are presented they turn their noses up at it and stick by their retarded theories.

    Quote Originally Posted by RtWngaFraud
    5 minutes? Well! If that's all it would take, then I don't understand the problem doing that. 5 minutes in exchange for the goobment to gain some credibility? You'd think they'd jump at the chance.
    Except for the fact truthers don't accept anything anyone says or any evidence they don't like. Thus it would be useless for the government to do so. Besides, why would they want to convince the bare handful of nutjobs out there that don't believe the truth? Catering to them only gives them some small amount of legitimacy. We all know they don't even deserve that little crumb.

  5. Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Patriot911 View Post
    Really? All they've done so far is run from the truth. Why won't they look at the evidence that is there now? Any investigation is going to contain that evidence because there is nothing to refute that evidence. All truthers come up with is "just because" and hope that is good enough. It isn't.

    Because it's faulty, it's suspect, and inconsistent with other pieces of the puzzle.

    What evidence would you accept? Evidence presented in a court of law?

    Possibly I could, so long as the presentation of the facts isn't all one sided and "official".

    I already have. The lack of ability for you to see that isn't my problem. The very fact truthers can't defend their theories, have no evidence to back up their theories, and can't even state what really happened on 9/11 from start to finish does a far better job of proving how ridiculous truther allegations are than anything else. It is like the flat Earth society. They act just like truthers. No matter what evidence they are presented they turn their noses up at it and stick by their retarded theories.

    Now see that's just how I describe your side to other curious folks.


    Except for the fact truthers don't accept anything anyone says or any evidence they don't like. Thus it would be useless for the government to do so. Besides, why would they want to convince the bare handful of nutjobs out there that don't believe the truth? Catering to them only gives them some small amount of legitimacy. We all know they don't even deserve that little crumb.
    They could put it all to rest if they wanted to....they cannot, so they do not. 9/11 is a "hot potato" still to this day. It's taboo to speak of it. Put in on CSPAN, and hash it all out. Just do it man...the hell with all this nonsense of "official" dancing.
    EVERYBODY call in sick tomorrow, then watch real change begin. Hit the corporate fat cats directly in the pocketbook.

  6. #246

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by RtWngaFraud View Post
    Because it's faulty, it's suspect, and inconsistent with other pieces of the puzzle.
    Bull(*)(*)(*)(*). You make the claims, yet you can't explain how it is faulty, how it is supsect or how it is "inconsistent" with anything other than truther theories that HAVE no evidence.

    Quote Originally Posted by RtWngaFraud
    Possibly I could, so long as the presentation of the facts isn't all one sided and "official".
    Again I call bull(*)(*)(*)(*). There are always strings with truthers. And they wonder why nobody believes them when they dismiss evidence just because it is "official".

    Quote Originally Posted by RtWngaFraud
    Now see that's just how I describe your side to other curious folks.
    Except you would be lying your ass off. I can defend the theories no matter how much you want to deny it. I have all the evidence by your own admission. I can state from start to finish exactly what happened on 9/11. See? YOu need any MORE proof you would be lying?

    Quote Originally Posted by RtWngaFraud
    They could put it all to rest if they wanted to....they cannot, so they do not.
    How do you put something to rest when a very small, but mentally (*)(*)(*)(*)ed up segment of society refuses to look at evidence simply because they are too ignorant and too wrapped up in their agenda? I asked you what evidence you would accept. You don't want to accept anything "one sided or official". What more evidence does ANYONE need that truthers simply refuse to look at evidence for no other reason than to push their agenda?

    Quote Originally Posted by RtWngaFraud
    9/11 is a "hot potato" still to this day. It's taboo to speak of it. Put in on CSPAN, and hash it all out. Just do it man...the hell with all this nonsense of "official" dancing.
    9/11 is no longer a hot potato. Truthers are dropping like flies because they can't keep up the bull(*)(*)(*)(*). It's been hashed out time and time again. You can't defend your own theories and neither can any other truther. This is proven post after post time after time. How does one prove ANYTHING to someone unwilling to look at, much less accept the truth?

  7. #247

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Patriot911 View Post
    Bull(*)(*)(*)(*). You make the claims, yet you can't explain how it is faulty, how it is supsect or how it is "inconsistent" with anything other than truther theories that HAVE no evidence.
    He can't back up anything.

    I have asked him several times to provide the time in a video where he claimed to have seen the intact nose of an aircraft that crashed nose down. He has said more then once he saw this, but nobody else has. And he will not give us the time where the rest of us can see it.

    RtWngaFraud credability = 0%

  8. Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Mushroom View Post
    That was my link. You can't even keep straight who gives you the information.

    And if it is there, then surely you can tell us at what minute and second it is visible. I have looked repeatedly and seen nothing like that at all.

    My bad...shills kinda all look alike in their posts..
    EVERYBODY call in sick tomorrow, then watch real change begin. Hit the corporate fat cats directly in the pocketbook.

Page 25 of 25 FirstFirst ... 152122232425

Similar Threads

  1. Trying To Come Up With A PM Standard
    By jmpet in forum Economics & Trade
    Replies: 1
    Last Post: Dec 28 2011, 12:12 PM

Tags for this Thread

Bookmarks

Bookmarks