LinkBack URL
About LinkBackslie? what lie?Originally Posted by Patriot911
So why is it you can't refute the fact prison planet was outright lying about the results of that poll? Instead you feel the need to attack me personally. Anyone else need any more proof OC has nothing?
Banned
Sr. Correspondent
lie? what lie?So why is it you can't refute the fact prison planet was outright lying about the results of that poll? Instead you feel the need to attack me personally. Anyone else need any more proof OC has nothing?
Analyst
Truther standard operating procedure. If you present them with facts they can't refute you will be labeled a shill, a Bush dupe, said to be in denial or part of some government paid job to counter them.
If their case is so strong you'd think they would have no trouble at all presenting more credible facts.
How nice it would be if everyone judged their party by the same high standards that they use to judge the other party.
Banned
Well, since you want to play stupid and pretend you can't read, I will repost it:
Now, would you care to address the fact the poll does NOT make the claim Prison Planet claims? Or do you need the word lie defined for you.Why? Just because the site BLATANTLY lies about the contents of the poll?Originally Posted by obediant_consumer
it appears that you have deemed the source credible so no further exchange is needed.
This is their headline: "Scientific Poll: 84% Reject Official 9/11 Story"
Yet this question is not asked. Apparently ANYONE who believes they haven't received 100% of the story outright rejects the official story. BWAAAAHAHAHAHA!!!!! What a crock of (*)(*)(*)(*)! I don't believe we know 100% of what happened on 9/11. I know we know the majority. I know Al Qaeda was behind it. I believe the official story because the evidence backs it up.
Thus your precious site is blatantly lying about what the poll represents. This is one lie among thousands told by prison planet over the years. The fact you believe them tells us everything we need to know about your standards of evidence and your credibility.
Banned
If their case had any merit at all you would think they would have no trouble at all presenting ANY facts.As it is they have to resort to opinion and outright lies. They all know this and it is quite apparent. Happens every time you ask them for a single shred of real hard evidence or what theory they actually believe and will back up.
Sr. Correspondent
Talking about lies. Here are some blatant lies you pro-official version people told on another thread.
Pentagon punchout hole?
(excerpt)
------------------------------------------------------------------
If all 13 witnesses saw the plane hit the Pentagon, why didn't any of them see the plane fly away as you claim?
------------------------------------------------------------------
The info in these links says they saw a 757 fly over but they didn't actually see it hit.
http://wtcdemolition.com/blog/node/2170
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NGvXVzdlcQk
(eight parts)
You deliberately misrepresented the info in the links to sway people who don't take the time to read the articles and watch the videos. That's a classic disinfo tactic.
Here's another case of a pro-official version poster misrepresenting what videos say to sway the viewers who don't take the time to watch the videos.
Pentagon punchout hole?
(excerpt)
-------------------------------------------------
You have only two eyewitnesses who put the plane at the wrong angle
-------------------------------------------------
Anyone who reads the article and watches the videos will see that this was a blatant lie. The other pro-official version posters backed him when asked about this. Read the rest of the thread to see.
You pro-official version people pretty much destroyed your credibility when two of you lied and the rest tried to cover for them.
Guru
Do you think Sgt. William Lagasse lied when he says he saw the plane impact the Pentagon?
(as well as nearly 100 others?)
Last edited by Hannibal; Jan 16 2012 at 11:58 AM.
"Keep on rockin' in the free world" ~ Neil Young
Analyst
The "truthers" are the ones spreading disinfo. So many competing theories and outrageous claims, but nothing in the way of evidence. Anyone trying to research it for themselves doesn't have a chance. The truth is forever lost in the noise which boils down to "We have no idea how it happened, we just KNOW it didn't happen the way the government said it did'.
Here are a couple of articles you truthers ought to read.
http://www.scientificamerican.com/ar...n-conspiracies
http://www.alternet.org/story/150730...e_may_believe_
How nice it would be if everyone judged their party by the same high standards that they use to judge the other party.
Banned
Wow. You want to talk about dishonesty? Try the difference between fly over and fly away.
You want everyone to believe you, but you can't answer the questions that would HAVE answers if your theories were correct. They're not and that is why you can't answer the questions with anything even coming close to a believable answer. Pretending the MSM is in control is seriously messed up and not a valid answer given the prevalence of the Internet and alternate sources of being heard.
Guru
exactly.well said.yeah he knows it was an inside job.Thats why i dont bother with him.
five 9/11 official conspiracy theory apologists on ignore.Reason? they lie when they are defeated and wont look at the evidence.
Guru
could not have said it better myself.you hit the nail right on the head.
five 9/11 official conspiracy theory apologists on ignore.Reason? they lie when they are defeated and wont look at the evidence.
Bookmarks