Thread: Simple request for Flight 93

Originally Posted by I_Gaze_At_The_Blue

Anything ever been in the OP's way to prevent them from going to Shanksville and speaking directly to those most intimately involved in this, after all NOTHING like direct source ???

You have to understand...we're only halfway to 500 posts. He can't possibly do anything that would significantly shorten "the thread's life", because the whole point of starting a thread on a forum is to rack up 500 posts, didn't you know?

Originally Posted by l4zarus

All you've 'proved' is OP's question is flawed or dishonest and you have deluded yourself into thinking this is a 'win' for 'truthers'.

Truther wins are few and far between. Apparently in their world, rejecting evidence = refuting evidence.

suede has been banging this drum for 7 threads now.

Originally Posted by I_Gaze_At_The_Blue

Anything ever been in the OP's way to prevent them from going to Shanksville and speaking directly to those most intimately involved in this, after all NOTHING like direct source ???

Times Shanks witnesses interviewed by:

Truthers = dozen
Skeptics = Zilch

Originally Posted by DDave

Apparently in their world, rejecting evidence = refuting evidence.

Which evidence that most of 93 buried have we rejected?

Originally Posted by suede

So why did the FBI lie about the plane being buried?

Fangbeer... /\

Originally Posted by suede

Originally Posted by DDave View Post
Apparently in their world, rejecting evidence = refuting evidence.

Which evidence that most of 93 buried have we rejected?

Since you're quoting DDave comment that's quoting my comment, even if you have me on ignore, you know he's replying to this:

Originally Posted by l4zarus View Post
All you've 'proved' is OP's question is flawed or dishonest and you have deluded yourself into thinking this is a 'win' for 'truthers'.

And since you read that post, Simple request for Flight 93
you have all the links to know this is a pointless troll thread. So don't know why you're bothering to ask more questions you're not going to acknowledge anyway.

Originally Posted by suede

Times Shanks witnesses interviewed by:

Truthers = dozen
Skeptics = Zilch

And why ever would us skeptics ever need "interview" these people anyway ... we are NOT the ones doubting their words and actions, so WHY would we need "interview" them at all ???

Originally Posted by suede

Which evidence that most of 93 buried have we rejected?

Everything that was presented in your 7 threads on the topic.

Originally Posted by l4zarus

Since you're quoting DDave comment that's quoting my comment, even if you have me on ignore,

suede put you on Ignore??

You must have asked him some too tough questions. He doesn't like that.

Originally Posted by DDave

Everything that was presented in your 7 threads on the topic.

suede put you on Ignore??

You must have asked him some too tough questions. He doesn't like that.

So that's what Suede looks like!

It's only a guess. He seems to have impulse control problems posting and he's not answering my questions, so one logical explanation is I'm on ignore. He can't blurt out spam at someone he can't see.

Originally Posted by I_Gaze_At_The_Blue

And why ever would us skeptics ever need "interview" these people anyway ... we are NOT the ones doubting their words and actions, so WHY would we need "interview" them at all ???

It's your to debunk all these "silly" conspiracy theories, right? One would think you'd want to put these theories to an end ASAP so you don't have to waste your lives battling the Truth Movement. Or do you want to keep wasting your life to battle the TM?