Simple request for Flight 93

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by suede

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by l4zarus View Post
Thank you for confirming the premise is flawed

---

Um, how did I "confirm" that?

---

http://www.politicalforum.com/9-11/2...post1060868041

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by suede;

I think that negates that the premise is flawed.

---

It's okay; it's easy to forget what you wrote if you didn't have your coffee yet. ;-)

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Patriot911

Show us evidence ANYONE there was lying. Be specific. Use the same level of evidence you would accept.

---

Well if nothing was buried, those who made the claim most of the plane was buried would therefor be lying. Common sense, really.

Quote:

---

I misspoke. I didn't mean to say much. I meant to say none. No witness I know of says none of flight 93 was buried.

---

Your statement is a logical fallacy. How many there knew the story was "most of the plane buried"?

Quote:

---

What does it matter to you? You claim they are all faked.

---

Try me. How many photos do you got? You said you have "plenty." That sounds like a LOT.

Quote:

---

They weren't taking requests.

---

They had people there photographing the excavation. How could they MISS all that alleged debris supposedly coming out of that hole?! Common sense, really.

Quote:

---

So you have proof that it was just dirt? Please present us with this proof.

---

Here's a gallery of photos of the excavation.

Looks like just dirt came out of that hole to me. Shouldn't there be piles and piles of plane debris somewhere?

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by l4zarus

http://www.politicalforum.com/9-11/2...post1060868041

It's okay; it's easy to forget what you wrote if you didn't have your coffee yet. ;-)

---

Maybe I misunderstood you. What "premise" do you think is flawed?

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by suede

Something that obviously shows most of Flight 93 buried. Is that so hard?
.

---

Done.

http://www.911myths.com/html/flight_93_3.html

Google is so easy.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by suede

Well if nothing was buried, those who made the claim most of the plane was buried would therefor be lying. Common sense, really.

---

I said give us evidence. You told us who. This isn't hard. Try to follow along.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by suede

Your statement is a logical fallacy. How many there knew the story was "most of the plane buried"?

---

So you think if someone doesn't see any of the plane buried, but they know the story, they're just going to go with the story and not question it? What... is skepticism reserved only for truthers with paranoid delusions? :lol:

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by suede

Try me. How many photos do you got? You said you have "plenty." That sounds like a LOT.

---

You haven't answered the question what would constitute valid evidence you would accept yet. Until you do that, you're not going to get anything else.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by suede

They had people there photographing the excavation. How could they MISS all that alleged debris supposedly coming out of that hole?! Common sense, really.

---

I didn't say the pictures didn't exist. I said you know how to get in touch with the people who have them. Why haven't you done so?

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by suede

Here's a gallery of photos of the excavation.

---

why do you need pictures when you already have a gallery?

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by suede

Looks like just dirt came out of that hole to me. Shouldn't there be piles and piles of plane debris somewhere?

---

Mod edit: Insult.They would be going through the debris layer by layer right? They wouldn't just be excavating it all out in one lump and then trying to go through it. Wouldn't it therefore make much more sense the plane parts were removed as they were excavated? They wouldn't just leave them in the dirt.

Is that all you got?

While you're at it, you STILL have not answered two very simple questions.

What evidence will you accept and do you believe anyone who claims Flight 93 crashed in Shanksville is a liar.

Simple questions. Why can't you answer them? Are they REALLY that hard? Or are you REALLY that insecure about your answers?

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by suede

Maybe I misunderstood you. What "premise" do you think is flawed?

---

The thread is only a handful of pages; you didn't even try to look it up yourself before posting and logging off. That's plain rude.

http://www.politicalforum.com/9-11/2...post1060865080

http://www.politicalforum.com/9-11/2...post1060865435

http://www.politicalforum.com/9-11/2...post1060868041

http://www.politicalforum.com/9-11/2...post1060868161

http://www.politicalforum.com/9-11/2...post1060868183

http://www.politicalforum.com/9-11/2...post1060868259

http://www.politicalforum.com/9-11/2...post1060868315

http://www.politicalforum.com/9-11/2...post1060868350

Now everyone can see how easy it is to look things up yourself, especially when the thread has so few posts.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by suede

Here's a gallery of photos of the excavation.

Looks like just dirt came out of that hole to me. Shouldn't there be piles and piles of plane debris somewhere?

---

I'm not sure that a link to misleading photos on Killtown's website is going to prove anything except that this so called 'controversy' was invented by a handful of internet trolls around "Killtown" who have a disturbing habit of making stuff up.

I hope Op clears up what he meant by 'controversy' soon.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by l4zarus

I'm not sure that a link to misleading photos on Killtown's website is going to prove anything except that this so called 'controversy' was invented by a handful of internet trolls around "Killtown" who have a disturbing habit of making stuff up.

I hope Op clears up what he meant by 'controversy' soon.

---

I see that blog is back up and running.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by NAB

I see that blog is back up and running.

---

This blog?

Hadn't realized it was down any time; it's only a month old. Maybe blogger servers were down, but it's up now.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by l4zarus

This blog?

Hadn't realized it was down any time; it's only a month old. Maybe blogger servers were down, but it's up now.

---

Maybe I'm confusing it with another blog on the same subject that seemed pretty inactive (although it's still "up").


the other site

Edit: seems to be a different version of the same site. Nevahmind.