Thread: Simple request for Flight 93

I ask one thing that either shows evidence of 93 being "buried", or someone to admit or say that there isn't any conclusive evidence that it was buried. He said, she said...aside. PROOF...or a simple admission. Then, this controversy can be retired.
Simple enough of a request...isn't it?

Originally Posted by RtWngaFraud

I ask one thing that either shows evidence of 93 being "buried", or someone to admit or say that there isn't any conclusive evidence that it was buried. He said, she said...aside. PROOF...or a simple admission. Then, this controversy can be retired.
Simple enough of a request...isn't it?

So what level of proof would you accept? You've claimed you're not going to take anyone's word for it, so what level is good enough for you? Pictures have been presented, but they're obviously not good enough for you. The FDR and CVR were recovered, but they're obviously not good enough for you. DNA evidence was recovered from the scene which matches passengers on flight 93, yet this isn't good enough for you.

So what is? Seriously. What level of evidence is good enough for you? I am thinking there IS no level of evidence good enough for truthers because they're not here for the truth. They all have their own personal agendas, but the common theme is they all have to ignore all the evidence in order to push their bull(*)(*)(*)(*) agendas.

This thread is a prime example.

Do you want the contact info of the people who worked the scene? No hearsay if you speak directly to them.

What is the point of this thread, and the 7 others like it?

Is there one?

Originally Posted by Patriot911

So what level of proof would you accept?

Something that obviously shows most of Flight 93 buried. Is that so hard?

Pictures have been presented
The FDR and CVR were recovered

At best those few photos representing less than 1% of a 757 (assuming those photos are legit) would only be acceptable if the official claim was "a couple pieces" of Flight 93 buried. We are told "most" of Flight 93 buried, so NOT EVEN CLOSE with those photos (assuming those photos are legit).

DNA evidence

How does that prove most of the 757 buried?

A 757 is a LARGE plane. How hard can it be to prove one mostly buried if one did indeed mostly bury?!

Remember, if a 757 mostly buried in Shanksville, that would be the FIRST TIME IN HISTORY a large plane mostly buried in the ground.

Originally Posted by suede

Something that obviously shows most of Flight 93 buried. Is that so hard?

That doesn't even come close to answering the question. Answer the question.

Originally Posted by suede

At best those few photos representing less than 1% of a 757 (assuming those photos are legit) would only be acceptable if the official claim was "a couple pieces" of Flight 93 buried. We are told "most" of Flight 93 buried, so NOT EVEN CLOSE with those photos (assuming those photos are legit).

You still haven't answered the question and only given us your retarded opinion. Answer the question.

Originally Posted by suede

How does that prove most of the 757 buried?

A 757 is a LARGE plane. How hard can it be to prove one mostly buried if one did indeed mostly bury?!

Remember, if a 757 mostly buried in Shanksville, that would be the FIRST TIME IN HISTORY a large plane mostly buried in the ground.

That isn't the question that was asked. That is YOU going back to all your other lameassed threads that got locked due to your childish behaviour. Answer the question that was asked. Focus. Stop trying to derail yet another thread with your silliness.

Originally Posted by Fangbeer

What is the point of this thread, and the 7 others like it?

Is there one?

Yes, it's for you guys who believe most of a 757 buried in Shanksville, which is allegedly why there are so few pieces of debris witnessed on the ground relative to a LARGE 757 when the FBI claims they later recovered almost the entire plane (95% of it), to prove it did and thereby proving whoever is making the claim it did wasn't lying.

So the original claim is most of Flight 93 buried. We haven't seen evidence to support this story, that most of the 757 buried.

Of the evidence we've seen so far, it leads us to believe the claim that most of Flight 93 buried is a FALSE and thereby whoever made this claim (making it, not just repeating it) is lying.

About this being about the 7th thread about this subject, we really didn't think it would be so hard for you guys who believe the claim that most of Flight 93 buried to be able to prove it really did. I personally thought if most of the 757 really did bury, you believers that it did would have proven it really did in the first or second pages of the original thread about this topic.

NEVER IN MY WILDEST DREAMS did I think it would be going on about 7 threads or so that you believers the Flight 93 mostly buried would still not be able to prove it did.

Do you think you'll be able to prove most of Flight 93 mostly buried in this thread? I hope so, for your sake because not only for every page in the thread that goes by and especially every thread made up of 50+ pages that goes by without you believers able to prove most of Flight 93 buried, it suggests to all the onlookers of these threads that A PLANE REALLY DIDN'T BURY in Shanksville and that suggests that 9/11 may be an INSIDE JOB after all.

So for your guy's sake, I'd try to offer up some evidence that most of Flight 93 buried AS FAST AS YOU CAN!!!

Originally Posted by Patriot911

That doesn't even come close to answering the question. Answer the question.

Hmm, well I thought it did.

As to what we will accept, how about we do examples and you post your best evidence that Flight 93 mostly buried and I'll tell you what I think of that evidence, K?

Remember, if a 757 mostly buried in Shanksville, that would be the FIRST TIME IN HISTORY a large plane mostly buried in the ground.


Not true

Originally Posted by suede

Hmm, well I thought it did.

As to what we will accept, how about we do examples and you post your best evidence that Flight 93 mostly buried and I'll tell you what I think of that evidence, K?

No. Answer the question. It is a simple question and one you should be able to answer. Now quit playing games and answer the question.