Thread: Sept 11, 2001 Research & Discovery Project

Originally Posted by SkyStryker

You ever going to prove they were all in al qaeda?

Already have. We can go in circles until you are bluer in the face. The truth is the truth. You've been presented with the evidence. You've rejected the evidence. You've been asked what evidence you would take. You've ignored that request.

At this point there should be no question in anyone's mind that you are just spamming which is a TOS violation.

Originally Posted by Hannibal

You very clearly stated that you don't read his posts. You have also made it clear that you don't read reports or look at evidence.

You are trying to twist out of it, and that is being dishonest. Stop it.

Keep being dishonest........

If you wanted to be honest you would not have gone to the trouble of editing my post to fit your idiotic agenda.

Originally Posted by Hannibal

He did. You keep eating crow on that.

The next time you ask anyone to prove anything all they have to do is link Bing. Right?

We all know a Report as large as the Commission's cannot be blanket linked. Common sense says the evidence in the report must be cited. But let's not get crazy and too far ahead. We are still trying to teach you to honestly quote posts.

Originally Posted by SkyStryker

The next time you ask anyone to prove anything all they have to do is link Bing. Right?

We all know a Report as large as the Commission's cannot be blanket linked. Common sense says the evidence in the report must be cited. But let's not get crazy and too far ahead. We are still trying to teach you to honestly quote posts.

You were given specific passages and chapters, as well as sources for further evidence. Do you need someone to read it to you, as well?

Originally Posted by SkyStryker

Keep being dishonest........

If you wanted to be honest you would not have gone to the trouble of editing my post to fit your idiotic agenda.

I didn't change the meaning of what you wrote in any way.

Your agenda keeps tripping you up. Stop that.

Originally Posted by SkyStryker

The next time you ask anyone to prove anything all they have to do is link Bing. Right?

We all know a Report as large as the Commission's cannot be blanket linked. Common sense says the evidence in the report must be cited. But let's not get crazy and too far ahead. We are still trying to teach you to honestly quote posts.

So you want to dishonestly try and pretend the 9/11 commission report, a report SPECIFICALLY about the attackers, what happened on 9/11 and how to prevent future attacks, is the same as a search engine that encompasses the entirety of the World Wide Web......

And you wonder why people don't believe a word you say? REALLY?

All you have to do is look at the table of contents to quickly find what you're looking for. Let's see. OOH! Chapter 7! All about the terrorists! Imagine that! OMG! The chapter goes into detail on each hijacker! They're receiving orders from KSM, the planner of 9/11! Imagine that!

It takes an honest person less than a minute to read the table of contents and see where the 9/11 commission talks specifically about the hijackers, how they were recruited, and the evidence that was compiled.

It takes a dishonest person pages and pages of denial, pretending he was never given the link, pretending that because the report doesn't contain every last shred of evidence that none of the evidence is good, and pretending the 9/11 commission report is the same as a search engine designed to disseminate the entire WWW to pretend there is no evidence the hijackers were associated with Al Qaeda.

Originally Posted by Hannibal

I didn't change the meaning of what you wrote in any way.

Your agenda keeps tripping you up. Stop that.

You did change the meaning but keep dishonestly quoting my posts. It helps show what desperation your camp has to reach just to have an excuse to post at all.

Originally Posted by Patriot911

Already have. We can go in circles until you are bluer in the face. The truth is the truth. You've been presented with the evidence. You've rejected the evidence. You've been asked what evidence you would take. You've ignored that request.

At this point there should be no question in anyone's mind that you are just spamming which is a TOS violation.

The next time you make a claim you should be prepared to cite the evidence and after asking at least ten times you still refuse to cite the evidence all the hijackers were in al qaeda. Thanks for showing what a joke it is to try and defend the OCT.

Originally Posted by SkyStryker

The next time you make a claim you should be prepared to cite the evidence and after asking at least ten times you still refuse to cite the evidence all the hijackers were in al qaeda. Thanks for showing what a joke it is to try and defend the OCT.

I've cited the evidence. You've rejected the evidence. And what hypocricy from you! You NEVER show evidence to back up your bull(*)(*)(*)(*) claims no matter HOW many times you're asked! And I don't have to pretend that is true like you do.

The only joke here is you. Unfortunately the joke is neither funny nor worthwhile.

Originally Posted by Patriot911

I've cited the evidence. You've rejected the evidence. And what hypocricy from you! You NEVER show evidence to back up your bull(*)(*)(*)(*) claims no matter HOW many times you're asked! And I don't have to pretend that is true like you do.

The only joke here is you. Unfortunately the joke is neither funny nor worthwhile.

If you can't cite the evidence they were all in al qaeda then why make the claim?