Thread: 9/11 explained in 5 minutes

Originally Posted by 9/11 was an inside job

Their handlers sure pay them a lot of money to constantly keep coming back for their arse beatings they constantly get here.I love it how they try and dodge these facts these experienced firefighters experienced in explosives or demolition experts as well as architects and engineers are cluleless.


they will come back of course and say they are in the minority that there are millions of others that disagree with them.the shills of course in the process ignore that if the speak out and tell the truth,they end up like Danny Jowenko. you just got to love their logic,that all these experts are lying and the zionists controlled media and all these corrupt government institutions with a lonnnnnnggggggggggggggggggg history og government corruption,are all telling the truth.that congress is not bought off and corrupt,that they all have our best interests at heart in looking out for us.comedy gold.these comedians need to start a comedy club.like i said,their handlers sure pay them a lot of money,no way on earth would they keep coming back everyday constantly to embarrass themselves everyday like they always do here ending up with egg on their face.

You need to start proving anyone here is 'paid' by anyone,or stop slandering us with your whining

Originally Posted by Patriot911

You can always tell the ones who have no ability to debate the facts when they have to insult a person based on their name and then run away from the topic at hand. Notice how the latest truther wannabe was unable to address the fact that not one witness backs up his bull(*)(*)(*)(*) claim, yet there were plenty who witnessed what absolutely could NOT be what he claimed? He has to run away and pretend his NEW facts are somehow more relevant than the ones he just got done claiming were the relevant ones. Truthers must go through a lot of shoes.

Then again, like all truthers, he gets the "facts" so messed up that one has to question either his credibility or his extreme gullibility.

Yes, there was a C-130 that was flying by the Pentagon. He was there at the request of ATC which was asking him if he could see the unidentified plane.


It is obvious English is a challenge for you. Care to explain what you mean by "Explain me the 2 hours when even the firefighters have had to stop to rescue the people inside the Pentagon and the timeline to recoved the pseudo "Black Box" of the pseudo flight 77 , "lefty-ahem-genius" ... ^^"?

I ask the same thing of all truthers who come here. Where is your evidence? Can you post one piece of real evidence? Not your paranoid delusions. Not people's opinions. Evidence. As in the kind that would hold up in a court of law.

OK, everyone! Get ready! Here come the insults, the running away from the facts and the pretending he is somehow intelligent!

Oki my english writing is bad , its not a surprised for me , and tell me how is your french writing ? ^^


After you insult me , saying that I am running away from the facts and stupid , oki if it pleased you I can live with that , especially if it come from you ^^

At first sight I have beleived that your video posted was about the Golf game installed on your computer ^^

In fact no , twas simply about your good fella the Lt Col steve O'Brien , the C130 guy who lie faster than his shadow

Attachment 14311


a good guy always ready to offer an helping hand ^^

Attachment 14310

http://www.thepentacon.com/Topic11.htm

Good reading , watchdoggy911 ^^

Oooups yes , I have nearly forgotten , a DC 130 really exist , it look like a very usefull plane for the US drones

Attachment 14312

Have a nice et sunny day even in England ^^

Originally Posted by raffphi

Oki my english writing is bad , its not a surprised for me , and tell me how is your french writing ? ^^

Non existant. Who would want to write in French? If I DID want to write on a French speaking board, I would make sure what I was wr

Originally Posted by raffphi

After you insult me , saying that I am running away from the facts and stupid , oki if it pleased you I can live with that , especially if it come from you ^^

I didn't insult you. That is what you do. The fact you can't defend your own claims isn't my fault.

Originally Posted by raffphi

At first sight I have beleived that your video posted was about the Golf game installed on your computer ^^

Really? Wow. Explains a lot, doesn't it.

Originally Posted by raffphi

In fact no , twas simply about your good fella the Lt Col steve O'Brien , the C130 guy who lie faster than his shadow

And we're suppose to just believe the words of a frenchman? Actually, your nationality doesn't matter. Nobody is going to believe you based on your good word because you've already been caught pretending issues exist where no issues exist. So how about backing up your claim?

Originally Posted by raffphi

Attachment 14311

a good guy always ready to offer an helping hand ^^
Attachment 14310

With what? Broken links?

Originally Posted by raffphi

http://www.thepentacon.com/Topic11.htm

Good reading , watchdoggy911 ^^

I've read it before. Apparently some people are incapable of getting everything to add up. Obviously something hit the Pentagon at the angle over a hundred witnesses saw it hit from. CIT claims the other plane flew over the Pentagon based on the testimony of a handful of witnesses and then lie about their testimony claiming that the plane came in at an even more extreme angle than the witnesses claimed.

Of course, testimony is always overridden by physical evidence. Not one person claimed there were two planes, yet you have all the physical evidence showing one angle and CIT pretending a radically different angle. If there were two planes as some pretend, why didn't a single person see two planes and why didn't a single person see a plane flying away from the Pentagon?

Originally Posted by raffphi

Oooups yes , I have nearly forgotten , a DC 130 really exist , it look like a very usefull plane for the US drones

US drones aren't flown from C-130s. There is no point for it, since the cameras onboad the UAV are used to fly the plane from remote locations.

Originally Posted by raffphi

Have a nice et sunny day even in England ^^

Not in England. I'm in Colorado. Is there ANYTHING you get right?

Originally Posted by Patriot911

I've read it before. Apparently some people are incapable of getting everything to add up. Obviously something hit the Pentagon at the angle over a hundred witnesses saw it hit from. CIT claims the other plane flew over the Pentagon based on the testimony of a handful of witnesses and then lie about their testimony claiming that the plane came in at an even more extreme angle than the witnesses claimed.

Of course, testimony is always overridden by physical evidence. Not one person claimed there were two planes, yet you have all the physical evidence showing one angle and CIT pretending a radically different angle. If there were two planes as some pretend, why didn't a single person see two planes and why didn't a single person see a plane flying away from the Pentagon?

This is one of the more braindead "theories" out there. Look at how many people caught the planes at the twin towers? Of course people would have caught images of a plane flying away. And don't those witnesses all say the plane hit the building?

CIT = DOA

Originally Posted by 9/11 was an inside job

Patriot always amuses truthers.In every post when he starts losing an argument constantly getting his arse handed to him on a platter here everyday, he makes things up and says YOU are the one running when thats all he does all the time constantly making up lies to try and save face in his posts when he is defeated.hee hee.

I don't agree with Patriot on everything. But what you are describing is not true and more applicable to "truther" trolls.

Ahem.

Originally Posted by Patriot911

Non existant. Who would want to write in French? If I DID want to write on a French speaking board, I would make sure what I was wr


I didn't insult you. That is what you do. The fact you can't defend your own claims isn't my fault.


Really? Wow. Explains a lot, doesn't it.


And we're suppose to just believe the words of a frenchman? Actually, your nationality doesn't matter. Nobody is going to believe you based on your good word because you've already been caught pretending issues exist where no issues exist. So how about backing up your claim?


With what? Broken links?


I've read it before. Apparently some people are incapable of getting everything to add up. Obviously something hit the Pentagon at the angle over a hundred witnesses saw it hit from. CIT claims the other plane flew over the Pentagon based on the testimony of a handful of witnesses and then lie about their testimony claiming that the plane came in at an even more extreme angle than the witnesses claimed.

Of course, testimony is always overridden by physical evidence. Not one person claimed there were two planes, yet you have all the physical evidence showing one angle and CIT pretending a radically different angle. If there were two planes as some pretend, why didn't a single person see two planes and why didn't a single person see a plane flying away from the Pentagon?


US drones aren't flown from C-130s. There is no point for it, since the cameras onboad the UAV are used to fly the plane from remote locations.


Not in England. I'm in Colorado. Is there ANYTHING you get right?

Pffft over the years you have become less and less sharp , at the old times of the pravda you was much better than that , now arguying with you is like shouting at an overbeaten doggy

You dare to say that some of my links does not work ? well on my computer they just work fine ^^

Well ok , you are not in England , now you say me that you are in the Colorado , surely then at the Buckley AFB I suppose , in fact I dont care at all ,
it change nothing its always the same NSA copy / paste ^^

I have told you already , its the DC130 that hold US drones , not the usual C130 , plus the fact that they can fly and direct the drones from a DC130 , its like a moveable piloting platform for drones ^^
Is it to me French to learn you what is able some part of your US arsenal of weapons ? I must be dreaming ^^

I love it.not once since this video has been posted has anybody been able to come on here and debunk the information in there and disprove the facts that the governments version of events is absurd.like clockwork,same ole same ole.no surprise.so predictable.

have to bring this thread back up for this reason below.

well really all you got to do for the lurkers that are in doubt still that lurk here who see this propanda by the shills being posted all the time, is just continue posting that five minute video, and the lurkers themselves can see how the coward paid trolls run off with their tail between their legs when challeneged to refute those facts and inconsistencies in them,that they NEVER take you up on the challenge ever.

that again is why i say that thread is really the only thread that needs to be in this section.the shills wont touch the information in it and the lurkers themselves who are objective and open minded, can see for themselves that its actually the governments version that is absurd and redicules.

matter of fact when I first made that thread,there WAS a lurker back then who saw that video from my thread I had just created at the time and he had his doubts about the official explanation but believed the governments explanation at the time,but after watching that video,he got smart and started looking at the evidence after that and now understand the official version is lies and propaganda thanks to that video.

Plus when you look at that thread,there have been multiple views to it so I knew there are thousands out there who even though they havent come on here and posted on the thread or in the section,they have seen that video and they are awake now.thats why I keep bringing that thread back up like I am going to right now.lol.

Originally Posted by 9/11 was an inside job

I love it.not once since this video has been posted has anybody been able to come on here and debunk the information in there and disprove the facts that the governments version of events is absurd.like clockwork,same ole same ole.no surprise.so predictable.

What does that video prove? While you may believe the Gov't account is 'absurd' that is really nothing more than your opinion. Additionally, that video is hardly a video of record. For example, it is patently false to claim that Rumsfeldt announced for the first time that 2.3 trillion was unaccounted for in the pentagons budget. The link below discusses the 2.3 trillion on 3/3/00. The inability of the pentagon to accurately maintain its books has been an ongoing problem for sometime. There is no evidence to suggest that it played a role in the 9/11 attacks in anyway.

http://hv.greenspun.com/bboard/q-and...?msg_id=002hxm

The truther type nuts always come out when something happens they don't understand. Reminds me of Salem witch burnings.