Thread: 9/11 No Longer Matters

9/11 will never be solved by a real investigation, real forensic science, because the masses are going to give their vote (power) away to this system on 6/11.

What?...

Originally Posted by psikeyhackr

Structural mechanics is just a subset of physics.

Build a multi-level physical model that can be completely collapsed by its top 15%.

Talk is cheap. After ten years the educational system and its textbook scam has a problem. But then all of the people with the relevant degrees who haven't admitted the obvious have a problem too. Everyone is supposed to believe verbal bullsh# over what they can test for themselves. LOL

psik

The physical model is the WTC. I explained to you why a scale model would exhibit different gravitational behavior already.

Originally Posted by psikeyhackr

Structural mechanics is just a subset of physics.

Build a multi-level physical model that can be completely collapsed by its top 15%.

Talk is cheap. After ten years the educational system and its textbook scam has a problem. But then all of the people with the relevant degrees who haven't admitted the obvious have a problem too. Everyone is supposed to believe verbal bullsh# over what they can test for themselves. LOL

psik

And as predictable as the sun rise and sun set, psik goes on a rant about his toy. I've told you how to build a structural model that not only models the towers much more closely than your toy, but would easily completely collapse by the top 15% being dropped on the rest. You know it would work. I know it would work. But you ignore it because then you would have nothing to (*)(*)(*)(*)(*) about.

So show us the math, psik. Don't pretend your retarded little toy is proof positive. It isn't even close.

So show us the math, psik.

He's going to show you his conservation of momentum stuff.

What he needs to understand is the difference between buckling modes of failure and crushing modes of failure. Of course, he has said in the past that that takes too much fancy calculus and that the problem should be able to be solved by someone with a high school understanding of physics.

Psi, why don't you change the structural members of your model to something with a much higher slenderness ratio, say, spaghetti strands. I'll bet your result will change.

When it does you should try and take a moment to figure out why a mass of spaghetti might have a different critical buckling load then an equivalent mass of paper loop.

Originally Posted by Fangbeer

He's going to show you his conservation of momentum stuff.

What he needs to understand is the difference between buckling modes of failure and crushing modes of failure.

Isn't he the guy who built the model with the rings of paper and washers???

<snicker, snicker>

That's about as stupid as Richard Gage and his cardboard box stunt.

So in simple terms, the top 15% could be said something like: "if the head goes so does the body"?

Originally Posted by Fangbeer

He's going to show you his conservation of momentum stuff.

What he needs to understand is the difference between buckling modes of failure and crushing modes of failure. Of course, he has said in the past that that takes too much fancy calculus and that the problem should be able to be solved by someone with a high school understanding of physics.

Psi, why don't you change the structural members of your model to something with a much higher slenderness ratio, say, spaghetti strands. I'll bet your result will change.

When it does you should try and take a moment to figure out why a mass of spaghetti might have a different critical buckling load then an equivalent mass of paper loop.

Notice that you ignore the issue of the paper loops being AS WEAK AS POSSIBLE relative to the Static Load. Another factor is the low cost and ease of construction so anyone can duplicate it for themselves.

But then there is the minor detail that NO ONE has built a physical model that can completely collapse FROM ANY MATERIAL. So do it and then talk.

psik

Originally Posted by psikeyhackr

Notice that you ignore the issue of the paper loops being AS WEAK AS POSSIBLE relative to the Static Load. Another factor is the low cost and ease of construction so anyone can duplicate it for themselves.

But then there is the minor detail that NO ONE has built a physical model that can completely collapse FROM ANY MATERIAL. So do it and then talk.

psik

Bull(*)(*)(*)(*). I've told you how to build it numerous times. Build it like the towers using the same materials you were already using. But since you are still far to scared to admit it, here is how to build it.

Take a dowel and as many washers as you want. Tape paper strips to the dowel and bend enough out to hold the washer in place. Drop a single washer on the top of the stack and you will end up with a complete collapse despite all of psik's whining about a complete collapse being impossible.

Originally Posted by Patriot911

Bull(*)(*)(*)(*). I've told you how to build it numerous times. Build it like the towers using the same materials you were already using. But since you are still far to scared to admit it, here is how to build it.

Take a dowel and as many washers as you want. Tape paper strips to the dowel and bend enough out to hold the washer in place. Drop a single washer on the top of the stack and you will end up with a complete collapse despite all of psik's whining about a complete collapse being impossible.

When you build a model of ANY MATERIAL that has more than 20 similar levels and can be completely collapsed where components SUSTAIN DAMAGE in the process I will give what you say some degree of credence.

until then YAWN!

psik