Thread: FBI agent claims 9/11 was controlled by our government.

Originally Posted by Jango

You know the government has sprayed chemicals in the air, right? And that people are actively trying to create a one-world government? Not every conspiracy theory is wrong. Nor does it make a person a nutjob. Censor yourself, man, before you speak of things you know little of.

Give me a break...

He also claimed, at a 1995 conference in Dallas, that a "slave auction" in which children were sold to men in turbans had been held in Las Vegas, and that four thousand ritual human sacrifices are performed in New York City every year.

Originally Posted by Jango

You know the government has sprayed chemicals in the air, right? And that people are actively trying to create a one-world government? Not every conspiracy theory is wrong. Nor does it make a person a nutjob. Censor yourself, man, before you speak of things you know little of.

How about "four thousand ritual human sacrifices are performed in New York City every year"?

Is that the quote of a rational man?

No. I was mostly giving what's his face a hard time. Jeez.

And since when did we start using Wikipedia articles?

I believe the slave auction one though. (*)(*)(*)(*)e like that happens, even in America. Human trafficking. How depressing...

Originally Posted by Hannibal

Then why bring such tainted sources to the table?

You may consider them tainted. I consider them relevant.

Originally Posted by RtWngaFraud

You may consider them tainted. I consider them relevant.

You only consider them relevant because they're agreeing with you. If the same site was supporting the "official story", you'd be the one calling them tainted and your opponents would be calling them relevant.

You're not seeking to discuss and debate the subject, you're looking to preach the doctrine of a definitive conclusion you've said you've already reached. Since many of your opponents are doing the same from the opposite direction, I don't see space for anything other than the insults and petty arguments that typically fill these threads.

What is unquestionably true is that none of you have ever presented anything that has been convincing enough to shift my general view bases on the balance of probabilities.

Originally Posted by Jango

No. I was mostly giving what's his face a hard time. Jeez.

And since when did we start using Wikipedia articles?

I believe the slave auction one though. (*)(*)(*)(*)e like that happens, even in America. Human trafficking. How depressing...

Originally Posted by RtWngaFraud

You may consider them tainted. I consider them relevant.

I'll bet that you guys consider The X Files a documentary.

Originally Posted by HonestJoe

You only consider them relevant because they're agreeing with you. If the same site was supporting the "official story", you'd be the one calling them tainted and your opponents would be calling them relevant.

You're not seeking to discuss and debate the subject, you're looking to preach the doctrine of a definitive conclusion you've said you've already reached. Since many of your opponents are doing the same from the opposite direction, I don't see space for anything other than the insults and petty arguments that typically fill these threads.

What is unquestionably true is that none of you have ever presented anything that has been convincing enough to shift my general view bases on the balance of probabilities.

It is still a free country Sir, and you have the right to believe whatever you choose to. Dig for the evidence and draw your own conclusions then if you find these threads insufficient. Google, learn and decide.

Originally Posted by Jason Bourne

I'll bet that you guys consider The X Files a documentary.

Not me....I don't watch Fox.....EVER

Not me!

Originally Posted by RtWngaFraud

It is still a free country Sir, and you have the right to believe whatever you choose to. Dig for the evidence and draw your own conclusions then if you find these threads insufficient. Google, learn and decide.

I certainly have. Gunderson is not a credible source.