Thread: The FBI claims bombs were used on 9/11

Originally Posted by Jango

What's wrong with their credibility? They appear, by all stances, to be a neutral source of information.

The fire fighters and cops who are not now claiming a cover-up are a valid source of information on wehat happened that day.

Drooling morons like Griffin and MacQueen just take their words and apply some utterly stupid sort of twist to them.

Those people who think that the steel should have been examined and tested where it sat at Ground Zero have no bleeding clue how fires are investigated. This applies as well to that freaking sociopathic rookie who founded Fire Fighters for Truth. He wasn't there and he belittles some of the people who helped write the proceduresw that the jackasses claim were ignored.

Originally Posted by Jango

What's wrong with their credibility? They appear, by all stances, to be a neutral source of information.

Originally Posted by Hannibal

Until you follow the original sources and note how they quote mine and skew.

Remember . . . you're supposed to be reading info from both perspectives. Not just from the sources that tell you what you want to hear.

Originally Posted by Jango

What's wrong with their credibility? They appear, by all stances, to be a neutral source of information.

Historycommons credibility is good because they source their claims, however they do have a truther balance that doesn't always tell the whole story. Basically they give everything; the good, the bad and the ugly. Following the links and doing further research can show if their sourced links are credible or not. Like any site, think for yourself and look at the big picture and you'll find the truth.

Originally Posted by Jango

I'm finding that the debris was being transported immediately after the collapse, and by the Department of Design and Construction. The decision was made pretty quickly too.

Well, DUH! There was a fire underneath that steel and, as far as FDNY knew, a few live people trapped and needing rescue.

Leaving the steel where it was was NOT at any time an option. Let me explain something about fire fighting operations.

The cops do not come anywhere near a fire scene until the fire Chief tells them it is okay. While they were trying to get the steel off of the fire and possible survivors, they had no time to baby-sit detectives swabbing down the steel looking for explosives residue that they already knew perfectly well would not be there.

Anybody who actually knows anything about the way that steel structures behave in a fire, or who knows anything at all about building demolitions knows that there was not ONE valid account of anything that could in any way have served as a demolitions charge. Nothing. Not even the moving walls in the basement.

Michael Burton, the apparent czar of the operation, already knew why all the towers fell, "Because they flew two planes into the towers."

This, again, falls into the category of things that make an experienced fire fighter and arson investigator say "WELL, DUH!"

And, before you ask, yes, I am a veteran fire fighter and college-trained in arson investigations.

Neither that senile old coot Griffin, or that fat pig Fetzer or the vapid twit Budhist monk MacQueen have ever offered an argument that has any merit outside their own pea-sized brains or those of the uninformed conspiracy-believers who follow them.

So it appears as though the FBI and other investigative teams were not able to thoroughly scan materials as suggested...“We are literally treating the steel removed from the site like garbage, not like crucial fire scene evidence.”

Total crap. We have thousands of objects recovered and identified from the rubble of the WTC. Everything got looked at until Rotten Rudy got tired of his city's looking like a war zone and started scooping and dumping as month or so later.