Thread: The FBI claims bombs were used on 9/11

Originally Posted by Jango

Wasn't the FBI investigating bombs because of the claims of survivors and firemen?

What claims would that be? I have yet to see a fireman claim he saw a bomb. Some survivors have changed their stories drastically since 9/11 and have since lost all credibility. Do you have some specific examples you could give us of a firefighter or survivor that claims to have seen a bomb?

Originally Posted by Jango

And they found zero residue in all the debris?

How long was it before debris was shipped out of the United States?

The cleanup took MONTHS....it doesn't matter,plus a lot of the steel is still here

Originally Posted by Jango

And they found zero residue in all the debris?

How long was it before debris was shipped out of the United States?

After bomb sniffing dogs, rescue operations, engineering teams from FEMA, ASCE, NIST and the FBI went over the scene ... and then after the inspections at Fresh Kills.

After that.

http://sites.google.com/site/wtc7lie...lssortingopera for lots of details.

Originally Posted by Patriot911

What claims would that be? I have yet to see a fireman claim he saw a bomb. Some survivors have changed their stories drastically since 9/11 and have since lost all credibility. Do you have some specific examples you could give us of a firefighter or survivor that claims to have seen a bomb?

The "official" story has changed over the years as well, yet you maintain it is still credible. How is that?

Originally Posted by LoneStrSt8

The cleanup took MONTHS....it doesn't matter,plus a lot of the steel is still here

The point is that protocol was ignored and if anybody ever DID want to do any investigation, they wouldn't be able to, because it was all shipped out of the country.

Originally Posted by Hannibal

After bomb sniffing dogs, rescue operations, engineering teams from FEMA, ASCE, NIST and the FBI went over the scene ... and then after the inspections at Fresh Kills.

After that.

http://sites.google.com/site/wtc7lie...lssortingopera for lots of details.

I found an interesting take on Mr. Mark Roberts (the SOURCE of your link) here:
http://www.propagandamatrix.com/arti...808Roberts.htm

The article suggests Mr. Roberts may be a bit "dishonest". Who would have guessed?

Originally Posted by RtWngaFraud

I found an interesting take on Mr. Mark Roberts (the SOURCE of your link) here:
http://www.propagandamatrix.com/arti...808Roberts.htm

The article suggests Mr. Roberts may be a bit "dishonest". Who would have guessed?

I thought you were going with direct responses. Why are you changing the subject and trying to obfuscate the topic?

Respectfully, Can you address the points brought up in the link?

Originally Posted by Patriot911

What claims would that be? I have yet to see a fireman claim he saw a bomb. Some survivors have changed their stories drastically since 9/11 and have since lost all credibility. Do you have some specific examples you could give us of a firefighter or survivor that claims to have seen a bomb?

Explosions. Especially the claims of explosions in the lower levels.

Originally Posted by Hannibal

After bomb sniffing dogs, rescue operations, engineering teams from FEMA, ASCE, NIST and the FBI went over the scene ... and then after the inspections at Fresh Kills.

After that.

http://sites.google.com/site/wtc7lie...lssortingopera for lots of details.

When was the first debris first shipped outside of the United States? Gimme a date here, man. And how long did it take those agencies/organizations to finish their investigations and/or compile a report to conclude that there was 'no explosives used'?

[QUOTE=RtWngaFraud;1061181282]I found an interesting take on Mr. Mark Roberts (the SOURCE of your link) here:
http://www.propagandamatrix.com/arti...808Roberts.htm

Well if that's all you found I'd say that Mark Roberts is pretty credible.

Can you say the same for Fetzer, Griffen and Gage?