Page 3 of 12 FirstFirst 1234567 ... LastLast
Results 21 to 30 of 115

Thread: Nanothermite's role in 9/11?

  1. Default

    Nanothermites role in 911 was to dupe the gullible into sending money to the charlatans who make their living duping the gullible.

    /end thread


  2. Default

    Quote Originally Posted by LoneStrSt8 View Post
    If their goal was to demolish the towers,why would they use an incendiary,instead of the industry accepted RDX,or C-4?
    Although I'm not a 911 truther, I can answer that.

    It's because in all half baked conspiracy theories Rube Goldberg must be honored at all times.

  3. Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Riffer View Post
    Nanothermites role in 911 was to dupe the gullible into sending money to the charlatans who make their living duping the gullible.

    /end thread
    someone living in denial and only sees what he wants to see.let me guess,you believe this hysterical conspiracy theory as well right?

    Everything you wanted to know about the 9/11 official conspiracy theory in 5 minutes.

    If this event wasnt such a tragedy committed by our government,this video would be hilarious because it shows how retarded someone would have to be to fall for it once the facts are revealed.hahahahahahahahahahah aha
    Last edited by 9/11 was an inside job; May 30 2012 at 11:46 AM.
    five 9/11 official conspiracy theory apologists on ignore.Reason? they lie when they are defeated and wont look at the evidence.

  4. Default

    Quote Originally Posted by RtWngaFraud View Post
    In the last few years, a series of peer-reviewed scientific articles has been published that establish the presence of thermitic materials at the World Trade Center (WTC). [A-D]

    Although we know that nanothermite has been found in the WTC dust, we do not know what purpose it served in the deceptive demolition of the WTC buildings. It could be that the nanothermite was used simply to drive fires in the impact zones and elevator areas – fires which would otherwise have gone out too early or not been present at all – and thereby create the deception that jet fuel-induced fires could wreak the havoc seen. Nanothermite might also have been used to produce the explosions necessary to destroy the structural integrity of the buildings.

    Nanothermite, also called superthermite, is the common name for a subset of metastable intermolecular composites (MICs) characterized by a highly exothermic reaction after ignition. Nanothermites contain an oxidizer and a reducing agent that are intimately mixed on the nanometer scale. Such nano-energetics are produced for various applications including propellants, explosives, and pyrotechnics.

    There are various ways to make nanothermites. They can be made as solid mixtures of aluminum and metal oxides which are typically produced using techniques like dynamic vapor phase condensation and arrested reactive milling. These mixtures are much like typical thermite mixtures, but with the components introduced on a much smaller scale. Alternatively, nanothermites can be made in a liquid solution that later gels, capturing the reactive components in an intimately mixed composite which is dried before it can be ignited. These are called sol-gel nanothermites, also known more generally as energetic nanocomposites.

    Sol-gel nanothermites often contain other components such as fluorinated silanes, and therefore carbon and silicon. The nanothermite found in World Trade Center (WTC) dust samples contains carbon and silicon as well. Ignition of such a nanothermite results in the production of gas which rapidly expands and does pressure-volume work.

    Information posted taken from here:

    http://digwithin.net/2011/06/19/the-...-nanothermite/




    It seems Nanothermite may have played varying roles in the controlled demolition of the WTC's. I guess we'll never know though because the site has long since been scrubbed down.
    what are you talking about,this site hasnt been scrubbed down.I can still click on the link.a link that the shills on here wont watch.
    five 9/11 official conspiracy theory apologists on ignore.Reason? they lie when they are defeated and wont look at the evidence.

  5. Default

    Quote Originally Posted by 9/11 was an inside job View Post
    someone living in denial and only sees what he wants to see.let me guess,you believe this hysterical conspiracy theory as well right?

    Everything you wanted to know about the 9/11 official conspiracy theory in 5 minutes.

    If this event wasnt such a tragedy committed by our government,this video would be hilarious because it shows how retarded someone would have to be to fall for it once the facts are revealed.hahahahahahahahahahah aha
    One of the main problems with conspiracy theorists is a lack of attention span.

    Given the posts of your I've read so far, I'm amazed you made it through five minutes.

    Oh and more irony.

    Thanks but you've already given ample irony for one day.

  6. #26

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Riffer View Post
    Although I'm not a 911 truther, I can answer that.

    It's because in all half baked conspiracy theories Rube Goldberg must be honored at all times.
    Shouldn't there have been more bowling balls in the wreckage?
    Out to the road,out 'neath the stars,feelin' the breeze,passing the cars.....

  7. Default

    The problem here is that the twoofs have failed to even find out what paint or nanothermite look like under a microscope. They just look at pictures that idiot boy Jones calls nonothermite and assume that that is what it is when, in simple fact, it looks exactly like paint. The conspiracy theorists do not even bother, no matter how many times we tell them that all of the aluminum and silicon are present as KAOLIN, bother to find out what kaolin looks like under a microscope. Total tools, they are.
    No civilization ever collapsed because the poor had too much to eat.

  8. Default

    Quote Originally Posted by 9/11 was an inside job View Post
    that ends the discussion right here that thermite was for sure used in the demolitions.case closed.the ones that deny this video,you did not watch it and are obviously in denial or in the case of many that troll here,a paid shill.
    Are you for real??? Do you seriously think that two internet videos comprise unequivocal proof that nanothermite was used to effect a great right wing conspiracy???? Do you have any idea what constitutes actual academic or scientific discourse? Seriously dude.......

  9. Default

    Quote Originally Posted by cooky View Post
    Are you for real??? Do you seriously think that two internet videos comprise unequivocal proof that nanothermite was used to effect a great right wing conspiracy???? Do you have any idea what constitutes actual academic or scientific discourse? Seriously dude.......
    as usual,your living in denial and have done no research and did not watch that video.you only see what you WANT to see so you wont watch it.you also prove you know nothing at all about the laws of physics.buildings dont topple STRAIGHT DOWN at free fall speed due to fires.If you did not sleep though junior high school science classes you would know this. thats something every kid learns at that age is about the laws of physics.its IMPOSSIBLE for all the steel columns to be removed for the towers to fall straight down like they did at free fall speed.that violates the laws of physics that scientists have gone by for thousands of years.
    oh and all these experinced firemen experienced in the sound of explosives are wrong and the government is right? great comedy relief there.

    these disinfo agents here at this site you blindly listen to ignore bld 7 same as you do.you or them have NEVER been able to get around bld 7 which is the crux of the 9/11 coverup commission.bld 7 was a couple of blocks away from the towers,an airliner did not crash into that building.there were buildings MUCH closer to the towers than bld 7 and had FAR MORE EXTENSIVE DAMAGE done to them and FAR MORE INTENSIVE FIRES BLAZING as the pictures prove that day.yet THOSE buildings never collapsed and bld 7 did? you are seriously living in denial and making yourself look foolish ignoring the laws of physics the more you blatantly come on here and ignore the evidence and facts,and hate to break your heart but NIST was caught lying saying there was no molten pools of metal.they PUBLICY say that in a video,firemen have said they saw MANY pools of molten metal.



    face it,NIST and the governemnt you worship are lying,those buidings were brought down by explosives.


    you crack me up that you worship this MORONIC conspiracy of the governments,its such a laughable fairy tale someone would have to be on drugs to belives .comedy gold.you guys ignore the facts in there everytime.
    Last edited by 9/11 was an inside job; Jun 01 2012 at 12:27 PM.
    five 9/11 official conspiracy theory apologists on ignore.Reason? they lie when they are defeated and wont look at the evidence.

  10. Default

    Quote Originally Posted by leftysergeant View Post
    The problem here is that the twoofs have failed to even find out what paint or nanothermite look like under a microscope. They just look at pictures that idiot boy Jones calls nonothermite and assume that that is what it is when, in simple fact, it looks exactly like paint. The conspiracy theorists do not even bother, no matter how many times we tell them that all of the aluminum and silicon are present as KAOLIN, bother to find out what kaolin looks like under a microscope. Total tools, they are.
    There you go,insult when losing an argument.Bush dupes ignore the laws of physics that scientists have gone by for thousands of years that every kid in junior high learns that that age and thanks for proving you did not watch that video and your afraid of the truth,hense the childish name calling.

    again you cant get around bld 7 that did not have anywhere near the amount of damage done to it that other buildings much closer sustained yet did not collapse,nor can you get around barry jennings testimony.oh and since you prove you stoop to chiildish name calling when you are losing an argument,have fun talking to yourself cause I wont read your next childish post.
    Last edited by 9/11 was an inside job; Jun 01 2012 at 12:24 PM.
    five 9/11 official conspiracy theory apologists on ignore.Reason? they lie when they are defeated and wont look at the evidence.

Page 3 of 12 FirstFirst 1234567 ... LastLast

Tags for this Thread

Bookmarks

Bookmarks