Thread: Dr Wood's claim that 80% of the steel from the towers was turned to dust.

Originally Posted by Jango

I went through your posting history here, not completely, but enough to paint a big enough picture. Why do you only post in the 9/11 section?

Why beat around the bush when calling him a shill obvioulsy your intent? Clearly it's more "interesting" than addressing his OP.

Shill, Anti-Truther, whatever. Fangbeer, since his debut here at Political Forums, has primarily only posted in the 9/11 section. And while I haven't searched, I am willing to bet that Patriot and Hannibal have the overwhelming majority of their TOS in this section too.

I find that interesting. For some people say that people like truthers and birthers are the "bottom of the barrel". But the observation I note is that there is always a core amount of people that valiantly fight against the conspiracy people. So you could say that there is company at the bottom. And I'm more or less curious as to why so many people have dedicated themselves to being the antithesis of what a truther is. Particularly, the bunch that we have on our board and that post here regularly before us.

And I just so happened to bring it up in this topic...

And...GO:

Originally Posted by Jango

Shill, Anti-Truther, whatever. Fangbeer, since his debut here at Political Forums, has primarily only posted in the 9/11 section. And while I haven't searched, I am willing to bet that Patriot and Hannibal have the overwhelming majority of their TOS in this section too.

I find that interesting. For some people say that people like truthers and birthers are the "bottom of the barrel". But the observation I note is that there is always a core amount of people that valiantly fight against the conspiracy people. So you could say that there is company at the bottom. And I'm more or less curious as to why so many people have dedicated themselves to being the antithesis of what a truther is. Particularly, the bunch that we have on our board and that post here regularly before us.

And I just so happened to bring it up in this topic...

And...GO:

How do you explain those who primarily post in the ct forum pumping up one theory or another? Going by your supposed logic, they, clearly, can only be agents of another foreign entity, or terrorist organization.

Now that the bs that you're leaning towards is out of the way......I primarily post in the ct forum at this forum. Not sure why, macabre fascination, old habits, whatever. The rest of this forum is complete crap and I post on other forums for my non-truther fix. In fact, the forum I spend most of my time on has absolutely no 9/11 conspiracy nonsense active. Mostly political theory, foreign policy, random bs, whatever, but no conspiracy theories. Believe it or not, the activity surrounding 9/11 inside job nonsense is pretty rare on the net these days. Outside a few circle-jerk forums, this is one of the few large forums that has any conspiracy atitivity.

So your point was what again?

Why I post in the 9/11 CT forum:

"This is (*)(*)(*)(*). (*)(*)(*)(*) and Ink."

Now, how about addressing the topic, or starting your own thread. Don't be a leech.

Originally Posted by Jango

Shill, Anti-Truther, whatever. Fangbeer, since his debut here at Political Forums, has primarily only posted in the 9/11 section. And while I haven't searched, I am willing to bet that Patriot and Hannibal have the overwhelming majority of their TOS in this section too.

I find that interesting. For some people say that people like truthers and birthers are the "bottom of the barrel". But the observation I note is that there is always a core amount of people that valiantly fight against the conspiracy people. So you could say that there is company at the bottom. And I'm more or less curious as to why so many people have dedicated themselves to being the antithesis of what a truther is. Particularly, the bunch that we have on our board and that post here regularly before us.

And I just so happened to bring it up in this topic...

And...GO:

....Start you're own thread.

What you are suggesting is actually against the forum rules. Thanks to a previous CT troll, I'm more aware of forum rules than I ever wanted to be. Or needed to be on any other forum.

So think of the moderators....the long suffering moderators.... Start your own thread before they need to lift a finger to mod this one.

Why all the Internet forum gang stalking and gaslighting directed at supporters of Dr. Judy Wood's overwhelming, conclusive, and indisputable evidence that leads to the conclusion of a Directed Energy Weapon "dustifing" the World Trade Center complex if she is wrong?

No one has disputed her research and nobody can because the evidence speaks for itself.

What is Gaslighting?
http://geeldon.wordpress.com/2010/09...s-gaslighting/

Delusional America and 9/11

How can I be so sure that Al Qaeda didn’t pull off 9/11? Well, that’s a truth that’s been obvious, known, and clear for a decade, although at the same time it has also been commandeered, lied about, misrepresented, muddled up and contradicted by all manner of spies, deceivers, infiltrators, propagandists, and false representatives of one position or another. For anyone who seriously wonders how an entire decade could have passed without any real clarity emerging to provide conclusive focus on the truth about 9/11—well, here’s the answer: So complete and so effective and so nearly-universal has been the control and suppression of ideas and information in our land of freedom that the brigands, pirates, and murderers who constitute our leaders have carried on quite unhindered not only in keeping the big falsehood alive and well but also in using it as their excuse to go on despoiling the planet, killing legions of human beings, destroying the Constitution, and sucking out the last drop of life-blood from the America nation itself.

What a perverted, murderous, earth-killing whopper of a lie it has been, the 9/11 lie, and how well—how diabolically, murderously, well—it has worked. And yet now, at last, its time in power is over—or, by all that’s right and true and honest, its time in power should be over. For, finally, a change has been made in the equation. Finally, we have been provided with a weapon against the great black lie. Finally, we have been given a stake to drive through its ugly, putrid, black, oozing heart. And what does this stake consist of? A book. It consists of a book. A book has been published, a book of science, a book powerful, irrefutable, extraordinarily moving, and true.
http://www.intrepidreport.com/archives/2515

Originally Posted by Emmanuel_Goldstein

No one has disputed her research and nobody can because the evidence speaks for itself.

Fangbeer is disputing her 'research' based on a very simple principle. Please address the question in the OP.

Or continue to dodge, your choice.

Oh maybe it's because what Ms. Wood is arguing isn't physically possible with any currently available technology with out using up most of the power wattage in the Northeast and shoved through a machine that no one has bothered to invent yet.

Originally Posted by Emmanuel_Goldstein

Why all the Internet forum gang stalking and gaslighting directed at supporters of Dr. Judy Wood

Sigh...no one is being gangstalked.

I refer you to a previous post on the subject:

Dr. Judy Wood Ph.D, Materials Science, 9/11, & Directed Energy Weapons

This assertion is ridiculous. While your definition and examples of gas-lighting are correct, claiming they apply on a forum, and are directed at a person (Judy Wood), who as far as we know isn't a registered participant, is obtuse.

Equally obtuse is your reference to "gang stalking", which would require we actually have personal contact with you in real life:
http://www.urbandictionary.com/defin...ang%20stalking

Gang Stalking is a form of bullying and intimidation from multiple perpertraitors.

Whereas ordinary bullying is usually one on one, and workplace mobbing is where multiple people in one workplace attack one (or a few) person(s), Gang Stalking involves multiple people attacking one person in any situation.

Groups of people, or, loosely organised people pick a target, and attempt to destroy the victims life in any way that they can.

They attempt to scare and terrorise their target, causing anxiety and other problems.

They will do whatever they can to get the target fired from their job.

People become a victim when they have attacked a member of a group (ie gang) as part of revenge, or, in the case of political groups, attack their political opponents such as authors, etc.

The person who is responsible for picking the victim out is called the Gang Stalking Rat.

All of this is done secretly, and is usually known only to the attackers, and the victims. Other people around the victim will be oblivious as to what is going on.


It's in extreme bad taste to paint yourself a victim of this serious form of bullying just because people don't agree with you. However, if you really believe that is the case, go to the moderators.

This vaguely reminds me of another conspiracy troll who equates disagreement with "attacks".

Now that madness is out of the way, you can reply to OP.

Originally Posted by garyd

Oh maybe it's because what Ms. Wood is arguing isn't physically possible with any currently available technology with out using up most of the power wattage in the Northeast and shoved through a machine that no one has bothered to invent yet.

I hate it when that happens.