
I can understand why you would be confused. But, since you have never read Dr. Judy Wood's textbook that would understandable. The rapid rustification I referenced was an after effect of a Directed Energy Weapon "dustifing" the World Trade Center complex. I was not discussing rustification in reference to the immediate destruction.
I'm Emmanuel Goldstein and I approve this message.
General Martin E. Dempsey
Dr. Judy Wood is being attacked on all fronts especially by Jim Fetzer and Richard Gage.
Anybody who attacks Dr. Judy Wood's textbook is, in my opinion, a full fledged disinformation tool.
Buy WHERE DID THE TOWERS GO? by Dr. Judy Wood, B.S., M.S. , Ph.D. and empower yourself with this textbook and its evidence of how the World Trade Center was "dustified".

One may ask, Why the lecture on what a hyperlink is? How do you know weather I clicked it on and read it or not? You have shown me some of the cards you are playing.
It’s getting easier to identify the promoters of disinformation when they are self-identifying like this.
Nothing in Dr. Judy Wood’s textbook has been refuted and cannot be. The only thing that has been refuted is the disinformation that has been promoted.
Anyone who claims that Dr. Judy Wood has said that “laser beams from space” destroyed the WTC have identified themselves as promoting disinformation and have destroyed their credibility in doing so.
Anyone who claims that Dr. Judy Wood has said that “space beams” destroyed the WTC have identified themselves as promoting disinformation and have destroyed their credibility in doing so.
Anyone who claims that Dr. Judy Wood has said that “ray beams from space” destroyed the WTC have identified themselves as promoting disinformation and have destroyed their credibility in doing so.
Anyone who implies that Dr. Judy Wood has said that (any of the above terms) destroyed the WTC have identified themselves as promoting disinformation and have destroyed their credibility in doing so.
Let's list those who have destroyed their credibility so we will know to disregard anything they say:
Steven Jones,
Jim Fetzer,
Greg Jenkins,
Adam Taylor,
Fangbeer
It's so obvious what is going on in numerous Internet forums and yet the gaslighting and gang stalking of supporters of Dr. Judy Wood continues as if unnoticed!
I'm Emmanuel Goldstein and I approve this message.
General Martin E. Dempsey
Dr. Judy Wood is being attacked on all fronts especially by Jim Fetzer and Richard Gage.
Anybody who attacks Dr. Judy Wood's textbook is, in my opinion, a full fledged disinformation tool.
Buy WHERE DID THE TOWERS GO? by Dr. Judy Wood, B.S., M.S. , Ph.D. and empower yourself with this textbook and its evidence of how the World Trade Center was "dustified".
while I do not know all the answers, I do know a cover up of the magnitude the truthers claim would never be kept quite by everyone involved, it would of leaked BEFORE it happened
now do I think some want to cover up what they DID NOT do, that they should of done, sure, that could happen
do I think some in government will make up stuff as explanations of how it happened even though they do not have a clue, sure, that could happen
.
Last edited by FreshAir; Jun 23 2012 at 10:07 AM.
~
belief is what is important, not so much what you believe, for instance, an ordinary sugar pill without belief helps no one, but with belief it can cure your ills and it can be quite the amazing little pill - the magic really comes from within
~
Out to the road,out 'neath the stars,feelin' the breeze,passing the cars.....
Last edited by 9/11 was an inside job; Jun 23 2012 at 10:17 AM.
five 9/11 official conspiracy theory apologists on ignore.Reason? they lie when they are defeated and wont look at the evidence.

Back it up. Point out one of these whistleblowers that the FBI told them not to pursue it. You going to pretend Sibel Edmonds? She went forward with it and exposed inefficiencies and bad policies within the FBI, but she never uncovered the US or anyone other than Al Qaeda being behind the attacks. So go ahead 9/11. Surprise everyone by finally backing up some of your bull(*)(*)(*)(*) claims.
Bookmarks