Not at all! I've given a concise summary of the origins of my socialist position and how, via reference to the labour market, I can refer to the inefficiency of capitalism. It just doesn't fit well with your agenda.

With regards that agenda, you're not celebrating the usefulness of the material you refer to. Take the source from Reglar. Its usefulness is only in detailing how Keynes, via neo-Keynesianism, has been misinterpreted. Its about hammering home that the analysis cannot simply be planted within the dominant neoclassical analysis. Its therefore about realising the links between Keynesianism and heterodox schools. It doesn't, however, have anything to do with my political economic stance

__________________
I was angry with my friend: I told my wrath, my wrath did end. I was angry with my foe: I told it not, my wrath did grow. And I watered it in fears, Night and morning with my tears; And I sunnèd it with smiles, And with soft deceitful wiles. And it grew both day and night, Till it bore an apple bright; And my foe beheld it shine, And he knew that it was mine, And into my garden stole, When the night had veiled the pole: In the morning glad I see; My foe outstretched beneath the tree.