Quote:
Originally Posted by eellison
God, I laugh at the disposable non-sense that is being posted on some of these websites. You have to be kidding. All the dirt and viciousness coming from the right over the last 12 years makes this post extremely amusing and pointless. How many democrats did Bush put in his administration? There is a difference between change based on policy than one base on personel. You expect for Obama to place corrupt republicans in his inner circle so they can sabotage his goals, objectives or policies. You need to consider the fired U.S. attorneys, national cronyism, making deals with business over consumers and a thousand other points to be made. It makes the possibility of inserting a conservative quite slim. As long as works together the republicans and do what is important for the American people, I don't see a problem with it. It is not what Obama can do for the republican party. It is what Obama can do for the American people. People are before party. If you party screws up their good credit with the American public, then that is their downfall.
I totally disagree with you. His presidency is base on how Obama will treat the republicans verses how the republicans treated the democrats for 12years.
|
Quote:
|
You need to consider the fired U.S. attorneys, national cronyism, making deals with business over consumers
|
How did you get there?
Quote:
|
All the dirt and viciousness coming from the right
|
How did the 300 investigations launched in the first 100 days of of Democrat rule in the Congress work out? I can't remember but one that made the news, but the rest sure hit the taxpayers in the wallet. Meanwhile, almost all these alternate energy bills just sat in Democrat committees while they pursued their 300 lil witch hunts.
Please explain how the Democrat Congressional power trip of 2007 was more important than moving forward on energy? While they were "investigating nothing" X 300 gasoline was going through the roof.
Talk about non-sense.