Sorry, but I just have no idea what the above means.

Once again, when you have something of relevance to the topic at hand to impart, and expect to be able to do so in a manner which other people might understand, please do so.

playing dumb?

okay .... sure ....

__________________
Have You Been To The "VORTEX COMMUNITY"?

I wish I was.

Seriously, I have no idea what you were saying previously. Could you try and explain it as if you were explaining it to an Alien? Please?

okay ... (since DANISH is part of your name - I can presume you are there)
I know places like Sweden and Holland are real different from us!

mainly the liberal left (and a lot of Democrats) are pro abortion

the right called "Conservatives (and most Republicans) are anti Abortion

IF the Liberal lefts kill their own offspring fetus

then the conservative right will not have to go through all this with the next generation of liberals.

Perhaps we need to let them kill their own!

Look at the ironic slant here ...

the American CONSERVATIVE is trying to save the life of the Liberals off spring

.... and the LIBERALS are fighting the Conservatives to let them (the Libs) kill their own babies
.... because they do NOT have the fortitude to use a few of contraceptives to protect themselves!

__________________
Have You Been To The "VORTEX COMMUNITY"?

Yes, I understand that bit. It is a sort of joke, right?

I just don't understand how this joke is relevant to the topic at hand. Is there some deeper meaning I haven't understood?

sure - to a small degree it was off tilt humor

intended to wake up another way of seeing what is being said and done ...

IS IT A JOKE (really?):

• left wants to kill their offspring?
• the right is trying to prevent it?
• the END RESULT is that the Conservatives have more liberals to fight against abortion by helping them live!

Sorry - being a (more or less) Conservative - it REALLY isn't funny to me!

It is disturbing .... what happens if we say screw it - they are JUST Liberals killing themselves off!

__________________
Have You Been To The "VORTEX COMMUNITY"?

Yes, and so what?

Why not let people live or die as they themselves choose?

if life is so nonchalant and trivial to me - it wouldn't be a problem ...

... but having my family is an irreplaceable treasure to me and I see that every life has it's own significance and virtue which actually make contributions in the world

... but these are the SAME ones who insist dogs and cats get fixed because there are so many animal shelters that kill dogs and cats ...

They aren't worth of the same values as they insist an Animal should be?

... got to say Good Night but it is past 11:30pm here and I like to get up before sun rise!

__________________
Have You Been To The "VORTEX COMMUNITY"?

I agree that every human being has its own significance.
Sorry, you lost me here. Are you asking whether I think your family members are as worthy as your pets? If so, yes I think so.
Have a good sleep then!

Roe vs Wade gave women the right to choose, it also protected them from causing harm or even death to themselves, in their desperation to end their pregnancies.

See Here

That is just one of many sites easily accessable. We have evidence that women have died from such 'back alley' abortions, or at the very least, seriously injured themselves. This cannot be denied.
What Roe V Wade did was prevent this from happening, as it gave women the right, and access to a safe, and legal abortion.

Before Roe V Wade, however, there must have been instances when the fetus could not be saved, and the womans life would have been deemed more 'important' if you will, leading to an abortion, in order to save the life, or preserve the health, of the mother.

Doctors do not yet know everything. They can tell you that you have a healthy baby, yet your child could be born with severe defects, likewise, a doctor could tell you that your child has severe defects, and the child is born, and is deemed perfectly healthy.
Medical science has progressed so far, but we still have a long way to go.
I guess you have to decide whether the risk is great enough for you to continue with a pregnancy.
It would, I imagine, be a very hard decision to decide whether to abort, or continue a pregnancy if you were told that your unborn child was ill, or was suffering from a fetal disfigurement, for example?
You could continue with the pregnancy, despite what you may have been told, and you may well be blessed with a healthy baby - but before the child is born, before you actually see that child - how can you be sure? Can you really trust someone that much to ensure the survival of your unborn child?
For some, that is indeed a lot to ask.

True, the doctor must do all he can to ensure survival of both mother and baby, but there may come a time when only one life can be saved, and thatlife will always be the mothers.

As I mentioned above, there may come a time when the fetus cannot be saved, and must be aborted.
Would Equal Care still apply if the fetus must be aborted?

Ectopic pregnancy is something I would never wish to experience. A friend of mine suffered from one a few years ago, and although she was only a few weeks pregnant, it is simply horrifying how much pain can be caused by one tiny embryo. Thankfully, she has fully recovered, and had two more children since.

I understand where you are coming from - but, as I have mentioned, not all lives can be saved under Equal Care - there may come a time when the pregnancy must be terminated to ensure the survival of the mother. Knowing this, isn't the intent of the doctors administering Equal Care to remove the fetus, thus aborting it?

__________________
Why is it that, as a culture, we are more comfortable seeing two men holding guns than holding hands? ~ Ernest Gaines