Political Forum
     

Go Back   Political Forum > Political Issues > Abortion


Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #41 (permalink)  
Old 01-26-2006, 04:32 PM
Hansmoleman's Avatar
Hansmoleman Hansmoleman is offline
Guru
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Boston, Massachusetts
Posts: 3,281
Hansmoleman is on a distinguished road
Credits: 19,043
Default So what you are saying

Quote:
Originally Posted by Wildbore";p=&quot View Post
I am admitting the fetus is alive. I am just saying when the fetus is inside a persons body, that women's rights are the ones that matter.

Human life is sacred, that is why women should be advised there are alternatives to abortion. But human life being sacred is no excuse to trample on women's right to choose.
IS that it doesn't matter if a woman takes away life because it's her well being over her unborn child's. Sounds like justification for murder to me, and not a very good justification at that. There are plenty of people who would gladly adopt the unwanted baby. Abortion just seems to be such a waste to me. The women are traumetized, it makes people mad that they do it, and the child is killed. For what? Her "right" to choose?
Reply With Quote
Sponsored Links
Red Cross - Donate Today    Save the Rainforest
  #42 (permalink)  
Old 01-26-2006, 04:44 PM
Sickntiredofliblies's Avatar
Sickntiredofliblies Sickntiredofliblies is offline
Analyst
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Texas till I die!
Posts: 2,024
usa us texas
Sickntiredofliblies is a splendid one to beholdSickntiredofliblies is a splendid one to beholdSickntiredofliblies is a splendid one to beholdSickntiredofliblies is a splendid one to beholdSickntiredofliblies is a splendid one to beholdSickntiredofliblies is a splendid one to beholdSickntiredofliblies is a splendid one to behold
Credits: 10,221
Default yep Hans,

If murder is a choice, it's a bad one. Someone's happiness, social life, or social status is not more important than another's life.
__________________
Society is produced by our wants and government by our wickedness ~Thomas Paine
Reply With Quote
  #43 (permalink)  
Old 01-27-2006, 01:20 PM
Wildbore's Avatar
Wildbore Wildbore is offline
Commentator
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Thunder Bay, ON
Posts: 1,262
canada ca ontario
Wildbore has a spectacular aura aboutWildbore has a spectacular aura about
Credits: 8,962
Send a message via MSN to Wildbore
Default Yup.

It is a justification for killing, a good one in my mind. Murder does not apply when a person has a legal justification for the act, in this case a women is simply exercising her right.
__________________
"Conservatives are not necessarily stupid, but most stupid people are conservatives." — John Stuart Mill
Reply With Quote
  #44 (permalink)  
Old 01-28-2006, 12:37 AM
JavaBlack's Avatar
JavaBlack JavaBlack is offline
Site Moderator
Guru
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Michigan
Age: 29
Posts: 13,985
usa us michigan
JavaBlack has a brilliant futureJavaBlack has a brilliant futureJavaBlack has a brilliant futureJavaBlack has a brilliant futureJavaBlack has a brilliant futureJavaBlack has a brilliant futureJavaBlack has a brilliant futureJavaBlack has a brilliant futureJavaBlack has a brilliant futureJavaBlack has a brilliant futureJavaBlack has a brilliant future
Credits: 93,553
Default ...

So abortion isn't murder so long as it's legal but is when it is illegal? Would you say the same if shooting a cheating spouse became legal? Or getting rid of a neighbor that steps on your porch to hand you some mixed up mail?
__________________
"It's never over... BOY!"
The Tall Man, Phantasm III
Reply With Quote
  #45 (permalink)  
Old 01-28-2006, 04:48 AM
Sickntiredofliblies's Avatar
Sickntiredofliblies Sickntiredofliblies is offline
Analyst
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Texas till I die!
Posts: 2,024
usa us texas
Sickntiredofliblies is a splendid one to beholdSickntiredofliblies is a splendid one to beholdSickntiredofliblies is a splendid one to beholdSickntiredofliblies is a splendid one to beholdSickntiredofliblies is a splendid one to beholdSickntiredofliblies is a splendid one to beholdSickntiredofliblies is a splendid one to behold
Credits: 10,221
Default ,.,

Quote:
Originally Posted by Wildbore";p=&quot View Post
It is a justification for killing, a good one in my mind. Murder does not apply when a person has a legal justification for the act, in this case a women is simply exercising her right.
Slavery was legal in the past. People were property. It seems that some still are. Many didn't care if slaves were killed back then, and people like you want to make sure that it keeps happening. You are a fool with absolutely no concept of human rights.
__________________
Society is produced by our wants and government by our wickedness ~Thomas Paine
Reply With Quote
  #46 (permalink)  
Old 01-30-2006, 01:29 AM
Wildbore's Avatar
Wildbore Wildbore is offline
Commentator
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Thunder Bay, ON
Posts: 1,262
canada ca ontario
Wildbore has a spectacular aura aboutWildbore has a spectacular aura about
Credits: 8,962
Send a message via MSN to Wildbore
Default lol

Quote:
Originally Posted by JavaBlack";p=&quot View Post
So abortion isn't murder so long as it's legal but is when it is illegal? Would you say the same if shooting a cheating spouse became legal? Or getting rid of a neighbor that steps on your porch to hand you some mixed up mail?
If abortion is illegal then that still doesen't constitute a murder. Since a fetus is not really recognized under the law, one could get away with a large fine, perhaps some jail time for committing a banned act. If the justice system recognizes the fetus as a person under the law, then there is no doubt that when an abortion is discovered the doctor would be charged with murder and the to-be mother would be an accessory.

Yes I would say the same thing. As much as people agree or disagree with laws, they are there, you have to live with them.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Sickntiredofliblies";p=&quot View Post
Slavery was legal in the past. People were property. It seems that some still are. Many didn't care if slaves were killed back then, and people like you want to make sure that it keeps happening. You are a fool with absolutely no concept of human rights.
Actually a fetus more closely resembles a random piece of garbage than property. You cannot buy/sell a fetus, a fetus cannot perform manual labour, a fetus cannot rebel, it exists inside someone, and that person has complete control over it. A fetus is pretty useless, that is one reason why I am not for overturning a women's right to choose. Abortion is not the ideal choice, but it is available to women, and few are going to lose sleep over the death of a fetus. HAHAHA, I am a fool because I speak the truth and want to protect women's rights... Sickntiredofliblies makes no sense. If anyone has a clear concept of human rights it is myself as I am not blinded by religion or patriarchy, like many of you are.

We can just put this in an analagy. Animal's have rights, but the mass slaughtering of livestock is OK. Personally I think millions of animals dieing per day is worse than hundreds of fetus' dieing per day, but farmers have the right to do this and I am not going to make an issue of it. Despite Women having the right to an abortion, the death of a fetus is suddenly a big issue. The vegetarians and pro-lifers have something in common, they both play politics with peoples rights, although there are alot more pro-lifers (far-right wingers).
__________________
"Conservatives are not necessarily stupid, but most stupid people are conservatives." — John Stuart Mill
Reply With Quote
  #47 (permalink)  
Old 01-30-2006, 05:01 PM
Hansmoleman's Avatar
Hansmoleman Hansmoleman is offline
Guru
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Boston, Massachusetts
Posts: 3,281
Hansmoleman is on a distinguished road
Credits: 19,043
Default ..

Quote:
Originally Posted by Wildbore";p=&quot View Post
It is a justification for killing, a good one in my mind. Murder does not apply when a person has a legal justification for the act, in this case a women is simply exercising her right.
No matter how good you think the case is, it's still murder. It may not be the murder of a fully mature person, but it is a life that is developing and will one day become a human. Granted, this is not an easy ethical question, but I believe it is an important one that will become even more important in the future.

I do not believe that anything at all is gained from the killing of a fetus. It is a complete waste of life. A woman who does not want her child can just as easily give it up for adoption so that the child can grow up and lead a happy, fulfilling life.
Reply With Quote
  #48 (permalink)  
Old 01-31-2006, 06:34 AM
Wildbore's Avatar
Wildbore Wildbore is offline
Commentator
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Thunder Bay, ON
Posts: 1,262
canada ca ontario
Wildbore has a spectacular aura aboutWildbore has a spectacular aura about
Credits: 8,962
Send a message via MSN to Wildbore
Default lol

Quote:
Originally Posted by Hansmoleman";p=&quot View Post
No matter how good you think the case is, it's still murder. It may not be the murder of a fully mature person, but it is a life that is developing and will one day become a human. Granted, this is not an easy ethical question, but I believe it is an important one that will become even more important in the future.
There seems to be no legal or religous document that supports your statements, which is no surprise to me.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Hansmoleman";p=&quot View Post
I do not believe that anything at all is gained from the killing of a fetus. It is a complete waste of life. A woman who does not want her child can just as easily give it up for adoption so that the child can grow up and lead a happy, fulfilling life.
Not much is gained from aborting a fetus and it is a waste of life. That doesen't mean it can or should be stopped. Young people don't want to waste 9 months of their lives being pregnant and at the same time, deal with a mess of paperwork. Adoption is an option, but it won't be for long after every child is forced to come to term, the system would be overwelmed. With invetro-fertilization becoming better and more popular, soon the main demand for adoption will come from same-sex couples. So unless you want to start habouring mass numbers of kids in big shelters, abortion should be maintained.
__________________
"Conservatives are not necessarily stupid, but most stupid people are conservatives." — John Stuart Mill
Reply With Quote
  #49 (permalink)  
Old 02-08-2006, 04:01 PM
Roux-en-Y Roux-en-Y is offline
Observer
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Posts: 49
Roux-en-Y is on a distinguished road
Credits: 1,000
Default none

Quote:
Originally Posted by Wildbore";p=&quot View Post
There seems to be no legal or religous document that supports your statements, which is no surprise to me.
LEGAL DOCUMENTS: 32 states have that recognize the unlawful killing of an unborn child as homicide in at least some circumstances.
RELIGIOUS DOCUMENT: Bible

You over looked these documents, which is no surprise to me.


Quote:
Originally Posted by Wildbore";p=&quot View Post
Not much is gained from aborting a fetus and it is a waste of life. That doesen't mean it can or should be stopped.
Did you read this after you wrote it? You’re basically saying that abortion is bad, but we should still allow it. Cocaine use, rape, and murder are also bad; do you think these things should be stopped or allowed?


Quote:
Originally Posted by Wildbore";p=&quot View Post
Young people don't want to waste 9 months of their lives being pregnant and at the same time, deal with a mess of paperwork.
Right!...because that would be such a drag! People shouldn’t have to take responsibility for their actions! LOL.


Quote:
Originally Posted by Wildbore";p=&quot View Post
Adoption is an option, but it won't be for long after every child is forced to come to term, the system would be overwelmed. With invetro-fertilization becoming better and more popular, soon the main demand for adoption will come from same-sex couples. So unless you want to start habouring mass numbers of kids in big shelters, abortion should be maintained.
So you want to use abortion as a means of birth / population control? You are a proponent of irresponsibility and cowardice. How about this, if two people have sex and the woman gets pregnant…take care of your baby. Isn’t that a novel idea?
Reply With Quote
  #50 (permalink)  
Old 02-09-2006, 10:21 PM
offspring13 offspring13 is offline
Observer
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Posts: 71
offspring13 is on a distinguished road
Credits: 830
Default .

Quote:
Originally Posted by sickntiredofliblies
Honestly puppies should be treated better than children? Sounds like your legitimizing those who throw their children in a dumpster. So in your book, puppies have more rights than children. Call me crazy, but I would rather be given away to someone who wants to take care of me than be killed. Heck I'd even rather be neglected(to a certain point) than be killed.
Never said puppies have more rights than children. I said I think it would be better to stop them from being born (not killed) than giving them away like puppies. I don't see how anyone could give their child away.

Quote:
Originally Posted by sickntiredofliblies
She has plenty of birth control options, including condoms, pills(both before sex and the morning after pill)....and *gasp* not entering into the process of creating the human being at all if she doesn't wish to have one.
She also has the option of abortion as birth control until it is proven that a few week old fetus has consciousness.

Quote:
Originally Posted by hansmoleman
It may not be the murder of a fully mature person, but it is a life that is developing and will one day become a human.
If it ain't fully mature (capable of survival on its own, having consciousness, hell...stops resembling a blob) its not murder. Going out and killing a deer is worse than scraping out a blob.

Quote:
Originally Posted by roux-en-y
People shouldn’t have to take responsibility for their actions!
They are. They are getting abortions. You want to take their right to responsiblity away and make the decision for them.

Quote:
Originally Posted by roux-en-y
So you want to use abortion as a means of birth / population control? You are a proponent of irresponsibility and cowardice. How about this, if two people have sex and the woman gets pregnant…take care of your baby. Isn’t that a novel idea?
It is irresponsible. Its much easier to use other forms of birth control than to go through the procedure. Sometimes other methods fail though.

I do agree that parents should take care of their children....once they are children. Most of the pro-lifers on here don't seem to agree however. They support giving your child away.
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are Off
Forum Jump

Sponsored Links

All times are GMT -8. The time now is 02:16 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.7.1
Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
LinkBacks Enabled by vBSEO 3.1.0
Template-Modifikationen durch TMS
vBCredits v1.3 ©2007 by Darkwaltz4
Advertisement System V2.1 By   Branden