"emaname"

Nuke-the-Gay-Whales -> fanatastic monacle

Assuredly, pro-choice under Roe V Wade is good law.
The constitutional bounds have been affirmed within my chronicles.
We in fact win things by political and philosophical completions.
Who is watching uVu?

So from with in two out with - let us barter.

Example an eye for eye exchange under sharia law.
The scenario is a rapist attacks a woman; whereby.
If the woman becomes pregnant and delivers the child alive, the man is executed.
If the woman does not become pregnant, the opposite hand and foot of the man is severed.

Affirmation of the eternal is being and becoming.
For eternal being and becoming through procreation, every number counts.

Suppose in secular society, assume where abortion is not allowed, the woman decides to keep the baby, and a convict exists. If the woman demands the man be killed, is the law is enacted?

Under natural law of being and becoming via procreation, an eye for an eye demands a life for life.

Would certain legal positions of abortion legislation allow one to invoke the sentence of natural law for survival, and kill the perpetrator?




In days of yore, alms were food and clothes. One's dwelling was not of concern; go away, goodbye.
War, famine, pestilence, death, were staved by order, practice, writual.
Procreation is the manner known to cognizant beings by which they both be, and, become.
It is obsession for control, for survival, to avoid unaffirming the eternal.