I don't see a line of Conservative Christian White families to adopt a African American Baby today. Or A Crack Baby, Or a baby with Down Syndrom.
I see White Christians who would rather go to China then have a Black Baby in their home.

You ALL want to bring Thousands and Thousands of Children into the world. But None of you want to take care of them once they are here. You Republican Conservatives are ALL for Cutting Taxes for the Poor. Cut Welfare for what you call The Lazy. Well this is the Money for ALL your Babies you want to bring into the world.

How are we supposed to take care of them, Raise them for years with no Money???? (I want a God Dam Answer)...........

Who will adopt these thousands and thousands of children. ( A Year) Do the math... You All say thousands a year are being killed. So lets stop Abortion, NOW.. Thousands a year need Parents for the rest of their lives. And all the things kids need.

I want a ANSWER to who will do all those things. for the rest of their lives. From Diapers to College!!!! All the crap you Conservative"s think you have all the answer's for..... [/b]

__________________
Russ....

Poorly stated but a (*)(*)(*)(*) good point. Probably a better reason than "women's rights". Population explosion is also a valid argument. The Chinese drastically changed their society by forced population curbs. As a result everyone in China is better off (?). But all that ignores respect for human life (assuming the fetus is a person). So does respect for human life outweigh the good of mankind? I don't know.

__________________
"Civilizations die from suicide, not murder." Arnold Toynbee

There are plenty of other ways to keep population under control that do not make life trivial. All kinds of birth control and contraceptives are available and affordable. And I'd wager to say that a vast majority of unwanted births do not result from malfunctions of these products. Plus there are plenty of people who would like to adopt, just too much red tape in their way.
America and Europe have stable or declining populations and abortions are not a major part in that.
For one thing, the people who have the most accidental children tend to be in demographic groups that are opposed to abortion. And the people who don't overpopulate have a tendency to be more responsible and avoid having children.
I don't think abortion should be accepted unless it's a case in which the mother's health is in danger or the baby is overwhelmingly likely to be stillborn or born with a mortal or brain-damaged condition.

__________________
"It's never over... BOY!"
The Tall Man, Phantasm III

Weak and pathetic excuses for abortion show me what selfish, arrogant and souless people many of you are. What poor excuses for human beings you are.
Aside from the obvious solutions, self-control, use of condoms and adoption how about at least trying to abstain, if you cannot, please do not use murder as a way out.
I ask you this; at what moment do sperm, egg and fetus become viable human beings with the right to life and laws to protect them? There MUST be an hour, minute or second when one becomes human and deserving of protection and one when you are just removing simple cells that have no rights or protection.?
Is it abortion when the child is in the womans womb and attached with an umbilicle cord and murder when the child has been delivered and the cord cut? Someone please explain to me when this transformation takes place?
To me the only difference between an abortion and pure murder is words written on a document, instruments used and location. A nice clean doctors office and the use of medical intrruments or a dark ally and the use of a knife or gun. In both circumstances the end result is the same; the taking of human life. Both are murder.
I believe that life begins at conception, the sperm and egg combine and are given a soul by God. Because of the way these cells look and a human baby has a form that looks like us should make no difference. Sadly I think that our eyes and the way something looks to us allow us to feel no guilt while the fetus would cause us to feel guilt and the knowlege you have commited a vicious crime, murder. The term abortion eases our guilt while murder condem us. They are one in the same, murder.
What hollow and corrupt souls many of you have to use terms that ease you from knowing you have willfully commited premeditated murder of your own flesh and blood! A challenge for when cells become human has been given! Any takers?

__________________
Christian, moderate conservative, willing to consider other points of view and compromise when appropriate.

ok lemme break this down by paragraph

I -- Just because you dont see conservative christian families adopting black babies doesnt mean that they dont. That just means you dont see it happening. If you are trying to make this a racial issue, id have to say you are just another diseased liberal. And who says its only the conservative christian families that can adopt? I dont really see where you are going with this.

II -- If you are talking about conservatives "bringing thousands and thousands of children into the world" as for being against abortion, the parents are the ones bringing the kids into the world, not the people against killing them in the womb. Poverty is not an inhereted disease, its a state of financial being that is well curable. Who says the poor are lazy? Last time I remember my great grandfather came to america with seven dollars in his pocket and worked his ass off just to feed his two kids every day. He was very poor, but not lazy at all. Poor can be fixed by hard work but cannot be fixed by patching leaks. "Give a man a fish and he will eat for a day (welfare), teach a man to fish (hard work) and he will eat for a lifetime".

III -- Conservatives are not fully against help for our nations poor, but we are against the fruitless doling out of funds as quick fixes. And you are acting like, as a previous poster said, abortion is the only way to keep population low. Its been declining and abortion is not a main factor in that equation.

IV -- I dont see where you are going with this. You are assuming unwanted babies cannot be cared for by their parents. How about people start taking responsibilty for their children (unless cases like rape or things along those lines) and stop using the system which isnt set up to adopt every kid a parent doesnt have time/patience to care for.

V -- Like I said before, if people stopped taking advantage of the system and doing work then we wouldnt have this problem in the first place. This is what liberals do not understand. It is human nature to take advantage of the system, and what liberals are for is the boosting of this system with another system that will be taken advantage of. Its a cycle. Make adoption qualifications, get rid of this abortion (unless as i said before in medically or legally diverse situations), and make people pay for their own (*)(*)(*)(*) kids. Tax payers didnt get drunk and have your illegit baby to a guy they dont even know, why should they have to bother putting the little (*)(*)(*)(*) through life? If the sex is a choice, the parents are responsible, not the state.

Very well thought out and explained. Mirrors and splinters sure are lacking in the liberal population. From the content of your message I know you understand my play on words; I just hope that the liberals do!
Keep up the great work.
dano

__________________
Christian, moderate conservative, willing to consider other points of view and compromise when appropriate.

You say that abortion is needed to keep population in control, well i say keeping your fly zipped and not having crazy sex all over might help. So you say that by making an unethical decision by having sex before marriage that you should follow that up by having the child killed.

Yes, condoms and good sex ed can and have prevented unwanted pregnancies in the past. OH WAIT, you oppose that too.

What economic standards must one meet in order to be considered a life worthy enough to live per liberals?