Political Forum
     

Go Back   Political Forum > Political Issues > Abortion


Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #31 (permalink)  
Old 03-10-2008, 02:40 AM
shadowman shadowman is offline
Contributor
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Posts: 112
shadowman is on a distinguished road
Credits: 496
Default

[quote=Sharon Tate;451153]A baby does not have to live with, or even see it's mother after birth in order to survive.

I did not say it did, however a baby is till not independant.

It does not use her body to survive, it is very much independant FROM the mother.

I never said it needed the mother after birth, however it is STILL not independant. Your reason for killing life inside the womb because it relies on you still is not fair. A baby still needs someone to rely on outside the womb.

Although it relies on people to feed it and nourish it, it no longer uses another persons body to sustain life.

Wrong they are using their bodies to help that child to survive. When they change that child, feed that child, or whatever they are using their bodies. They just don't say this is an inconvience I will kill this child.
Reply With Quote
Sponsored Links
Red Cross - Donate Today    Save the Rainforest
  #32 (permalink)  
Old 03-10-2008, 02:48 AM
Sharon Tate's Avatar
Sharon Tate Sharon Tate is offline
Correspondent
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Australia
Age: 24
Posts: 252
australia au victoria
Sharon Tate will become famous soon enough
Credits: 1,087
Default

The fetus is not using their nutrients and bodily resources, which is the entire point, and one which you seem to be ignoring.
__________________
Sharon Marie Tate: January 24 1943 - 9 August 1969
Forever Remembered
Reply With Quote
  #33 (permalink)  
Old 03-10-2008, 02:52 AM
shadowman shadowman is offline
Contributor
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Posts: 112
shadowman is on a distinguished road
Credits: 496
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Sharon Tate View Post
The fetus is not using their nutrients and bodily resources, which is the entire point, and one which you seem to be ignoring.

I am not ignoring anything the child is still not independant a point that you seem to be ignoring.
Reply With Quote
  #34 (permalink)  
Old 03-11-2008, 01:51 AM
Sharon Tate's Avatar
Sharon Tate Sharon Tate is offline
Correspondent
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Australia
Age: 24
Posts: 252
australia au victoria
Sharon Tate will become famous soon enough
Credits: 1,087
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by shadowman View Post
I am not ignoring anything the child is still not independant a point that you seem to be ignoring.
It is independant meaning it can survive WITHOUT the aid of the mother. This is what we mean when we say a baby is independant. Do you not grasp this very important point, or can't you read?
__________________
Sharon Marie Tate: January 24 1943 - 9 August 1969
Forever Remembered
Reply With Quote
  #35 (permalink)  
Old 03-11-2008, 02:51 AM
shadowman shadowman is offline
Contributor
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Posts: 112
shadowman is on a distinguished road
Credits: 496
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Sharon Tate View Post
It is independant meaning it can survive WITHOUT the aid of the mother. This is what we mean when we say a baby is independant. Do you not grasp this very important point, or can't you read?
There is no need for sarcasm, I am quite frankly disappointed in you, there is no need for rudeness. I know you probably get frustrated with me, as I you but this is still no excuse to be rude. You know very well I can read I have been debating this topic with you for quite a while now. Can you not grasp the fact that a baby is still not independant wether it needs it mother or not. To be independant means to be able to survive on your own without help a baby cannot do this.
Reply With Quote
  #36 (permalink)  
Old 03-11-2008, 04:11 AM
BillyBob BillyBob is offline
Banned
Guru
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Music City USA
Posts: 6,127
usa us tennessee
BillyBob has a reputation beyond reputeBillyBob has a reputation beyond reputeBillyBob has a reputation beyond reputeBillyBob has a reputation beyond reputeBillyBob has a reputation beyond reputeBillyBob has a reputation beyond reputeBillyBob has a reputation beyond reputeBillyBob has a reputation beyond reputeBillyBob has a reputation beyond reputeBillyBob has a reputation beyond reputeBillyBob has a reputation beyond repute
Credits: 6,807
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Sharon Tate View Post
It is independant meaning it can survive WITHOUT the aid of the mother. This is what we mean when we say a baby is independant.
A baby is not independent, a 2 year old is not independent, a 5 year old is not independent.

My teenager boys aren't independent! But the day is soon coming.....
Reply With Quote
  #37 (permalink)  
Old 03-11-2008, 08:11 AM
JMS's Avatar
JMS JMS is offline
Guru
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: California
Posts: 4,103
usa us california
JMS has a brilliant futureJMS has a brilliant futureJMS has a brilliant futureJMS has a brilliant futureJMS has a brilliant futureJMS has a brilliant futureJMS has a brilliant futureJMS has a brilliant futureJMS has a brilliant futureJMS has a brilliant futureJMS has a brilliant future
Credits: 16,696
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by shadowman View Post
There is no need for sarcasm, I am quite frankly disappointed in you, there is no need for rudeness. I know you probably get frustrated with me, as I you but this is still no excuse to be rude. You know very well I can read I have been debating this topic with you for quite a while now. Can you not grasp the fact that a baby is still not independant wether it needs it mother or not. To be independant means to be able to survive on your own without help a baby cannot do this.
the baby doesnt have its own body (in that sense, it isnt independent). babies who cant take care of themselves are still independent in the sense that they dont have to be in a womans womb. in a pregnant womans case, if you remove the fetus before its viable, itll die; no matter how much you care for it or how much medical attention it receives, itll die if its not yet a distinct body.
__________________
Quote:
Originally Posted by superdude17* View Post
f0ca1 refuses to erase my name from his signature....I believe that b/c I am a member, if I ask for him to remove it, he should. Of course, most normal and sympathetic individuals would have enough common courtesy to respect what other members have asked, but f0ca1 has again and again denied my attempts.
Reply With Quote
  #38 (permalink)  
Old 03-11-2008, 10:59 AM
manifold manifold is offline
Observer
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Posts: 57
manifold is on a distinguished road
Credits: 248
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by hidden View Post
There is not one single argument to justify abortion.
I would never attempt to justify the act of abortion. Personally, I find it reprehensible and as wicked a sin as there is. But I am still pro-choice and IMO, there is justification for allowing a woman to choose. In fact, more so than there is justification to not allow her to choose.

It's pretty simple. As a general rule, I don't support any laws that restrict an individual from doing anything that doesn't intrude on the life, liberty or pursuit of happiness of another. And therein lies the conflict of abortion. If I support a law forcing a woman to carry to term and give birth, I'm violating this rule. But also, the argument can be made that allowing her to abort violates the rule too, because it intrudes on the life, liberty and pursuit of happiness of her unborn child. However, this argument is flawed because allowing her to abort requires no law whatsoever. And even if we remove that distinction, we are still left with a conflict. Whose rights trump whose? And in this case, I just can't see how the life, liberty and pursuit of happiness of the unborn can possibly supercede that of the already born.

Or to put it another way, if an ignorant, life-hating wh ore wants to kill her own unborn baby, it's between her, her conscience, and her god. Leave me out of it.

Last edited by manifold; 03-11-2008 at 11:00 AM.
Reply With Quote
  #39 (permalink)  
Old 03-11-2008, 03:07 PM
kuta777's Avatar
kuta777 kuta777 is offline
Sr. Correspondent
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Nebraska
Posts: 425
usa us nebraska
kuta777 will become famous soon enough
Credits: 1,535
Default

get used to it shadowman, sharon won't prove you wrong but she will say you are stupid. Since the fetus can't survive on its own, apparently it is ok to kill it. So what about every other person that can't survive on their own. Should a mother have a right to murder her mentally retarded child just because it can't live on its own?
__________________
"Your old road is Rapidly agin'.
Please get out of the new one
If you can't lend your hand
For the times they are a-changin'."

"There's a battle outside
And it is ragin'.
It'll soon shake your windows
And rattle your walls
For the times they are a-changin'."

-Bob Dylan, greatest singer/songwriter ever to live.
Reply With Quote
  #40 (permalink)  
Old 03-11-2008, 05:27 PM
JMS's Avatar
JMS JMS is offline
Guru
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: California
Posts: 4,103
usa us california
JMS has a brilliant futureJMS has a brilliant futureJMS has a brilliant futureJMS has a brilliant futureJMS has a brilliant futureJMS has a brilliant futureJMS has a brilliant futureJMS has a brilliant futureJMS has a brilliant futureJMS has a brilliant futureJMS has a brilliant future
Credits: 16,696
Default

"yes, a mother should be able to kill her child whether its in or out of her womb, no matter how old or how healthy. newborn? no problem. 3 years old? sure. teenager? even better. kill, kill, kill!"

do you guys really believe your comparisons are fair? no one is saying the above statements...
__________________
Quote:
Originally Posted by superdude17* View Post
f0ca1 refuses to erase my name from his signature....I believe that b/c I am a member, if I ask for him to remove it, he should. Of course, most normal and sympathetic individuals would have enough common courtesy to respect what other members have asked, but f0ca1 has again and again denied my attempts.

Last edited by JMS; 03-11-2008 at 05:28 PM.
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are Off
Forum Jump

Sponsored Links

All times are GMT -8. The time now is 08:51 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.7.1
Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
LinkBacks Enabled by vBSEO 3.1.0
Template-Modifikationen durch TMS
vBCredits v1.3 ©2007 by Darkwaltz4
Advertisement System V2.1 By   Branden