Thread: My argument against pro lifers

Originally Posted by churchmouse

Yes I know…..and you denied them personhood one second BEFORE THEY WERE BORN. ?????????????????

WHAT HAPPENED IN THAT ONE MINUTE WHAT ALL OF A SUDDEN YOU WOULD WNAT TO PROTECT

Coming into the world is a pretty significant happening.

Originally Posted by cady

coming into the world is a pretty significant happening.

and ???????????

Originally Posted by Cady

Coming into the world is a pretty significant happening.

Why in the world would you of all people think that being born would be special?

Originally Posted by churchmouse

Why in the world would you of all people think that being born would be special?

well, because that would take them out of the danger of the killers being able to destroy and kill them.
actually, there is no difference between the baby the day before birth, and the day after, other than how it receives it nourishment and oxygen, thru a feeding tube, just like alot of people in hospitals. I guess we can go and kill them to eh?

Originally Posted by The DARK LORD

actually, there is no difference between the baby the day before birth, and the day after, other than how it receives it nourishment and oxygen, thru a feeding tube, just like alot of people in hospitals.

Here's the fallacy in your thinking. A pregnant woman is not just some life support machine. She is a fully established person with the right to bodily autonomy and self determination. A person without those rights is a slave.

Originally Posted by Cady

Here's the fallacy in your thinking. A pregnant woman is not just some life support machine. She is a fully established person with the right to bodily autonomy and self determination. A person without those rights is a slave.

Could you stand next to the doctor who kills a nine month old in the fetus?

I mean seriously could you do it?

Originally Posted by Cady

Here's the fallacy in your thinking. A pregnant woman is not just some life support machine. She is a fully established person with the right to bodily autonomy and self determination. A person without those rights is a slave.

Its not about the woman.
Either the unborn is a human person or not. If it is, there is no arguement for abortion.

If it isnt a human person, then there is no arguement against abortion.
Now, on the other hand, pro abortionists, and many people in general claim they would like to see abortion reduced, but WHY? If its not a person, and only a part of her body, then it wouldnt be any different than having your tonsils removed. Why should anyone care. ? THE ANSWER IS BECAUSE THE PRO ABORTIONISTS ARE LIARS.

The fallacy with your arguement is you have no arguement. You start saying its the womans body.....but that is not in response to my post. My post establishes how the same basic human, one unborn, and the next day it is born, is treated diametrically opposife of each other, like as though one is a devil, and one is an angel, when in fact, its still the same exact being. SAME EXACT BEING.

And temporary usage of anothers body to keep another alive is NOT slavery. She had already consented to it. But you bring up "slavery" ohhhh, shudder, we cant enslave anyone, nice emotional arguement.
You use emotional arguements because you have nothing else. "Its her body",,," you cant enslave her",,,,but one problem is, rights of two individuals come into conflict all the tiime, and one has to prevail,
and always, the right to life prevails, except you the lonely delusional lie infested world of baby killing abortionists who hide behind the monikers like "womens rights" and "freedom of choice"

Its all a bunch of BS, and those who do it are full of BS, and on top of it all, you cant even respond to my post.
You sound like a freaking politician,
"well mr president, how do you stand on the death penalty?"
The PResident "Oh, well, I think the commerce law will prevail and effect every one equally, I believe in equality"

you use emotionally laden phrases because it requires no thinking, its appealing to peoples emotions, and you cant stand up to the science on the issue.

Originally Posted by churchmouse

Could you stand next to the doctor who kills a nine month old in the fetus?

I mean seriously could you do it?

well of course its the womans choice.. freedom to choose,,,,

Originally Posted by churchmouse

Could you stand next to the doctor who kills a nine month old in the fetus?

I mean seriously could you do it?

I support abortion to save the life/health of the mother, and for fetal abnormality incompatible with life.

Originally Posted by Cady

I support abortion to save the life/health of the mother, and for fetal abnormality incompatible with life.

You did not answer my question…LOL

Could you stand next to a doctor and watch him….perform an abortion?

And you are pro-choice…which means you condone abortion all through pregnancy. Rembmer Cady…its the woman's rights. LOL

Answer the question if you have the guts.