Thread: My argument against pro lifers

Originally Posted by Cady

I answered the question clearly. I answered it twice. I don't intend to participate in your game that goes like this:

1) Ask a loaded question

2) Badger someone in post after post to answer your question

3) Pretend someone didn't answer your question or didn't answer adequately

4) Demand they answer the question on your terms

5. Berate them endlessly for an answer that doesn't reflect your beliefs

This bullying tactic shows you can't debate the abortion issue honestly and that you are here only to bully, lecture and berate those who disagree with you.

Well, you did answer one question, why somebody in their right mind could support abortion, and it became obvious some simply arent in their right mind.
The type of response we have rec'd for our questions shows a scattered, non logical, non rational, artistic type of mind, where a person looks outside the box for solutions, but unfortunately, outside the box thinking is good when you need creative answers, but is worse than useless when dealing with issues that require thinking, logic and rationale.

Originally Posted by Unifier

LOL! You lefties always accuse us righties of being sooooooo insensitive and uncompassionate toward our fellow human beings. And then you turn around and criticize us for being compassionate toward the most helpless of our species.

Keep arguing with your feelings, kid. Milk that nihilistic teen angst for all it's worth.

if pro-lifers cared, they would care about the babies that are born into this world, their caring would not stop at the fetus stage

http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,151448,00.html


.

Originally Posted by FreshAir

if pro-lifers cared, they would care about the babies that are born into this world, their caring would not stop at the fetus stage

http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,151448,00.html


.

How silly, to assume they dont, to profile pro lifers as all the same,
and, do you help victims of car jacking? I mean, you do oppose car jacking, right?
see how that works.

Originally Posted by Cady

I answered the question clearly. I answered it twice. I don't intend to participate in your game that goes like this:

1) Ask a loaded question

2) Badger someone in post after post to answer your question

3) Pretend someone didn't answer your question or didn't answer adequately

4) Demand they answer the question on your terms

5. Berate them endlessly for an answer that doesn't reflect your beliefs

This bullying tactic shows you can't debate the abortion issue honestly and that you are here only to bully, lecture and berate those who disagree with you.

I will end it here…..but know this….YOU DID NOT ANSWER THE QUESTION AND YOU LOOK SILLY. YOU NEVER ONCE ADDRESSED THE QUESTION…..NOT ONCE.

SO RUN AND HIDE…BUT OTHERS CAN SEE WHAT YOUR DOING. EVEN DARK LORD SEES…..YA DIDN'T ANSWER.

Originally Posted by churchmouse

I will end it here…..but know this….YOU DID NOT ANSWER THE QUESTION AND YOU LOOK SILLY. YOU NEVER ONCE ADDRESSED THE QUESTION…..NOT ONCE.

SO RUN AND HIDE…BUT OTHERS CAN SEE WHAT YOUR DOING. EVEN DARK LORD SEES…..YA DIDN'T ANSWER.

6) Never admit game-playing. Accuse victim of running and hiding. Continue to berate endlessly.

Originally Posted by The DARK LORD

How silly, to assume they dont, to profile pro lifers as all the same,
and, do you help victims of car jacking? I mean, you do oppose car jacking, right?
see how that works.

I would never tell a victim of car jacking they had to car pool the car jacker

nor would I tell a rape victim thy had to have their rapists baby

the way the law is now it's in the middle, it should stay as is, neither side gets everything they want


.

Originally Posted by Cady

6) Never admit game-playing. Accuse victim of running and hiding. Continue to berate endlessly.

You did not answer the question and you ran. Oh I am ending it….your silence speaks volumes.

Originally Posted by churchmouse

You did not answer the question and you ran. Oh I am ending it….your silence speaks volumes.

Three times. My last answer was here, which you responded to at 11:26:

Originally Posted by Cady
I have answered this twice. Here is one answer I gave before: "Remember, I don't believe a fetus is a person, so I don't know why you think it would be hard for me to watch." Is there anyone who can't figure out it means, "yes, I could watch"?

I think it would be much more difficult to watch a woman die who was denied an abortion. That is what happens in countries where abortion is illegal. In some countries where abortion is illegal with no exceptions, many women die from horribly painful ruptured ectopic pregnancies. I wouldn't want to watch that.

Originally Posted by churchmouse

Well look who is here….(*)(*)(*)(*). LOL

And then you posted here at 11:28, continuing to claim that I "ran" and didn't answer. But then, that's game rule #3, so why would I expect anything different?

Originally Posted by Cady

6) Never admit game-playing. Accuse victim of running and hiding. Continue to berate endlessly.

7) Never employ the use of a real argument

Always relate one's position to emotionalism and intuitive character attacks.

Sorry for the late reply.

Originally Posted by PatrickT

I love your logic. If I find a depressed high school student--not tough to do--who has no interest in being alive, I am, according to you, free to kill them. How fascinating.

You've made a major error, and haven't understood what I have written. You cant kill the student, because in being depressed they many not actually be seeking their real interests.

Originally Posted by PatrickT

But, before we actually reach that step, we will start killing old people for the benefit and convenience of liberals. Oh, Chuck can't work any longer, can't have any kids I have to support, so we don't need him. Kill him.

How is my position supportive of that?

Originally Posted by PatrickT

My problem with pro-choice radicals is that they see themselves and their personal convenience as the center of the universe, the driving force for all decisions. Pitiful really.

Ok, but have you noticed how logic and reason are the center of my argument here, not self indulgence?

Originally Posted by PatrickT

This does encapsulate the liberal concept of "fair" that we hear so much about. "We're perfectly willing to let you not kill as long as you'r willing to let us kill. That's fair." We can follow that with, "We're perfectly willing to let you work and support us if your willing to let us not work and be supported."

This is all nice opinion of yours, buts its entirely irrelevant. Instead of getting upset about "liberals" perhaps you should re-read my argument so you can actually comprehend it and then 'critique' it.