Page 2 of 9 FirstFirst 123456 ... LastLast
Results 11 to 20 of 82

Thread: Thumbs up to infanticide.

  1. Default

    Quote Originally Posted by MegadethFan View Post
    bahahaha baby gonna cry? Nice to see he is sooo incorrect you cant even make an attempt at showing how he is wrong.
    I'll chloroform him before I cap him - that way he won't be able to show any conscious interest in being alive - so it'll be justifiable

  2. Likes politicalcenter liked this post

  3. Default

    Quote Originally Posted by SpaceCricket79 View Post
    I'll chloroform him before I cap him - that way he won't be able to show any conscious interest in being alive - so it'll be justifiable
    But he will still have the capacity to have an interest. What's more you are violating his autonomy, not to mention the preexisting pursuit of his interests.

    Incidentally, you clearly aren't "pro-life." LOL Ignorant and contradictory - you lifers are hilarious.
    Last edited by MegadethFan; Jun 17 2012 at 10:28 PM.
    ---------------------------
    I'm willing to change my position at any time on any issue. I have done so in the past. All you need is a logical, provable case, and I'm all in. The question is, have you got what it takes?
    Oh, and just so you're not confused, I'm an apatheist libertarian.

    "If we don't believe in freedom of expression for people we despise, we don't believe in it at all." --Noam Chomsky

  4. Default

    Quote Originally Posted by MegadethFan View Post
    But he will still have the capacity to have an interest.
    As fetuses do have a capacity to have an interest, assuming their drug addict baby mommies don't murder them for convenience.

    What's more you are violating his autonomy, not to mention the preexisting pursuit of his interests.
    As abortion does to innocent babies, yes.


    Incidentally, you clearly aren't "pro-life." LOL Ignorant and contradictory - you lifers are hilarious.
    I only support innocent life, not that which is evil, such as Josef Meng... I mean Mike Tooley.

  5. #14

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by SpaceCricket79 View Post
    Mike Tooley is a degenerate who deserves a 51st trimester abortion - with a Colt .45.
    That sound like a very "pro life" comment!

    NOT!

  6. Default

    Quote Originally Posted by SpaceCricket79 View Post
    As fetuses do have a capacity to have an interest, assuming their drug addict baby mommies don't murder them for convenience.
    Once again you are completely wrong. They have no such capacity until 26-28 days AFTER BIRTH.

    Quote Originally Posted by SpaceCricket79 View Post
    As abortion does to innocent babies, yes.
    No, because a fetus is not autonomous from its mother - an infant is, but the infant still has no interest in its existence until 26 days as mentioned above.

    Quote Originally Posted by SpaceCricket79 View Post
    I only support innocent life, not that which is evil, such as Josef Meng... I mean Mike Tooley.
    Exactly, so you're not pro-life. You're "supportive of some life."
    Last edited by MegadethFan; Jun 17 2012 at 10:54 PM.
    ---------------------------
    I'm willing to change my position at any time on any issue. I have done so in the past. All you need is a logical, provable case, and I'm all in. The question is, have you got what it takes?
    Oh, and just so you're not confused, I'm an apatheist libertarian.

    "If we don't believe in freedom of expression for people we despise, we don't believe in it at all." --Noam Chomsky

  7. Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Sadanie View Post
    That sound like a very "pro life" comment!

    NOT!
    I'm not pro-life - I'm pro-innocent life. Live by the sword, die by the sword I say.

    Leftists sound quite "pro-life" when they defend of a convicted pedophile/rapist/murderer against the death penalty, but won't give the same rights to an innocent child.

  8. Default

    Quote Originally Posted by MegadethFan View Post
    Once again you are completely wrong. They have no such capacity until 26-28 days AFTER BIRTH.
    Right, then I'll keep him in a medically-induced coma lasting for 26-28 days - therefore I can execute him in that time and it'll be morally justifiable, since he has no interest in remaining alive in his comatose state.

    No, because a fetus is not autonomous from its mother - an infant is, but the infant still has no interest in its existence until 26 days as mentioned above.
    While in a comatose state he would not be autonomous of whoever is providing him care/life support. lol

    Exactly, so you're not pro-life. You're "supportive of some life."
    Correct - those who deny rights of others deserve them not for themselves.

  9. Default

    Anyone who defends infanticide is no better than a NAMBLA member.

  10. Default

    Megadeth---to me your posts are very honest. I think that most avid pro-abortion people on this board share your views----as they don't dispute them. And I think that ultimately abortion is simply the devaluation of children. In general--if children are devalued then the "me" mentality which is the liberal position---can flourish. Not just for abortion but in many policies such as changing the focus for marriage, co-habitation, etc. Any sacrifice for a fetus, newborn or child who does not offer obvious gratification to its care-taker is abhorrent to liberals who want policies that worship the "self".

    It would be interesting to see if some fanatical abortion believers will at least be a little appalled over the killing of newborns. So far---no.

  11. Likes TheHat, Unifier, SpaceCricket79 liked this post
  12. #20

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by SpaceCricket79 View Post
    Anyone who defends infanticide is no better than a NAMBLA member.
    But these people probably think child rape is ok.

Page 2 of 9 FirstFirst 123456 ... LastLast

Tags for this Thread

Bookmarks

Bookmarks