Thread: World’s First Of It’s Kind Surgery Saves Miami Girl’s(*)Life

Hmmmm.

At 17 weeks of pregnancy, we are performing in utero surgeries on babies to remove tumors, but the pro-death crowd around here wants us all to believe "it" is just a clump of cells. Strange how reality doesn't coincide with their "belief" system.

http://miami.cbslocal.com/2012/06/21...mi-girls-life/

how in the heck can the parents sign a consent when there is no life on which to perform the surgery? And, since it's not a child, how can a surgical consent form be signed for the "child"? It is after all just a bunch of goo, a fetus/foetus/zygote/clump of cells and something which must be terminated at all costs

I am outraged that this expensive surgery was performed on a worthless clump of cells. They should have just gone to planned parenthood and made a "choice"

I'll be glad when Obamacare is here and surgeries such as this are not approved by the death panels. Woops, I mean the choice panels

My instinct reading this isn't to jump to the politics of abortion but to simply appreciate a human story of a happy family and impressive medical expertise. This child seems to be even less than a clump of cells to you, just a tool to use in your political games.

Originally Posted by HonestJoe

My instinct reading this isn't to jump to the politics of abortion but to simply appreciate a human story of a happy family and impressive medical expertise.

So was mine. As always.

This child seems to be even less than a clump of cells to you, just a tool to use in your political games.

I suggest you run around this section more often, I am not the one condoning infanticide and killing babies. Like some of the folks who "like" your comment.

Originally Posted by TheHat

I suggest you run around this section more often, I am not the one condoning infanticide and killing babies. Like some of the folks who "like" your comment.

No, you are the one falsely accusing others of "condoning infanticide" and "killing babies."

Originally Posted by HonestJoe

My instinct reading this isn't to jump to the politics of abortion but to simply appreciate a human story of a happy family and impressive medical expertise. This child seems to be even less than a clump of cells to you, just a tool to use in your political games.

there in itself is a problem. if you are to not be attacked in this sub section then you must accept that the child isn't a child.........do you follow me?

It's a zygote, fetus, foetus, bag o cells, pile of goo etc.

So, this surgery should never have happened because there was no life on which to perform surgery.

Originally Posted by Cady

No, you are the one falsely accusing others of "condoning infanticide" and "killing babies."

please splain me this

how could the Drs have performed surgery on that which is not alive?

That a surgery was performed does not in any way prove that a fetus must be a person at the time. We also perform surgeries on animals. Does not make them persons.

Originally Posted by Blasphemer

That a surgery was performed does not in any way prove that a fetus must be a person at the time. We also perform surgeries on animals. Does not make them persons.

Um, I don't think I can honestly answer this absurdity....lol.

What um, what were you trying to say here again? Your comment makes no sense.

I am pretty sure all medical surgeries done in a hospital, are done on people blasphemer. I really don't know what else to tell ya here....lol.

We perform surgeries on animals too, but we don't call the animals anything else then what they are either.

Originally Posted by Blasphemer

That a surgery was performed does not in any way prove that a fetus must be a person at the time. We also perform surgeries on animals. Does not make them persons.

hmmm, so for instance, a dog receives surgery. I get that because the dog is alive

with that said, since this is nothing more than a growth, a parasite, a bag of goo, a clump of cells, a zygote, a foetus, a fetus, an inconvenience ........anything but alive then how in the heck should surgery have been allowed?

Are we now performing surgery on bags of cells?

it clearly wasn't a child

the mom and dad could not be treated as the parents of something which isn't alive or isn't human, so how could any of this have happened?