Most would not be bothered by it, but some die hard pro lifers would certainly be against it.

__________________
Sharon Marie Tate: January 24 1943 - 9 August 1969
Forever Remembered

Here, Here, but try to tell that to the Christian Masochist.

they wont listen because if they have any doubt they will suffer in hell for all eternity for not using their "free will" as god intended. of course, god already knows what theyre all going to do, because he can see the future, but he likes to hold off on putting people in their places until theyve died. its a lot more fun that way.

__________________
Remedial English - Rule #2:

Always check your answers against Google search results.

I believe life to be a test and a series of trials. We must prove our loyalty to God. Sometimes God takes people away from us and this maybe him testing us, and how we react. My family has experienced such a loss though we do not blame God for it, it was his will we must have faith in him.

You make religious people sound unreasonable, as if religious people do not use logic, or they do not question things all these things are wrong. Religious people use reasoning and logic just the same as people who are non-religious. We do have free will, just because God knows all it still does not mean we do not make decisions for ourselves. Remember most of the greatest minds that ever lived, believed in a God or acosmic deity. As I have said before I don't know though if it was on this forum or another, Albert Einstein once said "religion without science is lame, science without religion is blind".

Dear B.L. Zeebub:

I would wager your question is posed to be a logic trap, designed to cause Christians to some how implode, and you can kick it with your homeboyz, marveling at how smart you are, to have asked such a question.

I would like to point out that the question is neither original in its wording or unique in it's perspective.

Can God create a rock so big, he can not lift it?
Can God say, Thou shall not murder, and yet kill all the first born of Egypt?

A better question to ask is this:

"What is man, that thou art mindful of him?"

(Psa 8:4)
And I find this one good:
Job 40:1,2

"Moreover the LORD answered Job, and said, Shall he that contendeth with the Almighty instruct him? he that reproveth God, let him answer it."

But just so you don't get distracted with the source of my questions, lets assume that the Bible is just a good book about God and not some sacred scripture. Lets take away the claims the Bible makes on it self, and just answer the questions. If there is a God and he created men and earth, and all living things, then how would you answer these questions?

Oh, and one more thing: Lets assume you are not a mindless trog, and actually have something to say out of your own head. If you are going to spam me with ad-hom's to shock-and-awe me by your typing ability, don't bother.

__________________
"I know no method to secure the repeal of bad or obnoxious laws so effective as their stringent execution." March 4, 1869, Grant's First Inaugural Address

it was meant as a commentary on the religion, not so much the people. i know religious people can reason. if i really believed in the bible id be stupid not to do as im told. i sure wouldnt wanna go to hell if i believed it were a real place. but i dont believe, thats just me.

__________________
Remedial English - Rule #2:

Always check your answers against Google search results.

Thank you for your response,I assume it was made in "good faith" but I find your first para and the use of "Homeboyz" puerile, it panders to an irrelevant subculture that is alien to me, and my adult acolytes, and therefore devalues the rest in "my eyes," what age are you?
I then presume your are refering to my "disciples", they, try to impress me!

As I have a thirst for knowledge, I asked questions?, thank you again for your response, but as you seem to "major" in analysis, may I give you a prompt, I follow Edward De Bono, both in question and answer!

You can assume anything you wish. But I really fail to see where your opening sentence in your paragraph addresses the topic at hand. My “question” asked if you had any logical response to the statement I quoted from the Bible. But I will read on, maybe you put the main point at the end of your paragraph.
,
So if you weren’t a MENSA grand marshal and leader of all that is known to man, then you might be able to talk down to us simple folk and just say: Your use of street language was silly and I don’t see how that relates to the point.
I think you are saying, but I am not sure, because I am not that smart, so please permit me: My friends and I feel that your use of street lingo diminishes your reputation and calls into question what other points you may make.
Honestly, this was too cryptic for me. Can you dumb this one down for me? Please? (“Referring” has two “r’s”, I have typo’s now and again, myself.)
,
More honestly: I have not seen this kind of posting since I reviewed files of some serial rapists in my criminal justice courses. Why are your posts geared towards fostering sexual conversation? Do you get off on the responses?
You are quite welcome. Can I ask you if you are a convicted sex offender? Just curious…
Way to speak for yourself! I can’t wait to read all about Mr. De Bono. (Wondering if my prediction of what the main theme of his writings will be correct.)

__________________
"I know no method to secure the repeal of bad or obnoxious laws so effective as their stringent execution." March 4, 1869, Grant's First Inaugural Address

Very interesting person.

Did I find your posts a plus to me or anything in my world? No. Did I find your posts a minus to anything important to me? Yes. Did I find your posts interesting? No, not really. Kind of irrelevant in a sort of a Freudian kind of way.
Did I consider all the factors? Yes. This is a political forum and all the topics we talk about here can be related to sex, but not everything!
Did you violate any rules? Nope, none that I can see.
Are you hoping that we all hold you in high esteem as a consequence of posting these threads? I don't think your scoped out your objective before you began.
What were your aims, goals and objectives by posting all of these sex related threads? Just curious.
Is your first important priority to masturbate to some of the responses? Again, just curious.
Did you actually consider the alternative outcomes, the possibilities of a negative as well as a positive result? Could you have made better choices? Is there a better alternative? I hear Sen. Craig is still looking...
Did you consider other people's views when crafting these threads in this political forum? Did you carefully consider how B.L. Zeebub could possibly seal your own fate with the ruler of this universe? Or was that your objective? Just curious.

__________________
"I know no method to secure the repeal of bad or obnoxious laws so effective as their stringent execution." March 4, 1869, Grant's First Inaugural Address