![]() |
|
||||
|
Ive invented a new form of birth control, I place a pebble in one slipper and go limp.
There are many enjoyable sexual acts that do not require vaginal penetration,requests for information to Mrs B L Zeebub she will respond by plain envelope Which reminds me of the joke about the Rear Admirals virgin daughter who married an ablebodied Seaman. The night before the wedding the Rear Admiral had a chat with his daughter about sex, he ended with the statement that your future husband being a seaman may ask you to do it "the other way" he told her appart from it being a sin it hurt like hell! he would not explain further! For 6 months the newly weds were at it like rabbits, the noise of there passion could be heard all over the ship! One night after a very intense session she found herself bored with what had taken place, so looking for something different and not knowing what, she asked her husband in all innocence "lets do it the other way" His reply was "What and risk having babies |
|
||||
|
But could you live without having sex?
Quote:
Over here, because the fetus is not legally a person, it has no rights. Now, I myself don't believe a fetus is a person until birth, but at the same time, I would be horrified if a woman were made to lose her baby, and charges were not laid. At most, the charge would be assault causing grevious bodily harm - note the fetus is not mentioned? It's almost as if it doesn't exist, and in the eyes of our law, it doesn't. I would support fetal homocide laws, because if a woman intends to keep her child, no one has the right to take that choice from her. If fetal homocide laws were introduced in Australia, however, I would worry that the law regarding personhood would be changed, meaning the fetus is considered a person. I don't think this is the case in the US, though...can anyone from the US confirm whether or not a fetus is considered a person? If not, how does such a law as Fetal Homocide come into play, seeing the fetus is not a human being and therefore cannot be 'murdered'?
__________________
Why is it that, as a culture, we are more comfortable seeing two men holding guns than holding hands? ~ Ernest Gaines |
|
||||
|
Quote:
Rape is a justification for abortion, because the womans mental heath comes first. Her recovery from her ordeal is far more important than an unborn child.
__________________
Why is it that, as a culture, we are more comfortable seeing two men holding guns than holding hands? ~ Ernest Gaines |
|
||||
|
Quote:
|
|
||||
|
Quote:
__________________
This space for rent. |
|
|||
|
Sex is a desire, it is not a need.
That is my response to the abortionist supporter. The argument that people need sex and that abortion should be around because of "mistakes" By arguing that sex is a basic need, like air, food and water, you argue that we are essentially animals driven by our needs. We are of course driven by our needs...we all need air, food and water... Sex is a desire however, it is not necessary to sustain life. Last edited by Herkdriver; 05-09-2008 at 10:30 AM. |
![]() |
| Bookmarks | ||||||
Digg
|
del.icio.us
|
StumbleUpon
|
Google
|
Yahoo
|
Furl
|
Reddit
|
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Abortion | pearlgreta | Women's Rights | 58 | 10-17-2007 10:14 PM |
| Abortion | RED-CORNER | Opinion POLLS | 131 | 01-26-2007 06:11 AM |
| Abortion | poletree | Political Opinions & Beliefs | 191 | 02-21-2006 01:32 PM |
| Abortion | viper910 | Off-Topic Chat | 1 | 01-02-2006 02:23 PM |
| Abortion | cathezilla | Abortion | 28 | 10-28-2005 08:32 AM |