Quote:
Originally Posted by Kufnaka
I just decided to come back to this site after a several moth hiatus, and would like to bring up a new argument against abortion.
After several debates with my friends, it's become obvious that there's no logical way to reconcile abortion as murder with it being justified in cases of rape or maternal danger. Therefore, I've come to accept the fact that abortion is not murder. However, we can argue that the sole act of participating in sex makes the individual give 100% consent into birthing the child. At the same time, we can allow abortion in cases of rape/coerced incest without any moral contradiction because in these cases no consent was given to the sex and therefore not the birth. Also, because consenting to do a job doesn't mean you consent to getting cancer from poor work conditions, we are logically justified in in saying that women do not consent to possible death during childbirth when consenting to sex.
I'm really, truly trying to find a way to reconcile moral/religious arguments against abortion with logic and legality.
|
engaging in sex doesnt mean youre willing to have a child. i have no information to back this, but my guess is over 90% of all sex is for recreation and not reproduction. for many individuals, it is 100% for recreation.
heres a way to come to terms with it. realize that there is no specific moment at which life begins, and that the designation of any point as the beginning of life is simply a matter of opinion. people can put different types or stages of life on different levels, but when the beginning of life is is something i doubt we will ever know.
if youre of christian faith, the bible isnt anti abortion.