Political Forum
     

Go Back   Political Forum > Political Issues > Abortion


Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1 (permalink)  
Old 09-19-2005, 09:25 AM
cathezilla
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default Abortion

Abortion should only be legal if done so in the first trimester of pregnancy. After this, it is murder. What is the difference between a woman going to a hospital to kill her baby, and the husband of a wife pushing the woman down the stairs and killing hte baby?
Reply With Quote
Sponsored Links
Red Cross - Donate Today    Save the Rainforest
  #2 (permalink)  
Old 09-19-2005, 11:36 AM
politicalgeru
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default your wrong

Even befor the first trimester is killing! God created babies to live not to be killed!! It's so stupid, just have the kid. Abortion should be illegal always, easily said.
Reply With Quote
  #3 (permalink)  
Old 09-20-2005, 10:24 AM
apotropoxy apotropoxy is offline
Guru
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Posts: 3,483
apotropoxy is on a distinguished road
Credits: 17,056
Default Clarity

Abortion is not murder. A fetus does not live ndependent of its mother. Should a pregnant woman die in her sleep the night before she were to deliver, her fetus dies, too. The fetus becomes an independent entity at birth. Killing it at or after THAT point is murder.
If religionists are successful in their efforts to make abortion illegal the procedures will not end. They will go underground in the states which have prohibited them and the boarder states that permit abortion will have clinics at the state lines. The wealthy will get their abortions but the poor will be forced to carry their fetuses to term. We will see a growth of the number of children who live in poverty; a number disgracefully high in this wealthy land.
Reply With Quote
  #4 (permalink)  
Old 09-21-2005, 09:19 PM
Wildbore's Avatar
Wildbore Wildbore is offline
Commentator
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Thunder Bay, ON
Posts: 1,262
canada ca ontario
Wildbore has a spectacular aura aboutWildbore has a spectacular aura about
Credits: 8,962
Send a message via MSN to Wildbore
Default lol

Quote:
Originally Posted by cathezilla";p=&quot View Post
What is the difference between a woman going to a hospital to kill her baby, and the husband of a wife pushing the woman down the stairs and killing hte baby?
The difference is ones abortion, ones not and one is legal, the other is not.

Quote:
Originally Posted by apotropoxy";p=&quot View Post
Abortion is not murder.
I agree with you. Murder is a crime, a crime is a violation of the law, therefore, where abortion is not a violation of the law, the act of abortion is not murder.

Although murder by definition is the killing of one human being by another, therefore fetus' have to be human beings in order to murder them. However, it is no crime to lawfully kill another human being, therefore even if abortion inolves killing of human beings, it is still not murder because it is not a violation of the law.

So anyone that thinks abortion is murder should look at doctors registered to do abortions and see if any of them are getting charged with murder. NOPE!!!!

Quote:
Originally Posted by apotropoxy";p=&quot View Post
A fetus does not live ndependent of its mother.
If you or I kill a fetus, it may be murder. Outside the framework of an abortion by a registered clinic, it may still be murder to kill a fetus.
Reply With Quote
  #5 (permalink)  
Old 09-22-2005, 05:31 AM
apotropoxy apotropoxy is offline
Guru
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Posts: 3,483
apotropoxy is on a distinguished road
Credits: 17,056
Default Inhale

Quote:
Originally Posted by apotropoxy";p=&quot View Post
A fetus does not live independent of its mother.
If you or I kill a fetus, it may be murder. Outside the framework of an abortion by a registered clinic, it may still be murder to kill a fetus.[/quote]
Your comments speak the the current condition of some state laws and not to the ethical or philosophical question raised with this topic. Mine do. Since a fetus dies when a mother dies we can see that the fetus is entirely dependent on the mother-host for its viability. Once that fetus is born successfully, it is a baby and is capable of living its own life. I believe that it is at this point that killing is murder and not before.
Reply With Quote
  #6 (permalink)  
Old 09-25-2005, 09:18 PM
AmericanDreamer's Avatar
AmericanDreamer AmericanDreamer is offline
Observer
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Eastern USA
Posts: 24
usa us north carolina
AmericanDreamer is on a distinguished road
Credits: 285
Default your children are not your children

I consider it a human being from conception. Yeah we all know what the law says but that doesnt mean it is not murder, imo. As a woman who has bore children, I dont assume to own the child growing inside of my womb. It is a seperate entity, a unique individual with the will to live. I have no right to kill it simply because it is inconvenient or unwanted.

This is what is written in the chapter titled "Children" in the book "The Prophet" by Kahlil Gibran

Your children are not your children.
They are the sons and daughters of Life's longing for itself.
They come through you but not from you,
And though they are with you, yet they belong not to you.
You may give them your love but not your thoughts.
For they have their own thoughts.
You may house their bodies but not their souls,
For their souls dwell in the house of tomorrow, which you cannot visit, not even in your dreams.
You may strive to be like them, but seek not to make them like you.
For life goes not backward nor tarries with yesterday.
You are the bows from which your children as living arrows are sent forth.
The archer sees the mark upon the path of the infinite, and He bends you with His might that His arrows may go swift and far.
Let your bending in the archer's hand be for gladness;
For even as He loves the arrow that flies, so He loves also the bow that is stable.
Reply With Quote
  #7 (permalink)  
Old 09-26-2005, 11:36 AM
Wildbore's Avatar
Wildbore Wildbore is offline
Commentator
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Thunder Bay, ON
Posts: 1,262
canada ca ontario
Wildbore has a spectacular aura aboutWildbore has a spectacular aura about
Credits: 8,962
Send a message via MSN to Wildbore
Default WRONG

Quote:
Originally Posted by AmericanDreamer";p=&quot View Post
I have no right to kill it simply because it is inconvenient or unwanted.
Actually you have the right to kill it, or more specifically the right to consent to have a medical doctor remove the fetus or embryo. You may choose not to exercise that right, but nevertheless the right exists.

Quote:
Originally Posted by AmericanDreamer";p=&quot View Post
It is a seperate entity, a unique individual with the will to live. I have no right to kill it simply because it is inconvenient or unwanted.
A fetus may be an individual, but not even you treat it as one. You clearly declare that a fetus has the "will to live," but if the fetus were an individual shouldn't you let it decide its own will?

If you come up with an arguement that makes sense I may read your poem.
Reply With Quote
  #8 (permalink)  
Old 09-26-2005, 07:04 PM
AmericanDreamer's Avatar
AmericanDreamer AmericanDreamer is offline
Observer
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Eastern USA
Posts: 24
usa us north carolina
AmericanDreamer is on a distinguished road
Credits: 285
Default hypocritical

Quote:
Originally Posted by Wildbore";p=&quot View Post
Quote:
Originally Posted by AmericanDreamer";p=&quot View Post
I have no right to kill it simply because it is inconvenient or unwanted.
Actually you have the right to kill it, or more specifically the right to consent to have a medical doctor remove the fetus or embryo. You may choose not to exercise that right, but nevertheless the right exists.

Quote:
Originally Posted by AmericanDreamer";p=&quot View Post
It is a seperate entity, a unique individual with the will to live. I have no right to kill it simply because it is inconvenient or unwanted.
A fetus may be an individual, but not even you treat it as one. You clearly declare that a fetus has the "will to live," but if the fetus were an individual shouldn't you let it decide its own will?

If you come up with an arguement that makes sense I may read your poem.
Im glad you cling to your "rights" as defined by the law of the land but there is also a higher law of conscience that you seem intent on ignoring- murder is murder- whether or not a government entity says it is "ok"
How can you say that I am "deciding will of the fetus" by letting it live? Do you mean it wishes to die? How do you know and doesnt this line of thinking mean that you are deciding the will of the fetus? (*ahem* baby- it is "ok" to call it a baby i.e. human being/child)
How about you come up with an argument that makes sense yourself and it is not *my* poem- but Im sure that things other than what you choose to hide behind dont concern you
Reply With Quote
  #9 (permalink)  
Old 09-26-2005, 08:00 PM
JavaBlack's Avatar
JavaBlack JavaBlack is online now
Site Moderator
Guru
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Michigan
Age: 29
Posts: 14,022
usa us michigan
JavaBlack has a brilliant futureJavaBlack has a brilliant futureJavaBlack has a brilliant futureJavaBlack has a brilliant futureJavaBlack has a brilliant futureJavaBlack has a brilliant futureJavaBlack has a brilliant futureJavaBlack has a brilliant futureJavaBlack has a brilliant futureJavaBlack has a brilliant futureJavaBlack has a brilliant future
Credits: 93,825
Default When all else fails...

Individual decision must prevail. There can not be an agreement on whether a fetus is a living being or not. It is all in how we define it. Many harsh words are spread between the lines on this issue, and niether side really tries to understand the other- or maybe they just can't.
I personally think that abortion should not be a guiltless endeavor, because that could desensitize and create a cold society. But it rarely is a guiltless endeavor. And because we cannot come to any agreement, we must leave it to the choice of the individual. Someone who does not view a fetus as living cannot understand it as murder. Someone who sees the fetus as a living being cannot understand how it cannot be seen as murder. I simply see it as a sad choice for someone to make, but their choice nonetheless.
Reply With Quote
  #10 (permalink)  
Old 09-27-2005, 07:04 AM
Hansmoleman's Avatar
Hansmoleman Hansmoleman is offline
Guru
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Boston, Massachusetts
Posts: 3,281
Hansmoleman is on a distinguished road
Credits: 19,043
Default The question is..

When does life start and end? Is someone dead when their heart stops working? Does it start when it starts to work? If so, fetuses ARE alive. Does life start when a being can feel pain? Then a fetus is alive. thus, killing a fetus is nothing short of murder.
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are Off
Forum Jump

Sponsored Links

All times are GMT -8. The time now is 10:55 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.7.1
Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
LinkBacks Enabled by vBSEO 3.1.0
Template-Modifikationen durch TMS
vBCredits v1.3 ©2007 by Darkwaltz4
Advertisement System V2.1 By   Branden