Page 1 of 3 123 LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 23

Thread: Free Energy Suppression - True or False

  1. Default Free Energy Suppression - True or False

    The fossil fuel industry has been known to buy out inventions or patents that that threaten their industry usually paying out big bickies to the inventors.

    So going on that theory, will they allow clean energy to be developed to apoint where fosil fuels becomes redundant.

    You know carbon tax, AGW and clean energy that kind of stuff.

    Will they allow their $2 trillion + /annum industry to go down the gurgler just like that?

    Especially to some form of energy where a meter just can't be attached to it?

    THOUGHTS?

    Car engines that run on water?
    http://www.spiritofmaat.com/archive/feb2/bird.htm
    Last edited by dumbanddumber; Jan 06 2012 at 05:27 PM.
    There has never been a more serious assault on our standard of living than the carbon tax. dumbanddumber

    "The cost, paid by big polluters, will be passed through to the prices of the goods you buy." Julia Gillard

    "Australian households will ultimately bear the full cost of the carbon price." Ross Garnaut

    "A carbon tax does not guarantee emissions reductions" Former Labor Climate Change Minister Penny Wong


  2. Default

    I am posting as a postulation for an idea for an engine. I make NO CLAIMS that it works. But in theory it looks like it could work.
    Here's an image of what the engine would look like:

    http://i6.photobucket.com/albu...linkzelda/Image2.jpg

    The premise behind the engine is that the green pieces in the picture are clamps that hold specific types of magnets with the poles being at the long end of the magnets.

    A movie of how the engine works based off an earlier version can be found here:

    [ame="http://www.dailymotion.com/video/xkpyya_final-version-xvid_tech"]Final Version_xvid - Video Dailymotion[/ame]

    The magnetic pressure comparisons between

  3. Default

    Quote Originally Posted by dumbanddumber View Post
    The fossil fuel industry has been known to buy out inventions or patents that that threaten their industry usually paying out big bickies to the inventors.

    So going on that theory, will they allow clean energy to be developed to apoint where fosil fuels becomes redundant.

    You know carbon tax, AGW and clean energy that kind of stuff.

    Will they allow their $2 trillion + /annum industry to go down the gurgler just like that?

    Especially to some form of energy where a meter just can't be attached to it?

    THOUGHTS?

    Car engines that run on water?
    http://www.spiritofmaat.com/archive/feb2/bird.htm
    When we consider that the fossil fuel industry, as an institution, which it effectively is, has been the most powerfull entity in the history of mankind, we can expect no tolerance of competition from it. The fossil fuel industry, although segmented, can in this instance be viewed as a single entity. No carbon tax will ever effect the fossil fuel industry, it deals in real wealth, in exchange for it`s products, and has no qualms over who steals money from who. A carbon tax is nothing but a money transfer, allowed by hysteria, it has nothing to do with environmental issues.
    Last edited by aussiefree2ride; Mar 24 2012 at 02:30 PM.

  4. Default

    Quote Originally Posted by aussiefree2ride View Post
    When we consider that the fossil fuel industry, as an institution, which it effectively is, has been the most powerfull entity in the history of mankind, we can expect no tolerance of competition from it. The fossil fuel industry, although segmented, can in this instance be viewed as a single entity. No carbon tax will ever effect the fossil fuel industry, it deals in real wealth, in exchange for it`s products, and has no qualms over who steals money from who. A carbon tax is nothing but a money transfer, allowed by hysteria, it has nothing to do with environmental issues.
    agreed, i dont think the exxon'ss and the shell's will allow green energy to flourish it just aint gonna happen imo.
    There has never been a more serious assault on our standard of living than the carbon tax. dumbanddumber

    "The cost, paid by big polluters, will be passed through to the prices of the goods you buy." Julia Gillard

    "Australian households will ultimately bear the full cost of the carbon price." Ross Garnaut

    "A carbon tax does not guarantee emissions reductions" Former Labor Climate Change Minister Penny Wong

  5. Default

    Quote Originally Posted by dumbanddumber View Post
    agreed, i dont think the exxon'ss and the shell's will allow green energy to flourish it just aint gonna happen imo.
    Meanwhile, the simple sheeple tilt at windmills, and the swifties reap the rewards.

  6. #6
    australia au victoria
    Location: Somewhere in the vicinity of Betelgeuse
    Posts: 2,389

    Default

    Oh right, so the mining companies have mounted this huge hundreds of millions of dollars media campaign against the ETS and the MRRT, and are mounting a hugely expensive high court challenge against the MRRT, because it will "have no effect on them".

    Where as... "Direct Action", PAYING these guys directly, is going to get them to lower emissions. Yup... that makes sense.

    Greens are the only party that want to shut down the coal industry, obviously you should be voting for them.

  7. #7

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by dumbanddumber View Post
    The fossil fuel industry has been known to buy out inventions or patents that that threaten their industry usually paying out big bickies to the inventors.

    So going on that theory, will they allow clean energy to be developed to apoint where fosil fuels becomes redundant.

    You know carbon tax, AGW and clean energy that kind of stuff.

    Will they allow their $2 trillion + /annum industry to go down the gurgler just like that?

    Especially to some form of energy where a meter just can't be attached to it?

    THOUGHTS?

    Car engines that run on water?
    http://www.spiritofmaat.com/archive/feb2/bird.htm
    stop and think about it. if an automaker could get it's hands on something that would make their cars cheaper to run than their competition's cars, they'd kill for it, not buy it and shelf it.
    What you have whispered to someone behind closed doors will be shouted from the rooftops.
    I don't want to set the world on fire-just parts of it.

  8. Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Ziggy Stardust View Post
    Oh right, so the mining companies have mounted this huge hundreds of millions of dollars media campaign against the ETS and the MRRT, and are mounting a hugely expensive high court challenge against the MRRT, because it will "have no effect on them".

    Where as... "Direct Action", PAYING these guys directly, is going to get them to lower emissions. Yup... that makes sense.

    Greens are the only party that want to shut down the coal industry, obviously you should be voting for them.
    Hey Ziggy

    You think oil/gas and mining are going to idly standby so green energy can bankrupt them.

    You silly boy!

    Unless ofcourse its business as usually and a new ponzy scheme on the market called carbon crdits.
    There has never been a more serious assault on our standard of living than the carbon tax. dumbanddumber

    "The cost, paid by big polluters, will be passed through to the prices of the goods you buy." Julia Gillard

    "Australian households will ultimately bear the full cost of the carbon price." Ross Garnaut

    "A carbon tax does not guarantee emissions reductions" Former Labor Climate Change Minister Penny Wong

  9. Default

    Quote Originally Posted by mikezila View Post
    stop and think about it. if an automaker could get it's hands on something that would make their cars cheaper to run than their competition's cars, they'd kill for it, not buy it and shelf it.
    Was it exxon that gave GMH billions of dollars to buy out the first manufactured elecric car company which had about 400 models ready to go on the US market.

    They bought them out took the patent and sent the 400 electric cars to scrap metal yards.

    Oh yeah guess what GMH no has its own electric cars.
    There has never been a more serious assault on our standard of living than the carbon tax. dumbanddumber

    "The cost, paid by big polluters, will be passed through to the prices of the goods you buy." Julia Gillard

    "Australian households will ultimately bear the full cost of the carbon price." Ross Garnaut

    "A carbon tax does not guarantee emissions reductions" Former Labor Climate Change Minister Penny Wong

  10. Default

    Quote Originally Posted by dumbanddumber View Post
    Was it exxon that gave GMH billions of dollars to buy out the first manufactured elecric car company which had about 400 models ready to go on the US market.

    They bought them out took the patent and sent the 400 electric cars to scrap metal yards.

    Oh yeah guess what GMH no has its own electric cars.
    who is GMH?
    What you have whispered to someone behind closed doors will be shouted from the rooftops.
    I don't want to set the world on fire-just parts of it.

Page 1 of 3 123 LastLast

Tags for this Thread

Bookmarks

Bookmarks