Thread: Comparing the Parties

Originally Posted by truthvigilante

The source is still from costello. Politicians constantly paint a picture that is far from the truth. Costello's article is the only place i've seen this information, now this is not an evidence fact, it's from a personal bias. In any instance 6 billion is a far cry from 72 billion. Basically, your article cannot be considered fact.

So show us where you got your figure of $72 billion. Show us some evidence which says the figures given by Peter Costello are not right.

Originally Posted by Adultmale

So show us where you got your figure of $72 billion. Show us some evidence which says the figures given by Peter Costello are not right.

This may help you out. I think you will find a number of independant sources that suggest the same information.

http://australianpropertyforum.com/topic/9625940/1/

Originally Posted by truthvigilante

This may help you out. I think you will find a number of independant sources that suggest the same information.

http://australianpropertyforum.com/topic/9625940/1/

Dear me, you're not very good at this are you vegie. Try a google advanced search with the words - Hawke Keating asset sales - then try again with Howard Costello asset sales. The federal treasurey site has plenty of info too.

Originally Posted by Adultmale

Dear me, you're not very good at this are you vegie. Try a google advanced search with the words - Hawke Keating asset sales - then try again with Howard Costello asset sales. The federal treasurey site has plenty of info too.

Been done malena, I mean you can't get too much clearer than this can ya. It is a independant source. I think it gives a clear insight. Good luck with continuing to find info to support your claim! Happy to check out other info you have that comes from an unbiased source.

Originally Posted by truthvigilante

Been done malena, I mean you can't get too much clearer than this can ya. It is a independant source. I think it gives a clear insight. Good luck with continuing to find info to support your claim! Happy to check out other info you have that comes from an unbiased source.

AHHAHaAhAhh!!! an independant and unbiased source! ahahahhhaah!! You're telling us a blog on forum (and actually it is a blog quoted from another pro Labor forum), is unbiased??? how do you know it is unbiased? who wrote the blog? and you appear to be claiming this blog from an unkown person is more authoritive than the federal treasurey web site and a speech from the treasurer of the government of the day! and even your unkown blogger has 'adjusted' get that vegie, 'adjusted' the figure for the coalition. If we do the same adjustment to Labors $6 billion it turns into over $9 billion!

Originally Posted by Adultmale

AHHAHaAhAhh!!! an independant and unbiased source! ahahahhhaah!! You're telling us a blog on forum (and actually it is a blog quoted from another pro Labor forum), is unbiased??? how do you know it is unbiased? who wrote the blog? and you appear to be claiming this blog from an unkown person is more authoritive than the federal treasurey web site and a speech from the treasurer of the government of the day! and even your unkown blogger has 'adjusted' get that vegie, 'adjusted' the figure for the coalition. If we do the same adjustment to Labors $6 billion it turns into over $9 billion!

http://www.marketeconomics.com.au/20...bt-elimination

http://debtreliefmag.com/more-facts-...t-elimination/

Originally Posted by truthvigilante

http://www.marketeconomics.com.au/20...bt-elimination

http://debtreliefmag.com/more-facts-...t-elimination/

Howard could have done much more than sell tens of billions of dollars of assets and sit on his hands and do nothing but bluff his economic credentials. He had the mining boom and no GFC impacts to deal with. Hawke and keating brought Australia through a rough period that Howard rode on the back of. The economy was on the way up due to the ideals of the labor party and their comprehensive approach to the economy prior to Howard. The labor government brought Australia through another very ugly period "after" the reign of Fraser and Howard of which inflation was extremely high and interest rates were at 21%. How much more evidence do you really need to make sense of the differences.

Originally Posted by truthvigilante

http://www.marketeconomics.com.au/20...bt-elimination

http://debtreliefmag.com/more-facts-...t-elimination/

AHHHAHHHAHAHAH!!! Market economics is run by a bloke who is adviser to the prime minister, really unbiased, sure!! He is a Labor stoogie! and the second link is just quoting the first! AHHAHAHAHAH!!! and even they are admitting that Labor was UNABLE IN 13 YEARS TO REPAY ONE CENT of the debt they inherited, they just added to it.

Originally Posted by Adultmale

AHHHAHHHAHAHAH!!! Market economics is run by a bloke who is adviser to the prime minister, really unbiased, sure!! He is a Labor stoogie! and the second link is just quoting the first! AHHAHAHAHAH!!! and even they are admitting that Labor was UNABLE IN 13 YEARS TO REPAY ONE CENT of the debt they inherited, they just added to it.

Malena, I'm not sure whether you are being reflective or not......actually its rudely obvious..lol. The realities are as is stated in post #77. Anyway, it is up to you how you want to convince yourself without collective factors. The coalition government would have sent us down the gurgler with every other conservative government that ruled during the GFC. There are many obvious points that suggest you live in a fairytale conservative wonderland dude, and need a neck massage to allow to see all of your surrounds. Don't believe the spin, the proof is in the pudding, and the world over regarding conservative dog eat dog, open slather policies! The Howard government had the best run of all governments but did absolutely zip for the future of our nation. They lived for the here and now like every other conservative government the world over and the reason the world is in the sh1t!

Originally Posted by truthvigilante

Malena, I'm not sure whether you are being reflective or not......actually its rudely obvious..lol. The realities are as is stated in post #77. Anyway, it is up to you how you want to convince yourself without collective factors. The coalition government would have sent us down the gurgler with every other conservative government that ruled during the GFC. There are many obvious points that suggest you live in a fairytale conservative wonderland dude, and need a neck massage to allow to see all of your surrounds. Don't believe the spin, the proof is in the pudding, and the world over regarding conservative dog eat dog, open slather policies! The Howard government had the best run of all governments but did absolutely zip for the future of our nation. They lived for the here and now like every other conservative government the world over and the reason the world is in the sh1t!

Dream on buddy.