View RSS Feed

MacGyverisms

The Religious Argument Against SSM Is A Failure

Rating: 3 votes, 2.33 average.
Whenever the issue of gay marriage comes up, one of the most common argument against it is the religious argument.

The argument goes something like this: Since God is the Creator of marriage, only God can decide who is to be marred or not. As the Bible condemns homosexuality, it is clear that marriage can be between one man, and one woman only.

The problem is this: People who use this argument must prove that God exists before their argument can become valid.

If you are arguing that God created marriage, you need to provide facts to back that claim up - and that doesn't mean the Bible. It means that you must prove that God exists, in order to prove that God created marriage, which is your argument. If you cannot prove the existence of God, your argument is invalid and must be dismissed.

In my opinion, there can be no religious argument in opposition to same sex marriage as God plays a central part to that argument. And as I have said, without proof of the existence of God, there can be no valid argument.

Submit "The Religious Argument Against SSM Is A Failure" to Digg Submit "The Religious Argument Against SSM Is A Failure" to del.icio.us Submit "The Religious Argument Against SSM Is A Failure" to StumbleUpon Submit "The Religious Argument Against SSM Is A Failure" to Google Submit "The Religious Argument Against SSM Is A Failure" to Yahoo Submit "The Religious Argument Against SSM Is A Failure" to Furl Submit "The Religious Argument Against SSM Is A Failure" to Reddit

Categories
Uncategorized

Comments

  1. Huh!!! Guess What IDGAD!'s Avatar
    You really want proof of Gods exsistance? U_U look around you please. Yea do a complete 360 an ask yourself is this all an accident. Cuz if you say yes everything around you is an accident then that means... your an accident. But if you say no its not an accident that means everything you see came into be by a higher power.
  2. Makedde's Avatar
    That is not proof of God. I could say the exact same thing and insist that it proves the existence of the flying spaghetti monster.