My position is that we should go to anarcho-capitalism WITH THE EXCEPTION of:
1. Regulation on land use to make it so that land is both affordable to almost everyone, and
2. We might perhaps need a miniarchist domestic law enforcement, and
3. We need to sometimes fund education/training so that someone that has both no money and little marketable skill can feasably obtain a marketable skill/knowledge.
I don't even believe in publicly funding the military.
Last edited by DeathStar; Mar 10 2012 at 01:58 AM.
Making it harder to acquire large amounts of land, but easier to obtain a small amount of land so that almost everyone can have a place to live without going homeless, will do the opposite. Freeing resources and money from Big Land Rent will allow said money to be pumped back into the rest of the economy and fuel it to grow.
The only question now is, how to we go about "making it harder to acquire large amounts of land, but easier to obtain a small amount of land so that almost everyone can have a place to live"?
Last edited by Reiver; Mar 10 2012 at 02:16 AM.
Anyways. Why don't I give you MY ideas on why my idea of geoism would work better than either Marxism or right-wing-style capitalism or Keynesianism (which is really a sort of socialistic capitalism hybrid)?