Thread: How to Defeat a Liberal in a Debate

Originally Posted by Reiver

It isn't a question. I asked for an empirical study and you gave something just a little better than your blog.

Whether or not I am wasting your time is not a matter of debate. Any real economist would know that. You know why? Because you're the only one that can truly know whether something is a waste of your time. You know why? Because all our utility functions are different.

What IS a matter of debate is whether you believe that congress is better than you are at determining the best use of your limited time. That's the question that you have strenuously avoided answering. Did congress decide it was the best use of your limited time to spend countless hours producing 20,000 posts in this forum?

Originally Posted by Xerographica

Any real economist would know that.

A reference to the original requirement that sourced real economist would be great. I find your non-economic approach most disagreeable

Originally Posted by Reiver

A reference to the original requirement that sourced real economist would be great. I find your non-economic approach most disagreeable

Oh man! Look at you STRAIN to avoid the question. Did you, or did you not, ask congress whether it was the best use of your limited time to spend countless hours producing 20,000 posts in this forum?

I'm not interested in the humph. See my original request and try and achieve it