Political Forum
     

Go Back   Political Forum > Political Issues > Other Political Issues > Campaign & Political Reform


Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1 (permalink)  
Old 04-13-2004, 08:35 PM
greg greg is offline
Observer
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Posts: 48
greg is on a distinguished road
Credits: 469
Send a message via AIM to greg
Default Art of positive campaigning

I wrote this up earlier today, don't mean to spam but it is way too long to post. Covers the basic negative campaign stances of 2004 and why negative campaigns are bad. Tried to be as fair and balanced as my liberal mindset would allow.

http://www.commonamerica.org/negativecampaigns04.html
Reply With Quote
Sponsored Links
Red Cross - Donate Today    Save the Rainforest
  #2 (permalink)  
Old 04-21-2004, 12:21 AM
Ozek Ozek is offline
Correspondent
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Posts: 381
usa us texas
Ozek has a spectacular aura aboutOzek has a spectacular aura about
Credits: 3,866
Default nicely done

I enjoyed your article. I think that the candidates try to define their opposition so that the opposition is always playing defense. It's just the strategy of politics these days, to hammer away with negative stuff.

I think that Kerry has wavered in his votes more that most. For example, in 1991 he was one of only 8 senators who voted *against* helping Kuwait, after they were already attacked, people had died, and their capital city was on fire. And Kuwait was considered an ally at the time. So our ally is attacked, and you vote to do nothing, when we are in dire need of a strong ally in the region?

Yet in this war, he voted for it, though no damage had been done by Saddam. Nothing was proven, and there were just a lot of hints that he had WMDs and was actually going to do something with them. And today, of course, he is against the war. His logic in these instances seems highly flawed to me, and in my view it is because he looks at the polls and follows them closely, rather than deciding to do what he thinks is right and just doing it.

Bush has no similar voting record. And if he did it would be full of wavering too no doubt, but I doubt it would change as often as Kerry's.

And no, I'm not pro-Bush or voting for either of these 2 guys, so don't get that assumption. I just think that Kerry wavering is a legitimate issue and I forsee the Republicans hammering it into everyones head whenever they get the chance.
Reply With Quote
  #3 (permalink)  
Old 06-04-2004, 06:44 PM
nzbm nzbm is offline
Observer
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: New Zealand
Posts: 35
nzbm is on a distinguished road
Credits: 320
Default ...

Maybe some New Zealand politicians could read this.
It applies to the majority of them.
__________________
http://www.brennanmcdonald.com
"Avoid shame - but do not seek glory - nothing as expensive as glory"
Sydney Smith (1771-1845)
Reply With Quote
  #4 (permalink)  
Old 08-09-2004, 01:56 AM
Demosthenes Demosthenes is offline
Commentator
 
Join Date: May 2004
Posts: 1,515
Demosthenes is on a distinguished road
Credits: 7,574
Default ....

Well it's now August 2004 and the idea of positive politics is out the window. Gee, it was nice for the 2 months that it lasted.

-Demosthenes
__________________
"A people that values its privileges above its principles soon loses both."
- Dwight D. Eisenhower
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are Off
Forum Jump

Sponsored Links

All times are GMT -8. The time now is 08:36 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.7.1
Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
LinkBacks Enabled by vBSEO 3.1.0
Template-Modifikationen durch TMS
vBCredits v1.3 ©2007 by Darkwaltz4
Advertisement System V2.1 By   Branden