![]() |
|
|
|||
|
I understand that this topic probably won't bring up as much conservancy as say abortion, but for people under the age of 18 you will be fined(after the first offense) for not wearing a helmet on a bike. I don't me motorcycle.
This is a blatant attack of freedom. If a child not wearing a helmet gets injured than its his/her fault, by not wearing a helmet kids aren't physically harming others. Yet the parents have to pay fines because we aren't doing as requested by the government. Also, children under the age of 16 aren't allowed to ride their bikes in the street (you know, the bike lane). So they could get hurt, when will we start asking children to make their own decisions?! |
| Sponsored Links |
| Red Cross - Donate Today Save the Rainforest |
|
||||
|
"This is a blatant attack of freedom.
...I guess having to wear a seatbelt in a car is also an attack on freedom? "If a child not wearing a helmet gets injured than its his/her fault, by not wearing a helmet kids aren't physically harming others." So if I run your kid over with my car I shouldn't have to pay the hospital bills right? "Also, children under the age of 16 aren't allowed to ride their bikes in the street (you know, the bike lane)." What?! I was riding my bike in the street since I was 5.
__________________
Walk down the right back alley in Sin City and you can find anything... Show your kids you love them by buying them the No. 7 brand. |
|
|||
|
Wear an approved helmet regardless of if the law try to enforce their use or not, it can save your life. Second, to treat bicycles "as cars" legally is stupid. Bicycles are something in between cars and pedestrians where I live and there are lot's of special bicycle roads that cars cannot use. Only bicycles and pedastrians may use them.
__________________
Whoever fights monsters should see to it that in the process he doesn't become a monster. Friedrich Nietzsche |
|
|||
|
That is debatable. People under the age of 18 are not considered by society to have inherited all legal rights yet. That makes sense even though it might be frustrating. People under the age of 18 are guaranteed their human rights (as in the Constitution's Bill of Rights) but other legal issues vary. This is why people under the age of 21 are not technically allowed to drink. Drinking is not a human right and neither is riding your bike with no helmet. You have the right to freedom of speech, religion, and trial by jury. But the law isn't black and white. It recognizes age and the need for allowances and differences.
__________________
lambaste me not |
|
|||
|
kids chioce! if the kids smart he'll wear one if he's/she's not ...survival of the fittest (and smartest)I suppose.
__________________
kings will tremble with my coming travelers feel my presence before it is seen powers crumble before me fear me for i am coming |
|
||||
|
Quote:
Two completely different arguments. It is your responsibility because the pedestrian (assumedly) had the right of way. You hitting a biker w/o a helmet has no bearing whatsoever for a violation of liberty on the bikers part. |
|
||||
|
So your willing to be a dumbass and not wear your seatbelt because it's an 'attack on your freedoms'?
A biker =/= a pedestrian. If some retard biker plows into my car and cracks his head open because he didn't have a helmet, not only am I not paying for his hospital bills, but I want compensation for the paint job. Darken
__________________
Walk down the right back alley in Sin City and you can find anything... Show your kids you love them by buying them the No. 7 brand. |
![]() |
| Bookmarks |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
| Sponsored Links |
|