Political Forum
     

Go Back   Political Forum > Political Issues > Civil Rights > Civil Liberties


Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1 (permalink)  
Old 06-16-2008, 07:20 PM
WafflesFTW WafflesFTW is offline
Correspondent
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: NJ, USA
Posts: 233
us new jersey
WafflesFTW will become famous soon enough
Credits: 1,166
Default Instead of a voting age limit there should be....

An intelligence test. I'm sick and tired of idiot, religious nutjobs who do not even know what conservatives are voting in sub-100 IQ people for bonus points in their afterlife. Honestly, conservatives are about reducing spending, and they finance the biggest disaster in the past 50 years with costs around 2$ billion a week.

http://www.boston.com/news/world/mid...rly_2b_a_week/

The purpose of the age restriction, after all, is to make sure the ignorant, impressionable and uninformed won't be misled by the mass media. It's happening anyway, so why not abolish that and make sure all voters pass an "anti-bull(*)(*)(*)(*)" test or an "intelligence" test.
Reply With Quote
Sponsored Links
Red Cross - Donate Today    Save the Rainforest
  #2 (permalink)  
Old 06-16-2008, 07:30 PM
SuperDinoYoshi's Avatar
SuperDinoYoshi SuperDinoYoshi is offline
Sr. Correspondent
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Posts: 749
usa us florida
SuperDinoYoshi is just really niceSuperDinoYoshi is just really niceSuperDinoYoshi is just really niceSuperDinoYoshi is just really nice
Credits: 5,869
Send a message via AIM to SuperDinoYoshi
Default

Sorry, I'd rather not have my government decide who isn't intelligent enough to vote.
Reply With Quote
  #3 (permalink)  
Old 06-16-2008, 07:42 PM
MasTequila's Avatar
MasTequila MasTequila is offline
Guru
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Illinois
Posts: 3,326
usa us illinois
MasTequila has a reputation beyond reputeMasTequila has a reputation beyond reputeMasTequila has a reputation beyond reputeMasTequila has a reputation beyond reputeMasTequila has a reputation beyond reputeMasTequila has a reputation beyond reputeMasTequila has a reputation beyond reputeMasTequila has a reputation beyond reputeMasTequila has a reputation beyond reputeMasTequila has a reputation beyond reputeMasTequila has a reputation beyond repute
Credits: 32,387
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by WafflesFTW View Post
An intelligence test. I'm sick and tired of idiot, religious nutjobs who do not even know what conservatives are voting in sub-100 IQ people for bonus points in their afterlife. Honestly, conservatives are about reducing spending, and they finance the biggest disaster in the past 50 years with costs around 2$ billion a week.

http://www.boston.com/news/world/mid...rly_2b_a_week/

The purpose of the age restriction, after all, is to make sure the ignorant, impressionable and uninformed won't be misled by the mass media. It's happening anyway, so why not abolish that and make sure all voters pass an "anti-bull(*)(*)(*)(*)" test or an "intelligence" test.
I will pray for your lost soul. That post was as close a thing to an ignorant rant as I have seen in quite awhile.
__________________
Barack Obama 144 lies and counting.

Liberals believe it is okay to kill babies, but not terrorists.

democrats believe it is okay to taser a 10 year old if this stance will get their guy elected.
Reply With Quote
  #4 (permalink)  
Old 06-16-2008, 08:26 PM
White Fox's Avatar
White Fox White Fox is offline
Guru
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: 札幌市
Posts: 7,002
singapore de hesse
White Fox has a reputation beyond reputeWhite Fox has a reputation beyond reputeWhite Fox has a reputation beyond reputeWhite Fox has a reputation beyond reputeWhite Fox has a reputation beyond reputeWhite Fox has a reputation beyond reputeWhite Fox has a reputation beyond reputeWhite Fox has a reputation beyond reputeWhite Fox has a reputation beyond reputeWhite Fox has a reputation beyond reputeWhite Fox has a reputation beyond repute
Credits: 35,974
Default

AAAAANNNNNNDDDDDDD, NO, you DON'T pass the test
__________________
.
"It is extremely difficult for our contemporaries to conceive of the conditions of free banking because they take government interference with banking for granted and as necessary"

-- Ludwig von Mises


Reply With Quote
  #5 (permalink)  
Old 06-16-2008, 08:33 PM
Lackluster's Avatar
Lackluster Lackluster is online now
Analyst
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: oregon
Posts: 2,164
usa us oregon
Lackluster has a reputation beyond reputeLackluster has a reputation beyond reputeLackluster has a reputation beyond reputeLackluster has a reputation beyond reputeLackluster has a reputation beyond reputeLackluster has a reputation beyond reputeLackluster has a reputation beyond reputeLackluster has a reputation beyond reputeLackluster has a reputation beyond reputeLackluster has a reputation beyond reputeLackluster has a reputation beyond repute
Credits: 10,010
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by WafflesFTW View Post
I'm sick and tired of idiot, religious nutjobs who do not even know what conservatives are voting in sub-100 IQ people for bonus points in their afterlife. .
I have read this sentence several times, and am having a terrible time trying to decipher it.

I guess that makes me one of the dummies.
__________________
I've had a perfectly wonderful evening......... but this wasn't it. -- Marx

Last edited by Lackluster; 06-16-2008 at 08:33 PM.
Reply With Quote
  #6 (permalink)  
Old 06-18-2008, 05:44 AM
Giorgio's Avatar
Giorgio Giorgio is offline
Correspondent
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: London, UK
Age: 21
Posts: 215
italy
Giorgio is just really niceGiorgio is just really niceGiorgio is just really niceGiorgio is just really nice
Credits: 2,408
Default

not very well put, but I totally agree with the principle. You should have to prove yourself able to make a responsible decision in order to be given the privilege of voting in an election. We're all members of society, yes, but it contributes nothing to the political process if someone is only voting democrat on the basis that they are working class, or vice versa.

I don'tthink it should be a straight up IQ test, or even a test of intelligence. But I am in favour of something like a 'driver's licence' approach, whereby you need to be able to demonstrate a degree of familiarity with the basic concepts of government, how your vote will be processed and how the party system works. This does not need to be partisan, and I fully believe that with the proper oversight, we can trust the government to be objective about it.

After all, the government takes away our freedom to drive until we prove ourselves able to do so responsibly because otherwise a lot of people would get hurt. The stakes are just as high when letting someone who has absolutely no idea how politics work vote.
__________________
it is a mistake to throw out the language of equal worth because of its contingent historical association with Western power.
Reply With Quote
  #7 (permalink)  
Old 06-18-2008, 06:12 AM
Lincoln1861's Avatar
Lincoln1861 Lincoln1861 is offline
Correspondent
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Pennsylvania
Posts: 195
usa us pennsylvania
Lincoln1861 will become famous soon enough
Credits: 1,076
Default

That is what the Democrats did in the South during Reconstruction to keep the blacks from voting. Among other things, they would make them pass an intelligence test that was based on interpretation of the Constitution and was set up to be too difficult for any black voter to pass.
Reply With Quote
  #8 (permalink)  
Old 06-18-2008, 06:21 AM
Lackluster's Avatar
Lackluster Lackluster is online now
Analyst
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: oregon
Posts: 2,164
usa us oregon
Lackluster has a reputation beyond reputeLackluster has a reputation beyond reputeLackluster has a reputation beyond reputeLackluster has a reputation beyond reputeLackluster has a reputation beyond reputeLackluster has a reputation beyond reputeLackluster has a reputation beyond reputeLackluster has a reputation beyond reputeLackluster has a reputation beyond reputeLackluster has a reputation beyond reputeLackluster has a reputation beyond repute
Credits: 10,010
Default

Why stop at just voting?

What we need are breeding licenses. What I suggest is that we only allow people to vote who have a coefficient of 1 or greater when I.Q is plotted against weights. I/E -- if we have an I.Q. of 170 and a weight of 160, then we get to breed. if it's 100 over 230, no luck buster.

Let's face it, we are stupid and we are fat, so what better way to address the problem?

Oh, and btw -- my own time to breed has passed. Too many dorritos......
__________________
I've had a perfectly wonderful evening......... but this wasn't it. -- Marx

Last edited by Lackluster; 06-18-2008 at 06:21 AM. Reason: thinking too much about breeding
Reply With Quote
  #9 (permalink)  
Old 06-18-2008, 06:54 AM
WafflesFTW WafflesFTW is offline
Correspondent
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: NJ, USA
Posts: 233
us new jersey
WafflesFTW will become famous soon enough
Credits: 1,166
Default

"I will pray for your lost soul. That post was as close a thing to an ignorant rant as I have seen in quite awhile."

I'm glad you are intelligent enough to provide discourse over the matter. [/sarcasm] Don't waste your time praying. Your invisible sky daddy doesn't exist. Then again, if you wish to talk to the air your entire life, I'm feeling sorry for YOU.

"Sorry, I'd rather not have my government decide who isn't intelligent enough to vote."

They are... with voting age restrictions. And if the test is standardized, then it isn't "deciding."

"That is what the Democrats did in the South during Reconstruction to keep the blacks from voting. Among other things, they would make them pass an intelligence test that was based on interpretation of the Constitution and was set up to be too difficult for any black voter to pass."

This isn't the same case. In that scenario the literacy tests were given ONLY to blacks. Whites were helped along, easier questions, etc. Otherwise, an eqivalent amount of white people would have failed them as well.

"AAAAANNNNNNDDDDDDD, NO, you DON'T pass the test"

Source?

"I have read this sentence several times, and am having a terrible time trying to decipher it.

I guess that makes me one of the dummies."

Yes.

"Why stop at just voting?

What we need are breeding licenses. What I suggest is that we only allow people to vote who have a coefficient of 1 or greater when I.Q is plotted against weights. I/E -- if we have an I.Q. of 170 and a weight of 160, then we get to breed. if it's 100 over 230, no luck buster.

Let's face it, we are stupid and we are fat, so what better way to address the problem?

Oh, and btw -- my own time to breed has passed. Too many dorritos......"

You do realize, in the case that occured, we would end up with a more intelligent, more in shape society. It would be artificial selection for the best in society. DARWINISM.
Reply With Quote
  #10 (permalink)  
Old 06-18-2008, 07:55 AM
JavaBlack's Avatar
JavaBlack JavaBlack is offline
Site Moderator
Guru
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Michigan
Age: 29
Posts: 16,289
usa us michigan
JavaBlack has a reputation beyond reputeJavaBlack has a reputation beyond reputeJavaBlack has a reputation beyond reputeJavaBlack has a reputation beyond reputeJavaBlack has a reputation beyond reputeJavaBlack has a reputation beyond reputeJavaBlack has a reputation beyond reputeJavaBlack has a reputation beyond reputeJavaBlack has a reputation beyond reputeJavaBlack has a reputation beyond reputeJavaBlack has a reputation beyond repute
Credits: 109,200
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by SuperDinoYoshi View Post
Sorry, I'd rather not have my government decide who isn't intelligent enough to vote.
Exactly.

Age may be a bit arbitrary, but at least it's the same for all.

Also I think it's ridiculous when people blame voting they don't like on stupidity. People largely vote on emotional stimulus more often than logic- regardless of IQ or knowledge.

And most really stupid people are also the people less likely to bother voting (though some will undoubtedly claim that choice shows great wisdom )
__________________
"Man lives in the sunlit world of that which he believes to be reality. But unseen by most is an underworld, a place that is just as real... but not as brightly lit... A DARK SIDE!"
-opening from Tales From the Darkside
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
AP To Limit Use Of Its Articles On Websites SweetnessBlog Political Blogs 0 06-16-2008 07:40 AM
Limit # of Posts 97240sx Forum Help, Feedback, Etc. 16 12-09-2007 10:53 PM
If the voting method was Instant Run-Off Voting Ozek Elections & Campaigns 1 10-25-2004 09:46 AM
Is there a limit to the length of a thread trot Forum Help, Feedback, Etc. 3 06-28-2004 01:55 AM
Is there a limit to thread size? Vote-Mickey-04 Forum Help, Feedback, Etc. 3 06-07-2004 10:34 AM

Sponsored Links

All times are GMT -8. The time now is 08:36 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.7.1
Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
LinkBacks Enabled by vBSEO 3.1.0
Template-Modifikationen durch TMS
vBCredits v1.3 ©2007 by Darkwaltz4
Advertisement System V2.1 By   Branden