Thread: Hawaii responds to Bennett's Obama birth records request

Hawaii responds to Bennett's Obama birth records request


PHOENIX -- The state of Hawaii has responded to Arizona Secretary of State Ken Bennett’s request for proof that President Barack Obama was in fact born in the Aloha State.
The Hawaii attorney general’s office has reportedly told Bennett that there are steps he needs to take in order to confirm President Obama’s birth records.
Those steps include Bennett proving that he legitimately needs confirmation in order to update the records at his office.
Bennett recently said in an interview with KFYI that he had asked Hawaii to further verify the President’s birth.
Bennett said he would consider removing President Obama’s name from the ballot during this year’s presidential election if Hawaii didn’t fulfill his request.
Bennett stated that he is not a “birther,” and believes that President Obama was born in the United States.
He went on to explain that he had received about 1,200 emails from Arizona voters who are concerned about President Obama’s birth records, and felt it was his duty to follow up.
President Obama released his birth certificate last year after some people questioned whether he was actually born in Hawaii.
Sheriff Joe Arpaio has been investigating the President’s birth certificate since last August. Arpaio has said that his investigation is still ongoing.

http://www.azfamily.com/news/Hawaii-...152213005.html

This should be interesting. I wonder, if HI will give the AZ Sec of state a copy of the original BC or its microfiche image? I wonder, if it would match what the WH released?


_

I'm still waiting for Photo's taken of the Grassy Knoll ... I think they are trying to hide something.

So Bennett isn't a Birther. Not so sure about that but he has a duty to make sure things are done right. It seems to me when the SOS requests proof of something in order for him to do his job correctly, HI should comply. HI is saying the request is not legitimate and that Bennett must provide proof of legitimacy for asking a question about the legitimacy of Obama's birth. This is insane.

Originally Posted by Lowden Clear

So Bennett isn't a Birther. Not so sure about that but he has a duty to make sure things are done right. It seems to me when the SOS requests proof of something in order for him to do his job correctly, HI should comply. HI is saying the request is not legitimate and that Bennett must provide proof of legitimacy for asking a question about the legitimacy of Obama's birth. This is insane.

Have you ever went down and got an offical birth certificate? Last time I did was to get a permit to carry. They asked me questions only I would know along with checking my ID's. This coming from a person who actually knew me. POINT IS They do not give out birth certificates to just anyone who walks through the door. They make sure you are the person who belongs to the BC. If you remember when Obama released it , It had to be picked up, They do not just send it through the mail when someone request one ,especially to someone other than the person who it belongs to. If AZ needs it to put Obama on the ballot, they should request it from him, not HI. He qualified to be on the ballot last time, so what has changed. How many times must a judge throw this nonsense out before people let it go. We have much bigger problems we need to be looking at than this. I agree, this is insane.

Originally Posted by Lowden Clear

So Bennett isn't a Birther. Not so sure about that but he has a duty to make sure things are done right. It seems to me when the SOS requests proof of something in order for him to do his job correctly, HI should comply. HI is saying the request is not legitimate and that Bennett must provide proof of legitimacy for asking a question about the legitimacy of Obama's birth. This is insane.

What is the big deal about providing a legitimate birth certificate and what does Barack Obama have to hide?

Most of the liberals in this group do not practice the art of common sense.

If he were indeed born in the USA, have the hospital provide a legitimate copy of his official birth certificate and we'll be done with all the questions! Let's also see the admission records that show his mother was actually in the hospital on the day Obama has born.

Can anyone on this Forum show me Willard Mitt Romney's Birth Certificate?

I don't see what the problem is. If the Hawaii DOH has already "verified" that proven fake birth certificate that obama showed last year, then they have undoubtedly replaced the original in their vault.
We can all agree at this point that obama is the biggest fraud ever perpetuated against the US and every step should be taken to remove him from office.

Arizona Secretary of State Ken Bennett is asking the wrong person. If he has any questions related to the eligibility of President Obama then he needs to ask Obama for a certified copy of his birth certificate. The Hawaii Dept of Health that issues these documents has no authority to release a certified copy of Obama's birth certificate to Mr Bennett.

This is no different than requesting a passport where a certified copy of one's birth certificate is submitted with the application for the passport. When the passport is issued then that certified copy is returned to the person. Of note President Obama's 2007 birth certificate (COLB), the original issued by the Hawaii Dept of Health, is all that needs to be submitted to Mr Bennett.

This is just another BS birther issue being propagated by a wacko nutcase.

Originally Posted by James Cessna

What is the big deal about providing a legitimate birth certificate and what does Barack Obama have to hide?

President Obama did present his legal birth certificate from Hawaii in 2007. That document has been physically reviewed by numerous independent sources to verify it's authenticity including FactCheck.org. Images of that document have been available online for years and the Hawaii Dept of Health which issued that document has verified all of the information on it.

"Birthers" are idiots and they don't even attempt to hide that fact.

I am not sure I understand why this Bennett fellow is doing this, other than the opportunity to get his name in the paper.

If the president and his campaign filled out the proper paperwork and provided the proper documentation to get the president onto the ballot in Arizona, then why go through this dog and pony show?

Certainly it is not the job of this civil servant to make some outrageous request unique to this president. Why is this fellow holding the president up to such higher standards?