![]() |
|
|
||||
|
If one cares to examine the record, one will see that former Ambassador Joseph Wilson has lied on more than one occassion. In fact, he lied to the Senate Select Committee on Intelligence for their Report on the U.S. Intelligence of Prewar Iraq:
Pages 43-44 of the Report: ".....When the former Ambassador spoke to Committee staff, his description of his findings differed from the DO Intelligence report and his account and his account of the information provided to him by the CIA differed from the CIA's officials accounts in some respects. First, the former Ambassador described his findings to Committee staff as more directly related to Iraq, and, specifically, both as refuting the possibility that Niger could have sold uranium to Iraq and that Iraq approached Niger to purchase uranium. The intelligence report described how the structure of Niger's uranium mines made it difficult, if not impossible, for Niger to sell uranium to any rogue states, but did not refute the possibility that Iraq had approached Niger to purchase uranium. Secondly, the former Ambassador said he discussed with his CIA contacts, which names and signature should have appeared on documentation of a legitimate uranium transaction. In fact, the intelligence report made no mention of the alleged Iraq/Niger uranium transaction or signatures that should have appeared on any documentation of such a deal. The only mention of Iraq in the report pertained to the meeting between the Iraqi delegation and former Prime Minister Mayaki. Third, the former Ambassador noted that his CIA contacts told him there were documents pertaining to the alleged Iraq-Niger uranium transaction and that the source of the information was the intelligence service. The DO Reports Officer told the Committee Staff that they did not provide the former Ambassador with any information about the source or details of the original reporting as it would have required sharing Classified information, and, noted that there were no "documents" circulating at the IC at the time of the former Ambassador's trip, only intelligence reports from intelligence regarding an alleged Iraq-Niger uranium deal. Meeting notes and other correspondence show that details of the reporting were discussed at the meeting of February 12, 2002, but none of the meeting participants recall telling the former Ambassador the source of the report. (U) The former ambassador also told Committee staff that he was the source of a Washington Post article ("CIA Did Not Share Doubt On Iraq Data: Bush Used Report of Uranium Bid," June 12, 2003) which said, "among the Envoy's conclusions was that the documents may have been forged because "the dates were wrong and the names were wrong." Committee staff asked how the former ambassador could have come to the conclousion that the "dates were wrong and the names were wrong" when he had never seen the CIA reports and had no knowledge of what names and dates were on the reports. The former ambassador said that he may have "misspoken" to the reporter when he said he concluded the documents were "forged." He also said he may have become confused about his own recollection after the International Atomic Energy Agency reported in March 2003 that the names and dates on the documents were not correct and may have thought he had seen the names himself. The former ambassador reitereated that he had been able to collect the names of the government officials which should have been on the documents." http://www.factcheck.org/UploadedFiles/US%20Report.pdf I urge all of you who haven't yet read it....to read the portion of this report pertaining to Joseph Wilson's testimony before the Committee. His account is full of lies, exaggerations and information that he could not have gotten any other way EXCEPT through his CIA wife who had access to the Classified information. IF Patrick Fitzgerald is worth anything, he should be looking into these lies and the possibility that Wilson by doing all this, actually "outed" his own wife. Not to mention, she may have broken laws and shared Classified info with hubby. And yet.....the silence on this in the media is defeaning.
__________________
"If the President simply adds a couple of Republican solutions to a trillion dollar health care package that the American people don't support, it isn't bi-partisan. It's political cover," Rep Eric Cantor (R-Va.) |
| Sponsored Links |
| Red Cross - Donate Today Save the Rainforest |
|
||||
|
Attack Wilson.
Attack the delay prosecutor. Attack attack attack. What is so stupid is that people actually fall for this stuff. Ummm. what about the fact the Niger documents proved forged. What about the fact about Delays funneling of money illegally. I notice how you are great at attacking the messenger, and totally ignoring the fact the messages are still true. Nice republican tatic. It is shame it works on most too. |
|
||||
|
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Try reading the Senate Select Committee Report. Try reading about Texas' law on corporate money....and/or CFR laws pertaining to the practice.
__________________
"If the President simply adds a couple of Republican solutions to a trillion dollar health care package that the American people don't support, it isn't bi-partisan. It's political cover," Rep Eric Cantor (R-Va.) |
|
||||
|
DeLay funnelling money illegally is a fact? Did I miss the trial or something?
__________________
Obama The Naive: To those who cling to power through corruption and deceit and the silencing of dissent we will extend a hand if you are willing to unclench your fist. The Iranian response? The Great Satan now has a black face. |
|
|||
|
"DeLay funnelling money illegally is a fact? Did I miss the trial or something?"
You forget, Rebellion, Texas Democrats don't have trials, they have Inquisitions. But even Inquisitors sometimes get hung. |
|
||||
|
Well, Tom Delay's lawyer is a Democrat from Texas too. And he thinks what Ronnie Earle is doing is absolutely disgusting and partisan as h-e-l-l.
__________________
"If the President simply adds a couple of Republican solutions to a trillion dollar health care package that the American people don't support, it isn't bi-partisan. It's political cover," Rep Eric Cantor (R-Va.) |
![]() |
| Bookmarks |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
| Sponsored Links |
|