Well, it's about time. The Washington Post has now started to write about the credibility....or lack thereof.....of Joseph Wilson and his motives.

Husband Is Conspicuous in Leak Case
Wilson's Credibility Debated as Charges In Probe Considered

Including the facts that Joseph Wilson has.....

1) taken advantage of his 15 minutes of fame by writing books, making a career of appearing on tv.....signed a movie deal....

2) Joined the Kerry staff

3) Told lies to newspapers about his trip (I've been telling ya that for weeks now)

4) Lied about who sent him

5) Lied about what he found there

6) Implied that he gave a negative report and swore than Cheney had seen it; but ignored it. In fact, his report supported the fact that Iraq had attempted to purchase uranium.

http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn...102401690.html

__________________
"This is a time for a national imperative not to fail in Iraq." Condoleeza Rice, January 11, 2007

That from the Post, guess I missed the article that referred to the NY Times liberal editorial page. Nope, no bias there folks! At least they finally put something about it in their paper, better late than never.[/i]

__________________
JMS gets another English lesson:

Quote:

there is no "mostly unique;" thats like saying "sometimes always," its an oxymoron - its either one or the other.

The result:

Quote:

By the mid-19th century unique had developed a wider meaning, “not typical, unusual,” and it is in this wider sense that it is compared. The comparison of so-called absolutes in senses that are not absolute is standard in all varieties of speech and writing.

JPT5 SAID THAT WILSON That does it for me!!!!! Wilson must be a liar, thief, dog and kitty killer, smoker, heavy drinker, and not a very nice man ............ why didn't you just tell us that earlier JP ??????

__________________
"I was born at night, but it was not last night night"

Well, I suppose it would matter NOT to you. But the fact that Joseph Wilson went to work for the Kerry campaign as a "foreign policy" adviser just a month before he (Wilson) was the "unanmed source" in 2 different articles lying and attacking the Bush administration, is pretty important to most people.

You may not care that Joseph Wilson lied in those articles.....by most of us do.

IF someone had attacked you in the newspapers.....telling lies about you.....would you NOT defend yourself? Would you NOT try to correct those lies and set the record straight? Or would you just simply let it go and not fight back?

__________________
"This is a time for a national imperative not to fail in Iraq." Condoleeza Rice, January 11, 2007

Of course you fight back, but you do it the right way. You don't send your henchman around to plant information in reporters. It's because of this underground messing around that they are possibly going to get into trouble.

Who cares about the leak, I want to see if someone does get hit up with perjury and/or obstruction of justice charges.

who sent him. It's no surprise that he was plotting to sabotage the Bush
Administration from the onset. This guy can cheat, lie and steal and gets away with it and yet Rove can't remember a certain conversation and may get indited. Until this episode is put in simple terms, there is no way the average American will understand it. But they will understand if Rove is indicted, even if it is frivolous. The right wing spin masters better find a way to simplify this for Mr.&Mrs. America. Wilson had intentions all along to prove the administration wrong.