![]() |
|
|
|||
|
Quote:
|
| Sponsored Links |
| Red Cross - Donate Today Save the Rainforest |
|
|||
|
Quote:
|
|
||||
|
First of all, Stekim I never said that if you opposed torture you were a lefty. I thought you were smarter than that. I guess that was my mistake.
For the rest of you holier than thou bleeding hearts: You're just telegraphing to the entire planet by stating, "Despite the fact that you cut of our heads for al Jazeerah, we're so much better than you just by not stooping to your level. Now don't you just feel bad? Your side is just a bunch of meanies!" They're under the impression that we're the weaker civilization. You're proving them correct. They like that. They're going to come on even stronger now. You're so blinded by showing good intentions you fail to remember the 3000 dead innocent lives in New York, and the videos of beheadings done to Americans in the name of allah. These people aren't impressed with your good intentions. Winningsmile and HD, you seem to act as if we are the only nation guilty of torture. If we take it off the table, we'll be the only ones NOT torturing. That's like punting on first down. It's stupid. I say it should be an option, just as nuclear weapons are an option. Obviously it's not the first one out of the bag, but hey... if they wonder about it, they'll hesitate. It's going into law. I don't like it, and I'm sure you'll rest easier knowing this. I certainly hope none of you have family members affected by the next attack. If and when that happens, I suspect you'll be the first clamoring for Bush's head because he didn't do anything to prevent it. Good for you. Congratulations, you get to blame Bush either way it turns out. You should be proud. By the way HD, spare us your self-righteous blather about how ashamed you are of the Right wing. What's disgraceful is the fact that even after we stop, you can rest assured our troops will continue to be tortured if they get captured. To believe that if we stop first then they will is sheer idiocy. They're going to continue torturing our soldiers no matter what we do. I'd like to point out that it's President McCain who is holding torture in reserve. In case you missed the hypocrisy, go read his bill. How is your reading comprehension? Don't you get it? He's drafting legislation that removes this hideous technique... (well except for just this one little instance as a last resort.) If it's wrong, it's wrong. If he genuinely believed in his great plan, then why the loophole? You're the ones who have trouble answering this question. I am not afraid nor am I ashamed at the United States fighting this war for keeps. I don't want to (*)(*)(*)(*)(*) foot around, I want to win. The longer this drags on, the more innocent lives are lost. The quicker we get intelligence, the quicker we can prosecute this war to a close. I want them crushed. I don't want to play nice. Your party is just interested in showing how flawed we are. When you confront evil with a rule book, innocent victims become the result. This is why Democrats can't be trusted with the National Security of our country.
__________________
"The heart of the wise inclines to the right, but the heart of the fool to the left." Ecclesiastes 10:2 (NIV) |
|
|||
|
Quote:
But I’ll give you another chance. Is it your firm belief that all nations have the right to commit torture as they deem fit? And remember they can also define what torture is according to they’re own personal outlook. You also mention that we should hold on to our option to utilize tactical nukes if needed. Great Idea. I guess that means Iran and Korea also possess the right to have a few tactical nukes handy just in case, or are we the only ones who can keep those around? So where’s my answer(s)? It’s amazing how every time you evade my question it blows up in your face. And you’ve got another problem pal. The administration was demanding actionable intelligence be obtained from prisoners in Gitmo, Afghanistan and Iraq. There is no stated policy by the administration that torture or the supposed aggressive interrogation techniques be held in reserve as an OPTION. That notion exists in your fantasy world. Do you really believe that McCain presented his Bill because only one or two torture sessions had occurred, and only as an option? Again, your fantasy world |
|
||||
|
Quote:
You do realize that in WWII a captured enemy soldier "in uniform representing a foreign state", say a nazi soldier, very well may be able to tell you plans that would save American lives. But governments agreed that torture could not be used, and I bet you don't even understand why? Afraid they will think we are the "weaker civilization".... Why the F do I care what a bunch of scumbag killers think. The weaker civilization is that one that lets hatred justify beheadings and torture. |
|
||||
|
Quote:
Believe me, I hope we catch Bin Laden, just like I hope the government catches any criminal who has done harm to its nation, but don't think that doing so will bring an end to terrorism or even win the war. The only war to win a war on terrorism, a war on violence, is to set a new example of how to solve problems without resorting to terrorism or violence. Otherwise, this won't just be our war. It be our children's war, and their children's war...
__________________
WARNING: In the unlikely event of an accidental agreement with any or all points made in the above post, contact a clinical psychologist immediately. The views expressed in the above post are not necessarily those of Joker and/or any of his affiliates. "You have found the secret message. Do you have too much time on your hands? ...Let it go." |
|
|||
|
why do we care so much about a foreigner getting tortured when some in our country cant afford proper health care. Plus, i've never seen an arab country express sorrow for decapitating any of our military personnel or their own people.
|
|
||||
|
...what benefits does it actually bring? It is one of, if not the, worst method for extracting information, in the Middle Ages it had women admitting to witchcraft.
And if someone is willing to kill themselves in order to take some civilians/soldiers with them, then the threat of torture if they are kidnapped wont really scare them will it? So all it will really do is produce unreliable intelligence and give extremists another recruiting tool. Not to mention being inhumane.
__________________
It's the difference between suicide and slow capitulation... - Jim Morrison |
![]() |
| Bookmarks |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
| Sponsored Links |
|