Obama Takes a Shot at the Birthers - Page 37

paco · #**361** (**permalink**) 02-09-2010, 09:00 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Divine Wind

Not meaningless, but links always help. Here's one for ya! http://www.cbsnews.com/blogs/2009/07...in;contentBody

A person so politically biased and ignorant of how our government works, that they think the American people are so stupid as to elect and install into the Oval Office a foreigner with complete access to every nuclear weapon in the US arsenal. They also think, but won't admit, that both former President Bush and former VP Cheney were totally negligent in allowing a foreigner to take office.

What do you think Paco? Should we shoot Bush for treason first or Cheney?

Does this look like President Bush is concerned about it?

Allowing a foreigner to take office after that foreigner had already been vetted by many of their colleagues is akin to allowing a gay person to be enlisted in the military. Admittance starts at the point of entry. Or in this case, (*)(*)(*)(*) rolls downhill. I don't see anything treasonous about negligence, because in cases of negligence, the law usually tends to go to the source of the problem. In this case, it wouldn't be Bush or Cheney. It would be whomever vetted Obama in, more than likely Hawaiian state officials.

Divine Wind · #**362** (**permalink**) 02-09-2010, 09:02 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by yguy

"A" riot?

Please. 95% of blacks voted for this guy. If you liked the Rodney King riots, you'd cream your jeans over what would have happened had Obama (pbuh) been disqualified.

Okay, several riots. So you are saying that the national security of our nation is worth less than the damage caused by riots? There were more riots and of larger scale during the 60's. At what point to you propose our nation's security is worthless than riots? What number would you sell out our country for on this matter?

Divine Wind · #**363** (**permalink**) 02-09-2010, 09:05 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by paco

Allowing a foreigner to take office after that foreigner had already been vetted by many of their colleagues is akin to allowing a gay person to be enlisted in the military. Admittance starts at the point of entry.

Wrong again. It's an on going process. I'm truly surprised by how many people on this forum have such low regard for the CIA, the FBI, the NSA and our military along with all other senior officials in our government.

keymanjim · #**364** (**permalink**) 02-09-2010, 09:08 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Divine Wind

Wrong again. It's an on going process. I'm truly surprised by how many people on this forum have such low regard for the CIA, the FBI, the NSA and our military along with all other senior officials in our government.

A lot of the reason he was allowed to take and hold office is the fundamental misunderstanding of the Constitution that has been inflicted on our population by the liberal education system.

Divine Wind · #**365** (**permalink**) 02-09-2010, 09:12 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by keymanjim

A lot of the reason he was allowed to take and hold office is the fundamental misunderstanding of the Constitution that has been inflicted on our population by the liberal education system.

Like I said, I'm amazed how many armchair experts on this forum have so little regard for our experts in all the intelligence agencies and the military.

yguy · #**366** (**permalink**) 02-09-2010, 09:15 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by toddwv

In this case, since the COLB is prima facie evidence and the state of Hawaii has confirmed that it is valid,

No, it hasn't.

Quote:

It's kind of like having the government dig up someone's back yard hoping to find the body of his wife while the wife is sitting on the front porch drinking lemonade. There is a slight chance that the wife might be an imposter, but it's not bloody likely.

I'd say it's more like a guy's wife going missing, a cop asking to search his property, and the guy giving him permission to search everything but the cellar; and the cop, having searched everywhere else, calling it good.

keymanjim · #**367** (**permalink**) 02-09-2010, 09:16 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Divine Wind

Like I said, I'm amazed how many armchair experts on this forum have so little regard for our experts in all the intelligence agencies and the military.

Your calling for facts that are not in evidence. If you want to know why they allowed him to seated then you're going to have to ask them.
The fact still remains that he is a foreign national and he is illegally holding the office.

Divine Wind · #**368** (**permalink**) 02-09-2010, 09:22 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by keymanjim

Your calling for facts that are not in evidence. If you want to know why they allowed him to seated then you're going to have to ask them.
The fact still remains that he is a foreign national and he is illegally holding the office.

It's a matter of duty. "Facts not in evidence" require a trial. If your allegations about Obama's citizenship are true, then both Bush and Cheney need to be tried for treason. Why do you continue to disagree on this matter? Don't you see that for every action or inaction there are consequences? Are you simply using this as a political ploy? Don't you see the consequences involved if this rumor had any validity at all? Don't you see that's exactly why our government takes national security so seriously?

Tapper · #**369** (**permalink**) 02-09-2010, 09:24 AM

Congress voted on it and the American public voted on it. Thank G'd majority rules in this country and not the opinions of conspiracy theorists.

I refuse to even consider the idea that the individuals in charge of running this country could be so negligent as to be fooled by a counterfeit birth certificate.

keymanjim · #**370** (**permalink**) 02-09-2010, 09:26 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Divine Wind

It's a matter of duty. "Facts not in evidence" require a trial. If your allegations about Obama's citizenship are true, then both Bush and Cheney need to be tried for treason. Why do you continue to disagree on this matter? Don't you see that for every action or inaction there are consequences? Are you simply using this as a political ploy? Don't you see the consequences involved if this rumor had any validity at all? Don't you see that's exactly why our government takes national security so seriously?

You seem to want to continually derail the tread by trying to convict Bush and Cheney.
The facts are, and will be repeated to you every time you post about Bush and Cheney, that he is a foreign national and he is illegally holding that office.

Thread Tools
Show Printable Version Email this Page
Display Modes
Linear Mode Switch to Hybrid Mode Switch to Threaded Mode

Similar Threads
Thread	Thread Starter	Forum	Replies	Last Post
CENTCOM boss (Gen. Petraeus) takes mindless shot at USAF.	Herkdriver	Warfare / Military	6	08-25-2009 06:24 AM
The birthers birthday card to President Obama	Iriemon	Humor & Satire	2	08-06-2009 07:58 AM
Biden Takes a SHot at the TOTUS...lmao	camp_steveo	Current Events	13	05-28-2009 09:08 AM
Family Guy takes a shot at GOP Ticket.	E_Pluribus_Venom	Humor & Satire	6	10-20-2008 08:57 AM
Hillary takes a shot at Blackwell	bluerose	Elections & Campaigns	2	07-13-2006 09:57 AM