Political Forum
     

Go Back   Political Forum > General Political Chat > Current Events


Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1 (permalink)  
Old 04-08-2006, 05:34 PM
cranston36 cranston36 is offline
Contributor
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Posts: 102
cranston36 is on a distinguished road
Credits: 1,739
Default Harvard University and Racism

There is something going wrong in America. Mr. Cohen of the Washington Post is right in calling the writings of those Harvard eggheads John Mearsheimer and Stephen Walt anti-semitic. Their writing is nothing more than Jew-baiting and it is offensive to every American.

To give you an idea of what sort of guy David Duke is read on.
I received an unsolicited copy of 'The Truth At Last' in my mailbox the other day.
David Duke has an article in it.
It is titled : "New Orleans: Africa-like savagery"
Subtitled : "Roving gangs of Blacks raid nursing homes and even children's hospitals".

In the article are notes such as these :
"Once again, guns save lives and property."
"The looting has now reached biblical proportions."
"To the terrified Whites of New Orleans, what appeared to be official or police vehicles often contained armed killers and rapists."
"People who are still there are hiding in closets from after 5:00 PM until the sun comes up."
"Gangs of crackheads are roaming the streets with guns in stolen city vehicles robbing, raping and killing."

"No one was dying of thirst, save perhaps for a few hopelessly trapped in their attics from risen waters."

"And a report of massive number of Negro criminals raiding a children's hospital has just come across the wire:..."

"Is this America - or Africa?"

"It's in the genes"

"I am reminded of the Northwest Airlines plane crash in Detroit in 1987, when the denizens of ghetto descended on the carnage and stripped the still-smoldering bodies and body parts of the victims of their watches, wallets, jewelry and other possessions."

Gives you an idea of what is going on at Harvard.

http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn...82.html?sub=AR
Reply With Quote
Sponsored Links
Red Cross - Donate Today    Save the Rainforest
  #2 (permalink)  
Old 04-08-2006, 05:56 PM
ForceoftheTruth's Avatar
ForceoftheTruth ForceoftheTruth is offline
Guru
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Oregon
Posts: 8,897
ForceoftheTruth is on a distinguished road
Credits: 42,790
Default .

I agree completely that the paper is anti-Semitic. By the way, Shamgar will soon come into this thread with maniacal laughter and go on an anti-Semitic rant.
__________________
"I am a Tory Anarchist. I should like every one to go about doing just as he pleased- short of altering any of the things to which I have grown accustomed." (Max Beerbohm)
Reply With Quote
  #3 (permalink)  
Old 04-08-2006, 06:16 PM
cranston36 cranston36 is offline
Contributor
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Posts: 102
cranston36 is on a distinguished road
Credits: 1,739
Default Ha ha

Well, before he gets here, here is something for him.

Anyone whose (white) heart is filled with fear and hatred can contact :

The Truth at Last

Box 1211

Marietta GA 30061

Now you can get in touch with some folks who think like you do.

I caution you, however, before you contact them you better be sure you're the right kind of white.
Reply With Quote
  #4 (permalink)  
Old 04-09-2006, 06:31 AM
SporkLord SporkLord is offline
Analyst
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Posts: 2,517
SporkLord is on a distinguished road
Credits: 13,451
Default ...

Quote:
Originally Posted by ForceoftheTruth";p=&quot View Post
I agree completely that the paper is anti-Semitic. By the way, Shamgar will soon come into this thread with maniacal laughter and go on an anti-Semitic rant.
Have you read the "Israel Lobby" paper?
I have, and it is critical of Israel, and of US unconditioned support for Israel, but it is not anti-Semitic.
Calling it anti-Semitic is just an easy way to dismiss all the points it brings up; why does Israel receive such lavish US support, for little conceivable return for US national interest?
Reply With Quote
  #5 (permalink)  
Old 04-09-2006, 06:42 AM
cranston36 cranston36 is offline
Contributor
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Posts: 102
cranston36 is on a distinguished road
Credits: 1,739
Default Do you hate jews that much?

The way it is worded is anti-Semitic and cowardly.

It suggests that had we 'behaved' we would not have incurred the wrath of Osama Bin Laden and New York City would not have been attacked.

It appears you are taking the wrong side in a wrongful argument.

Another article in 'The Truth At Last' is 'Bush Lies; America Dies'.

Are you a traitor against our national government and president as well?
Do you hate Jews that much?
Reply With Quote
  #6 (permalink)  
Old 04-09-2006, 07:26 AM
Shamgar Shamgar is offline
Commentator
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Posts: 904
Shamgar is on a distinguished road
Credits: 9,047
Default `

hahahahhaaaaaaaa the jews are going to sue everyone who doesn't lick their hobnailed boots. . . bow down to your local jew. . . .

John 9: 22 These words spake his parents, because they feared the Jews: for the Jews had agreed already, that if any man did confess that he was Christ, he should be put out of the synagogue.

http://www.usatoday.com/news/educati...s-jewish_x.htm
Anti-Israel bias at colleges scrutinized
Posted 4/3/2006 9:58 PM
By Mary Beth Marklein, USA TODAY

The U.S. Commission on Civil Rights, responding to allegations that an anti-Israel bias is rampant on college campuses, approved recommendations Monday aimed at ensuring that Jewish college students are protected from anti-Semitic harassment.

The recommendations grew out of a November hearing at which speakers cited examples of anti-Semitic incidents. One frequently cited involved a 2004 documentary that said Middle East Studies faculty at Columbia University were intimidating Jewish students who defended Israel. (A faculty committee investigated and found no evidence of anti-Semitism.) Last September, a non-profit group called "StandWithUs" showed a 45-minute documentary depicting examples of anti-Israel speakers on campuses.

The commission, an independent, bipartisan federal agency that does not have enforcement powers, also urged university leaders to "set a moral example by denouncing anti-Semitic and other hate speech," and to ensure that Middle East studies departments protect the rights of all students. It recommended Monday that the Department of Education "vigorously" enforce the federal law that bars discrimination based on "race, color or national origin," and that Congress clarify that "national origin" can refer to Jewish heritage.

"We should inform students of their right" to file a complaint if they believe they have been harassed, commissioner Jennifer Braceras said.

Students at the University of California at Irvine, including two who said they were assaulted because they were Jewish, filed a complaint in 2004 with the Education Department's Office of Civil Rights. That case is still open. Now, "you'll see a number of suits filed," says Gary Tobin of the Institute for Jewish and Community Research in San Francisco.

Vanessa Zuabi, 21, a UC-Irvine senior and former vice president of the school's Society of Arab Students, says the issue is complex. For example, she says, a structure built two years ago by her group was burned down. "Controversy has gone in all directions."
Reply With Quote
  #7 (permalink)  
Old 04-09-2006, 08:06 AM
ellesdee ellesdee is offline
Contributor
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Posts: 88
ellesdee is on a distinguished road
Credits: 973
Default Totally true

Quote:
Originally Posted by SporkLord";p=&quot View Post
Quote:
Originally Posted by ForceoftheTruth";p=&quot View Post
I agree completely that the paper is anti-Semitic. By the way, Shamgar will soon come into this thread with maniacal laughter and go on an anti-Semitic rant.
Have you read the "Israel Lobby" paper?
I have, and it is critical of Israel, and of US unconditioned support for Israel, but it is not anti-Semitic.
Calling it anti-Semitic is just an easy way to dismiss all the points it brings up; why does Israel receive such lavish US support, for little conceivable return for US national interest?
We ought to be pulling most of our support for Israel off the table. No more billion dollar kickbacks for sure. All they do is drag us down into war for them. Well, they got nukes. They got a strong military. They don't need our help. Let them fend for themselves.
__________________
Love causes fear.
Love causes sorrow.
Those without love have neither sorrow nor fear.
Reply With Quote
  #8 (permalink)  
Old 04-09-2006, 08:52 AM
Shamgar Shamgar is offline
Commentator
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Posts: 904
Shamgar is on a distinguished road
Credits: 9,047
Default `

Quote:
Originally Posted by cranston36";p=&quot View Post
There is something going wrong in America. Mr. Cohen of the Washington Post is right in calling the writings of those Harvard eggheads John Mearsheimer and Stephen Walt anti-semitic. Their writing is nothing more than Jew-baiting and it is offensive to every American.

To give you an idea of what sort of guy David Duke is read on.
I received an unsolicited copy of 'The Truth At Last' in my mailbox the other day.
David Duke has an article in it.
Say how many times was David Duke quoted in the Israel Lobby paper. . . .and exactly what affilitation does DD have with the authors?. . . .I mean aside from the smear tactic of the Godless jews. . . .
Reply With Quote
  #9 (permalink)  
Old 04-09-2006, 09:37 AM
ForceoftheTruth's Avatar
ForceoftheTruth ForceoftheTruth is offline
Guru
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Oregon
Posts: 8,897
ForceoftheTruth is on a distinguished road
Credits: 42,790
Default .

Quote:
Originally Posted by SporkLord";p=&quot View Post
Quote:
Originally Posted by ForceoftheTruth";p=&quot View Post
I agree completely that the paper is anti-Semitic. By the way, Shamgar will soon come into this thread with maniacal laughter and go on an anti-Semitic rant.
Have you read the "Israel Lobby" paper?
No, but not surprisingly, Shamgar has copied and pasted much of it on this site. This (from the Washington Post article) sums up why the paper is anti-Semitic:

Inept, even kooky academic work, then, but is it anti-Semitic? If by anti-Semitism one means obsessive and irrationally hostile beliefs about Jews; if one accuses them of disloyalty, subversion or treachery, of having occult powers and of participating in secret combinations that manipulate institutions and governments; if one systematically selects everything unfair, ugly or wrong about Jews as individuals or a group and equally systematically suppresses any exculpatory information -- why, yes, this paper is anti-Semitic.
__________________
"I am a Tory Anarchist. I should like every one to go about doing just as he pleased- short of altering any of the things to which I have grown accustomed." (Max Beerbohm)
Reply With Quote
  #10 (permalink)  
Old 04-09-2006, 10:46 AM
Shamgar Shamgar is offline
Commentator
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Posts: 904
Shamgar is on a distinguished road
Credits: 9,047
Default `

Quote:
Originally Posted by ForceoftheTruth";p=&quot View Post
Inept, even kooky academic work, then, but is it anti-Semitic? If by anti-Semitism one means obsessive and irrationally hostile beliefs about Jews; if one accuses them of disloyalty, subversion or treachery, of having occult powers and of participating in secret combinations that manipulate institutions and governments; if one systematically selects everything unfair, ugly or wrong about Jews as individuals or a group and equally systematically suppresses any exculpatory information -- why, yes, this paper is anti-Semitic.
Yeah you will notice that until farce read the article he could NOT tell you why it was 'antisemitc'. . .but now he has received his jew propaganda update. . now he "knows" why. . . .

His propaganda [Joseph Goebbels] crusades were based on a simple observation: What the masses term truth is that information which is most familiar. As Goebbels put it:
'The rank and file are usually much more primitive than we imagine. Propaganda must therefore always be essentially simple and repetitious. In the long run only he will achieve basic results in influencing public opinion who is able to reduce problems to the simplest terms and who has the courage to keep forever repeating them in this simplified form despite the objections of the intellectuals.(5)'

Pratkanis, Anthony and Aronson, “Age of Propaganda": The Everyday Use and Abuse of Persuasion” (New York: 2001) Page 182.
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are Off
Forum Jump

Sponsored Links

All times are GMT -8. The time now is 02:38 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.7.1
Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
LinkBacks Enabled by vBSEO 3.1.0
Template-Modifikationen durch TMS
vBCredits v1.3 ©2007 by Darkwaltz4
Advertisement System V2.1 By   Branden