![]() |
|
| Sponsored Links |
| Red Cross - Donate Today Save the Rainforest |
|
|||
|
Iran is probably saying it will up its support for Hezbollah and Islamic Jihad in exchange for increased attacks on Israelis if the Americans attack Iranian nuclear facilities. A reluctance to say they would sponsor more terrorism makes more sense than a threat to use non-existent nukes or direct attacks on Israel.
|
|
||||
|
As of right now, Iran could give the material for a dirty bomb to anti-Israel or anti-American terrorists. In about three years, it could give them an atomic bomb. We have to destroy Iran's nuclear facilities- period.
__________________
"I am a Tory Anarchist. I should like every one to go about doing just as he pleased- short of altering any of the things to which I have grown accustomed." (Max Beerbohm) |
|
|||
|
force thats the same thing as saying we need to destroy our nuclear facilities because we could just as easily distribute them to other nations as well
and we have just look at israel, they have a good handful of OUR nukes... maybe we should practice what we preach and instead of forcing nuclear proliferation with threats, lead by example and show how a true world power acts and disarm our nuclear resources and just use our uranium for energy but this will never happen, due to the irrational fear that other nations will attack us with nuclear weapons, even though we're the only nation that's used such weapons
__________________
i'm not a democrat, quit calling me one |
|
||||
|
just because they've never done it does not mean it will never happen. Ted Bundy had a first victim, yet at one time you could also make the claim "well Ted has yet to harm anybody." At one time Japan had never attacked the US, it doesn't mean (obviously) that it wouldn't happen.
The US will never be the first country to rid itself of nukes because then there will be other countries with them while we are without. That will never change nor would most Amercians want it to.
__________________
All you need to know about the energy crisis: ANWR Exploration Republicans: 91% Supported. Democrats: 86% Opposed. Coal-to-liquid R's: 90% YES. D's: 78% NO. Oil Shale Exploration R's: 90% YES. D's: 86% NO. Outer Continental Shelf Exploration R's: 81% YES. D's: 83% NO. Increased Refinery Capacity R's: 97% YES. D's: 96% NO SUMMARY: 91% of House Republicans have historically voted to increase the production of America’s own oil and gas. 86% of House Democrats have historically voted against. |
|
|||
|
Quote:
__________________
i'm not a democrat, quit calling me one |
|
||||
|
the US has not threatened a nuke attack, unlike Iran. TheUS also hasn't called for the total destruction of a country, also unlike Iran.
__________________
All you need to know about the energy crisis: ANWR Exploration Republicans: 91% Supported. Democrats: 86% Opposed. Coal-to-liquid R's: 90% YES. D's: 78% NO. Oil Shale Exploration R's: 90% YES. D's: 86% NO. Outer Continental Shelf Exploration R's: 81% YES. D's: 83% NO. Increased Refinery Capacity R's: 97% YES. D's: 96% NO SUMMARY: 91% of House Republicans have historically voted to increase the production of America’s own oil and gas. 86% of House Democrats have historically voted against. |
|
|||
|
Quote:
Quote:
__________________
i'm not a democrat, quit calling me one |
|
|||
|
Quote:
2. Leaked Pentagon plans describe an attack on Iran using nuclear weapons. 3. We had a standing threat for decades to reduce the Soviet Union to rubble. We are the only country to drop nuclear weapons on a country. We are a very credible threat. Israel has threatened to use nuclear weapons on enemies. Iranian neighbors, Pakistan and India, have threatened to nuke each other. It is reasonable to expect Iran to want to have the capacity to threaten their enemies with the same weapons against which they are threatened. |
![]() |
| Bookmarks |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
| Sponsored Links |
|