Big Government Gets Bigger
Study Counts More Employees, Cites Increase in Contractors

By Christopher Lee
Washington Post Staff Writer
Friday, October 6, 2006; Page A21

The federal government keeps getting bigger.

The Republican Party's oft-stated affinity for smaller government has not applied during the Bush administration. According to a recent study, not only is the number of federal civil servants on the rise, but so are the numbers of employees working for government-funded contractors and for organizations that receive government grants.

Roll all of those together -- and mix in the numbers of postal workers and military personnel on the federal payroll -- and the "true size" of the federal government stands at 14.6 million employees, said Paul C. Light, the study's author and a government professor at New York University.

That compares with 12.1 million employees in 2002, said Light, who has tracked the growth of government for years and has data for as far back as 1990. The latest increase is almost entirely due to contractors, whose ranks swelled by 2.5 million since 2002, Light wrote in his 10-page research brief.

"This time, almost all of the growth can be attributed from the war on terrorism, which boosted Defense spending for both goods and services systems and covered the continued cost of the wars in Afghanistan and Iraq," he wrote.

"The rest of the hidden workforce held steady at roughly 2.9 million grantees, while civil service employment inched up and postal employment fell."

Light calls the 10.5 million federal contractors and grantees the government's "hidden workforce" because politicians tend not to mention them when discussing the size of the federal bureaucracy. Yet such workers absorbed nearly $400 billion in federal contracting funds and $100 billion in federal grants in 2005. They often performed vital work such as researching new vaccines, running federal computer systems and making body armor, weapons and meals for the military.

The number of civil servants is increasing, too, up 54,000 since 2002 to 1.9 million workers. That is still fewer than the 2.2 million civil servants on the federal payroll in 1990, at the end of the Cold War.

Light acknowledges that his numbers of contractors and grantee employees are estimates from federal procurement and grant data, and are harder to nail down than the number of civil servants. But the trend is clear, he said.

Politicians who focus on the size of the civil service and fail to acknowledge the hidden workforce "encourage the public into believing that it truly can get more for less," Light said. And the heavy reliance on such workers, while sometimes necessary, makes it more difficult to figure out who is accountable when things go wrong, he said.

"The federal government often uses contractors and grantees to provide talent it cannot recruit, specialized services it cannot produce, competition it cannot generate among its own organizations, and equipment that it cannot and should not build itself," Light wrote.

"[i]t hardly matters who produces the goods and services as long as the federal government is honest with the public about the true cost of delivering on the promises it makes."

http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn...100501782.html

__________________
"All truth passes through three stages. First, it is ridiculed. Second, it is violently opposed. Third, it is accepted as being self-evident." - Schopenhauer

Yay, Democrats (International Socialists) suddenly care about the total amount of government expenditures. Yay, this is a new age, indeed. *opens champaign bottle* Yay, progress.

Is there any reason I should care if a Democrat is critisizing Republicans, who they hate, for raising spending about 1%, where only a fraction of the Democrat's platform involves a 50% increase of the remaining Gross National Product that isn't being taxed on one singular program called Nationalized Healthcare?

Im thinking of some words.... Hmm..

-Two faced.

-Liars.

-Flip Flop.

-Dishonest.

-Fork Tongued.

-Evil.

-Manipulative.

-Propaganda.

-Cosmic Hypocracy.

Its certainly a definition that can't be spun.

Liberals for increasing government
Conservatives for decreasing government.

Whether they actually get in office and follow through with it...is another story.

__________________
"A government that is big enough to give you all you want is big enough to take it all away."

The Solution for Illegal Immigrants (Gray areas discussed throughout the thread)

BS

__________________
I've been informed....don't blame Bush, he's "not in control"
That must make him out of control

Republicans are in the majority but fiscal conservatives are not. There are numerous fiscal conservatives in the Republican party, but they are extremely hard to find anymore on the Democratic side of the isle. Just watch the voting on any spending bill - with the exception of defense spending.

So...

Liberals for increasing government
Conservatives for not increasing government as much?

__________________
"A government that is big enough to give you all you want is big enough to take it all away."

The Solution for Illegal Immigrants (Gray areas discussed throughout the thread)

Close ...

Liberals for increasing government
Conservatives comproming with moderates to get enough votes to increase the government as little as possible while still passing the necessary appropriation bills

Well I guess some WILL still try to spin it.

So look at it this way...

Looking at politicians and non-political representative for each side:

Who is more likely to praise small government?

__________________
"A government that is big enough to give you all you want is big enough to take it all away."

The Solution for Illegal Immigrants (Gray areas discussed throughout the thread)

Which explains, of course, why the government has NEVER been bigger even though "conservatives" have been running the show for years now.

__________________
I wasn't born with enough middle fingers.