Georgia display divides veterans’ names by race - Page 9

The12thMan · #81 (**permalink**) 11-16-2006, 07:49 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by superbadbrutha";p=&quot

If OJ was the average black man with no money he would be in Pelican Bay on Death Row right now.

Which is where he belongs I might add. BUT, if he was a white man, he'd be on death row too. His skin color worked in his favor this time.

Quote:

Unfortunately, there are two justice systems in this country, separate and unequal. Black people were judging the justice system that has always unjustly judged us, we were not cheering for OJ.

Peace.

Justice is supposed to be blind. Letting a murderer go free is nothing to cheer about. A black man getting away with murder rights no wrongs - helps no one.

superbadbrutha · #82 (**permalink**) 11-16-2006, 11:29 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by The12thMan";p=&quot

Quote:

Originally Posted by superbadbrutha";p=&quot

If OJ was the average black man with no money he would be in Pelican Bay on Death Row right now.

Which is where he belongs I might add. BUT, if he was a white man, he'd be on death row too. His skin color worked in his favor this time.

Lets see Robert Blake is not on Death Row didn't he kill his wife. Marv Albert was wearing womens undergarments and taking bits out of his former girlfriend, and not a year later he was right back on TV as though nothing happened. There has always been two justice systems and probably always will.

Quote:

Unfortunately, there are two justice systems in this country, separate and unequal. Black people were judging the justice system that has always unjustly judged us, we were not cheering for OJ.

Peace.

Justice is supposed to be blind.

Yes she is, but unfortunately too many times when we are on the stand she is peeking around the blindfold.

Letting a murderer go free is nothing to cheer about.

Who cheered for letting a murderer go free? He was acquitted in a court of law.

A black man getting away with murder rights no wrongs - helps no one.

No one every claimed it did. It is the state's job to prove beyond a reasonable doubt that he is guilty, evidently the jury didn't see it that way.

Peace.

The12thMan · #83 (**permalink**) 11-16-2006, 11:46 AM

I didn't watch coverage of the Robert Blake trial. I don't know why the jury found him not guilty.

Quote:

No one every claimed it did. It is the state's job to prove beyond a reasonable doubt that he is guilty, evidently the jury didn't see it that way.

I did watch coverage of the Simpson case. I don't know why the jury found him not guilty.

Marv who? Did he get away with murder too?

barney-fife · #84 (**permalink**) 11-16-2006, 12:29 PM

Marv Albert, the NBA broadcaster who wears a bad rug. He dressed up in lady's undies and bit some woman during some sex they were having.

http://www.courttv.com/archive/casef...arvalbert.html

Rebellion · #85 (**permalink**) 11-16-2006, 12:37 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by superbadbrutha";p=&quot

Quote:

Originally Posted by Rebellion";p=&quot

Quote:

Originally Posted by superbadbrutha";p=&quot

Quote:

Originally Posted by Rebellion";p=&quot

Quote:

Originally Posted by superbadbrutha";p=&quot

In 1934 an antilynching bill fails in Congress due to lack of support from the Roosevelt Administration, think about that it is not even against the law to murder a black man.

In 1937 an antilynching bill passes in the US House of Rep., but is killed by a southern filibuster in the Senate.

some of your favorite liberals such as LBJ can be thanked for that little fact.

....since he didn't run for the US Senate until 1941.

Peace.

LBJ voted against a later anti-lynching bill in the 1940's and against a host of other civil rights bills in the 40's and 50's. Because it wasn't politically convenient for him at the time.

How many Republican Presidents did we have before LBJ? Fact is it was a Democrat President that signed the Voting Rights Act in to law and the Civil Rights Act into law that is why Democrats get credit for it, if Republicans wanted credit for it maybe one of them should have signed it into law.

Peace.

It's impossible for a Republican President to sign the bill, as Eisenhower wanted to do, when the democrat congress refuses to pass it. In fact one vote didn't pass a civil rights bill because some democrat senator from Georgia fillibustered it for 6 straight days. So of course the dems named a building in DC in his honor.

So you're giving credit to the dems and you have no idea why.

gadzooks · #86 (**permalink**) 11-16-2006, 09:23 PM

[quote="superbadbrutha";p="312454"]

Quote:

Originally Posted by gadzooks";p=&quot

Sorry ,tell it to the Iranians that teach their children that Jews are "asses and pigs"
You zipped right by the blacks calling any other black "Uncle Tom" when they would dare side with a white, or be a Republican.

That term goes all the way back to slavery days. Every black person that is a Republican is not labeled a Uncle Tom only people like JC Watts or Armstrong Williams, Clarence Thomas. Colin Powell or Michael Steele are not termed as Uncle Toms.
Hell, the black people were dancing in the streets when O.J. Simpson (the football player) was found innocent of the murder of his white wife.

Black people were not cheering for OJ Simpson, we were cheering for what we thought was a equal justice system for a change.

Funny thing is O.J. is a rich black man who never did anything for the blacks. He was probably the least persecuted black in America and yet they cheered a murderer.

If OJ was the average black man with no money he would be in Pelican Bay on Death Row right now. Unfortunately, there are two justice systems in this country, separate and unequal. Black people were judging the justice system that has always unjustly judged us, we were not cheering for OJ.

Peace.

Why are Clarence Thomas , Arnstrong Williams, considered "uncle Tom" by many. There is no justification. Are they not free to have their own opinions ?

Second, my point was that blacks stuck together in the O.J. case(they stuck with him right or wrong) , proving exactly that even though he had nothing in common but his color with the average black man they stuck by his side. they were not interested in justice. Do you honestly believe justice was served in that trial ? Why deny that people stick together,it is a fact, not a crime.

This is not just for blacks,but whites ,yelllow,red men also. Hell every animal that walks the face of the earth usually prefers to be with their own kind.

Remember you are what you am , a cow don't make ham.

superbadbrutha · #87 (**permalink**) 11-17-2006, 04:25 AM

[quote="gadzooks";p="312859"][quote="superbadbrutha";p="312454"]

Quote:

Originally Posted by gadzooks";p=&quot

Why are Clarence Thomas , Arnstrong Williams, considered "uncle Tom" by many. There is no justification. Are they not free to have their own opinions ?

An opinion is one thing, but actions are another. Please explain too me how Uncle Thomas used an AA program to attend Harvard Law School reaches the plataeu of his career and then turns around and wants to destroy that same avenue for those coming behind him.

As for Armstrong Williams how in the hell can u idolize a man that wanted no more to do with you than he would a rattle snake.

Second, my point was that blacks stuck together in the O.J. case(they stuck with him right or wrong) , proving exactly that even though he had nothing in common but his color with the average black man they stuck by his side. they were not interested in justice.

Please black people have been unjustly convicted in this country since the onset and I didn't hear any outrage over that. In the South black people were murdered and the juries consisted of the murderers, aunts, uncles, cousins, etc. and they were allowed to walk scott free. Dela Beckwith murdered Medgar Evers in 1963 and wasn't brought to the Bar of Justice until he was 91 years old after he had lived a full life. Many of the murders of black people in the 60s have never been brought to the Bar of Justice where is the outrage?

Do you honestly believe justice was served in that trial ?

According to the system it was.

Why deny that people stick together,it is a fact, not a crime.

It is not fact, black people serve on juries everyday and convict other black people everyday.

This is not just for blacks,but whites ,yelllow,red men also. Hell every animal that walks the face of the earth usually prefers to be with their own kind.

I judge a man by his character not his skin color.

Remember you are what you am , a cow don't make ham.

But he does make a HAMburger.

Peace.

LoSconosciuto · #88 (**permalink**) 11-17-2006, 05:05 PM

Joe's tactics as he formed the Italian-American Civil Rights League are very similar to a certain poster's tactics here: skew the facts and revise history... then deny the truth.

I guess David Duke (probably a hero of some here) embodied the same spirit and charisma as ol' Joe. But the light of truth tends to catch up with all of us one way or another.

And though I am no fan of Robert Byrd, one of the same people who critically brings up his Klan membership, acts as a Klan apologist in this thread. And Byrd was a member of the Klan and a Kleagle during the VERY same period that this poster claims the Klan was just a fraternal organization.

Interesting...