![]() |
|
|
||||
|
I think Borak Obama will be the next president, because he is the biggest hypocrite even bigger then Clinton: from http://kucinich.us/ :
Quote:
__________________
“You can’t keep saying you’re a peace candidate and keep voting to fund the war” – Dennis Kucinich http://kucinich.us/ |
| Sponsored Links |
| Red Cross - Donate Today Save the Rainforest |
|
||||
|
Iran is doing what he is saying.
Oh I see you want him to lie...
__________________
McCain 2008 "We make war that we may live in peace" "...peace is the highest aspiration of the American People. We will negotiate for it, sacrifice for it, we will never surrender for it, now or ever." "Oderint dum metuant" "Inartful: clear and straightforward, lacking the artistry that allows subsequent self-refutation and denial." http://members.cox.net/neddy/bobhope_kerfuffles.wmv http://youtube.com/watch?v=RnfflRNpwKA http://youtube.com/watch?v=j-QYIP7o2-A |
|
||||
|
Quote:
As far as Obama being elected president, a lot depends upon the next 18 months. If nothing significant changes in the War in Iraq, a large portion of the votes will be pulled to a Democratic candidate - just as they were for the 2006 election. Now if Bush were smart, he would sign the Democratic budget bill and bring the troops home by 2008. That would allow the Republicans to blame the Democrats for any resulting problems, and a big weight would be lifted from McCain's head. As far as Ms. Clinton is concerned, I am one her "negative voters"...who wouldn't vote for her if she walked on water. Since the Republican's (ie, Bush) shows no sign of ending the war soon, Obama could convince some of us swing voters that he is the one to "write a new Chapter" in Washington politics. That said, I make a special note that a lot of dark horses are still in the race...and any one of a half dozen of them could pull off a upset win at the finish line.
__________________
Hobo Charter member of 'Republicans Who Hate Bush" Club |
|
||||
|
Quote:
|
|
|||
|
Quote:
Your second statement, however, is presumably based on empirical evidence of some kind. Given that, it would be interesting to know what evidence you would cite. Ms. Rice has was a disaster as the Bush administration's National Security Advisor, both before and after 9/11. In fact, if it were not for the recent all-time record set by AG Gonzales, her track record for lack of recall would stand as a record in itself. She admittedly failed to take seriously a variety of warnings in the summer of 2001 regarding a potential attack on the US. She presided over a dysfunctional office that failed to prevent the insertion of the absurd "aluminum tubes" proclamation in the President's 2003 State of the Union address. And she bears personal responsibility for spreading ludicrous claims about the imminent danger of "mushroom clouds" if the US didn't invade Iraq. As Secretary of State her performance has been no better. In fact, her frequent efforts at "shuttle diplomacy" has only underscored her ineffectiveness. And while she has been portrayed as a counter-balance to Secy Rumsfeld until he resigned, it would be interesting to hear a single example of an effective initiative on her part to oppose Rumsfeld's disastrous policies. In fact, it would be interesting to hear a single example of her successful efforts at formulating or even influencing policy since his departure. Although political and economic "reconstruction" is a central theme in the current "surge," Ms. Rice has in effect abandoned any responsibility for staffing that aspect of the administration's policies. Criticism of her ineffectiveness in virtually all aspects of her job, from friends and foes alike, is deafening in the diplomatic community. In short, Ms. Rice is a somewhat more articulate version of Alberto Gonzales, an office holder whose performance in each of her jobs in the administration has been marginal or worse. Why on earth anyone would consider her to be the "best of the bunch" as a Presidential candidate is a mystery. Can you enlighten me?
__________________
"To announce that..we are to stand by the president whether right or wrong..is morally treasonable to the American public." -- Theodore Roosevelt, 1918 |
|
||||
|
Quote:
and don't tell me Kucinich is a republican, i dont care about party names, Kucinich (aside from Gravel) is the most honest person I've seen nominated by the media yet, but he is much less nominated then 3 scumbags Hillary, Ubama and Biden...
__________________
“You can’t keep saying you’re a peace candidate and keep voting to fund the war” – Dennis Kucinich http://kucinich.us/ |
|
||||
|
Condaleeza Rice would make a great President but she has made it clear she will not run..maybe Vice Presdient though..never know.
__________________
McCain 2008 "We make war that we may live in peace" "...peace is the highest aspiration of the American People. We will negotiate for it, sacrifice for it, we will never surrender for it, now or ever." "Oderint dum metuant" "Inartful: clear and straightforward, lacking the artistry that allows subsequent self-refutation and denial." http://members.cox.net/neddy/bobhope_kerfuffles.wmv http://youtube.com/watch?v=RnfflRNpwKA http://youtube.com/watch?v=j-QYIP7o2-A |
|
|||
|
Quote:
__________________
I'll never Forget. To pull You Closer is to Pull You Down. Ignorence can be an envy. Applaud us as the old American Power goes quietly into the night. |
![]() |
| Bookmarks |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
| Sponsored Links |
|